Minimal Important Difference (MID) of two commonly used outcome measures for foot problems

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Landorf, Karl B ^a   Radford, Joel A ^b   Hudson, Susie ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551694604     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17571146     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-3-7     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient-reported Outcomes 2007, Chichester: Wiley, 2.
2. Bowling A. Measuring Health: A review of quality of life measurement scales 2005, Maidenhead: Open University Press, 3.
3. Carr AJ, Higginson IJ. Measuring Quality of Life: Are quality of life measures patient centred?. Br Med J 2001, 322:1357-1360.
4. Morris LA, Miller DW. The Regulation of Patient-Reported Outcome Claims: Need for a Flexible Standard. Value Health 2002, 5:372-381. 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2002.54073.x, 12102699.
5. Haywood KL. Patient-reported outcome I: Measuring what matters in musculoskeletal care. Musculoskeletal Care 2006, 4:187-203. 10.1002/msc.94, 17117444.
6. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Ascertaining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference. Control Clin Trials 1989, 10:407-415. 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6, 2691207.
7. Schunemann HJ, Guyatt GH. Commentary-Goodbye M(C)ID! Hello MID, Where Do You Come From?. Health Serv Res 2005, 40:593-597. 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.0k375.x, 1361157, 15762909.
8. Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important difference for patient reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2008, 61:102-109. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012, 18177782.
9. Martin RL, Irrgang JJ. A survey of Self-reported Outcome Instruments for the Foot and Ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2007, 37:72-84. 10.2519/jospt.2007.2403, 17366962.
10. Landorf KB, Burns J. Health Outcome Assessment. Merriman's Assessment of the Lower Limb 2009, 33-51. Edinburgh: Elsevier, Yates B, 3.
11. Bennett PJ, Patterson C. The Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FSHQ): a new instrument for measuring outcomes of footcare. Australas J Podiatr Med 1998, 32:87-92.
12. Landorf KB, Radford JA. Minimal important difference: Values for the Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Foot Function Index and Visual Analogue Scale. Foot 2008, 18:15-19.
13. Radford JA, Landorf KB, Buchbinder R, Cook C. Effectiveness of low-Dye taping for the short-term treatment of plantar heel pain: a randomised trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006, 7:64. 10.1186/1471-2474-7-64, 1569832, 16895612.
14. Radford JA, Landorf KB, Buchbinder R, Cook C. Effectiveness of calf muscle stretching for the short-term treatment of plantar heel pain: a randomised trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007, 8:36. 10.1186/1471-2474-8-36, 1867816, 17442119.
15. Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, Hogg MIJ. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia 1976, 31:1191-1198. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x, 1015603.
16. Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain 1976, 2:175-184. 10.1016/0304-3959(76)90113-5, 1026900.
17. Bennett PJ, Patterson C, Wearing S, Baglioni T. Development and Validation of a Questionnaire Designed to Measure Foot-Health Status. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1998, 83:419-428.
18. McDowell I. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires 2006, New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, R B. Clinical Significance of Reported Changes in Pain Severity. Ann Emerg Med 1996, 27:485-489. 10.1016/S0196-0644(96)70238-X, 8604867.
20. Kelly AM. Does the Clinically Significant Difference in Visual Analogue Scale Pain Scores Vary with Gender, Age, or Cause of Pain. Emerg Med 1998, 5:1086-1090.
21. Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J 2001, 18:205-207. 10.1136/emj.18.3.205, 1725574, 11354213.
22. Landorf KB, Keenan A-M. An evaluation of two foot-specific, health-related quality-of-life measuring instruments. Foot Ankle Int 2002, 23:538-546.
23. Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL. Fundamentals of clinical trials 1998, New York: Springer.