Corporate philanthropic selection using data envelopment analysis

Omega

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 522-527

  Partovi, Fariborz Y ^a  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

DEA; Philanthropy

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551684878     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2010.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Andreoni J. Economics of philanthropy. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioural Sciences 2001, Elsevier Sciences Ltd., p. 11369-1137. N.J. Smelser, P.B. Baltes (Eds.).
2. Carrol A.B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review 1979, 4(4):497-505.
3. Carrol A.B. Corporate social responsibility. Business and Society 1999, 38(3):268-293.
4. Smith J. The new corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review 1994, 72(3):105-114.
5. Porter M.E., Kramer M.R. Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review 2006, 84(12):78-92.
6. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 1978, 2(6):429-444.
7. Bougnol M.-L., Dulá J.H., Estellita Lins M.P., Moreira da Silva A.C. Enhancing standard performance practices with DEA. Omega 2010, 38(1/2):33-45.
8. Cooper W.W., Seaford L.M., Tone K. Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software 2000, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
9. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Lewin A.Y., Seiford L.M. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications 1994, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
10. Norman M., Stoker B. Data Envelopment Analysis: The Assessment of Performance 1991, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
11. Ramanathan R. An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis: A Tool for Performance Measurement 2003, Sage Publications, New Delhi.
12. Eilat H., Golany B., Shtub A. R&D project evaluation: an integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach. Omega 2008, 36(5):895-912.
13. Li Y., Liang L., Chen Y., Morita H. Models for measuring and benchmarking Olympics achievements. Omega 2008, 36(6):933-940.
14. Chang S.-H., Hsiao H.-C., Huang L.-H., Chang H. Taiwan quality indicator project and hospital productivity growth. Omega 2011, 39(1):14-22.
15. Liu J.S., Lu W.-M. DEA and ranking with the network-based approach: a case of R&D performance. Omega 2010, 38(6):453-464.
16. Siriopoulos C., Tziogkidis P. How do Greek banking institutions react after significant events?-a DEA approach. Omega 2010, 38(5):294-308.
17. Sexton T.R., Silkman R.H., Hogan A.J. Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis 1986, 73-105. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California. R.H. Silkman (Ed.).
18. Wu J., Liang L., Chen Y. DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings. Omega 2009, 37(4):909-918.
19. Andersen P., Petersen N.C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 1993, 39(10):1261-1264.
20. Sinuany-Stern Z., Mehrez A., Barboy A. Academic departments efficiency via data envelopment analysis. Computer and Operations Research 1994, 21(5):543-556.
21. Golany B., Roll Y. Incorporating standards via data envelopment analysis. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications 1994, 313-328. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, A.Y. Lewin, L.M. Seiford (Eds.).
22. Doyle J.R., Green R.H. Comparing products using data envelopment analysis. Omega 1991, 19(6):631-638.
23. Doyle J.R., Green R.H. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses. Journal of Operational Research Society 1994, 45(5):567-578.
24. Torgersen A.M., Forsund F.R. Kittelsen SAC. Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units. The Journal of Productivity Analysis 1996, 7:379-398.
25. Adler N., Friedman L., Sinuany-Stern Z. Review of ranking methods in data envelopment analysis context. European Journal of Operational Research 2002, 140(2):249-265.
26. Banker R., Chang H. The super-efficiency procedure for outlier identification, not for ranking efficient units. European Journal of Operational Research 2006, 175(2):1311-1320.