Modeling and optimization of voltage and treatment time for electrocoagulation removal of hexavalent chromium

Desalination

Volumn 269, Issue 1-3, 2011, Pages 157-162

  Bhatti, Manpreet S ^a   Reddy, Akepati S ^b   Kalia, Rajeev K ^c   Thukral, Ashwani K ^a  

^a GURU NANAK DEV UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b THAPAR UNIVERSITY   (India)

^c GGSS Thermal Power Plant ^*  (India)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Cr(VI) removal; Design Expert software; Desirability plot; Response surface methodology; Statistical modeling

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CR(VI) REMOVAL; DESIGN-EXPERT SOFTWARE; DESIRABILITY PLOT; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODELING;

CHROMIUM; CHROMIUM COMPOUNDS; COAGULATION; DESIGN; ENERGY UTILIZATION; FORECASTING; OPTIMIZATION; REMOVAL; STATISTICAL METHODS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CHROMIUM; COAGULATION; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; ELECTROKINESIS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; MODEL VALIDATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PREDICTION; SOFTWARE;

EID: 79551683155     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.10.055     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abassi S.A., Abassi N., Soni R. Heavy metals in the environment 1997, Mittal Publications, New Delhi.
2. Pollution Control Law Series Pollution Control Acts, Rules and Notifications Issued Thereunder, CPCB, Ministry of Environment and Forests 2001, Govt. of India, New Delhi.
3. Eckenfelder W.W. Industrial Water Pollution Control 2000, McGraw Hill, Singapore. 3rd ed.
4. Chen G. Electrochemical technologies in wastewater treatment. Sep. Purific. Technol. 2004, 38:11-41.
5. Mollah M.Y.A., Morkovsky P., Gomes J.A.G., Kesmez M., Parga J., Cocke D.L. Fundamentals, present and future perspective of electrocoagulation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2004, B114:199-210.
6. Mollah M.Y.A., Schennach R., Parga J.R., Cocke D.L. Electrocoagulation (EC)-science and application. J Hazard. Mater. 2001, B84:29-41.
7. Gomes J.A.G., Daida P., Kesmez M., Weir M., Moreno H., Parga J.R., Irwin G., McWhinney H., Grady T., Peterson E., Cocke D.L. Arsenic removal by electrocoagulation using combined Al-Fe electrode system and characterization of products. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 139:220-231.
8. Shafaei A., Rezayee M., Arami M., Nikazar M. Removal of Mn2+ ions from synthetic wastewater by electrocoagulation process. Desalination 2010, 260:23-28.
9. Sayiner G., Kandemirli F., Dimoglo A. Evaluation of boron removal by electrocoagulation using iron and aluminum electrodes. Desalination 2008, 230:205-212.
10. Thella K., Verma B., Srivastava V.C., Srivastava K.K. Electrocoagulation study for the removal of arsenic and chromium from aqueous solution. J. Env. Sci. Health. Part A 2008, 43:554-562.
11. Ghosh D., Solanki H., Purkait M.K. Removal of Fe(II) from tap water by electrocoagulation technique. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 155:135-143.
12. Yidotlesslmaz A.E., Boncukcuoǧlu R. M.M. Kocaker¥m, E. Kocada¥istan, An empirical model for kinetics of boron removal from boron containing wastewaters by the electrocoagulation method in a batch reactor. Desalination 2008, 230:288-297.
13. Golder A.K., Chanda A.K., Samanta A.N., Ray S. Removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution: Electrocoagulation vs chemical coagulation. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2007, 42:2177-2193.
14. Heidmann I., Calmano W. Removal of Cr(VI) from model wastewater by electrocoagulation with Fe electrodes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 61:15-21.
15. Heidmann I., Calmano W. Removal of Zn(II), Cu(II), Ni(II), Ag(II) and Cr(VI) present in aqueous solutions by aluminum electrocoagulation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 152:934-941.
16. Zaroual Z., Chaair H., Essadki A.H., EI Ass K., Azzi M. Optimizing the removal of trivalent chromium by electrocoagulation using experimental design. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 148:488-495.
17. Olmez T. The optimization of Cr(VI) reduction and removal by electrocoagulation using response surface methodology. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162:1371-1378.
18. Bhatti M.S., Reddy A.S., Thukral A.K. Electrocoagulation removal of Cr(VI) from simulated wastewater using response surface methodology. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 172:839-845.
19. Mouedhen G., Feki M., Wery M.D.P., Ayedi H.F. Electrochemical removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous media using iron and aluminum as electrode materials: Towards a better understanding of the involved phenomena. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 168:983-991.
20. Aber S., Amani-Ghadim A.R., Mirzajani V. Removal of Cr(VI) from polluted solutions by electrocoagulation: Modeling of experimental results using artificial neural network. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 171:484-490.
21. Zongo I., Leclerc J.P., Maiga H.A., Wethe J., Lapicque F. Removal of hexavalent chromium from industrial wastewater by electrocoagulation: A comprehensive comparison of aluminum and iron electrodes. Sep. Purif. Tech. 2009, 66:159-166.
22. Narayana N.V., Ganesan M. Use of adsorption using granular activated carbon (GAC) for the enhancement of removal of chromium from synthetic wastewater by electrocoagulation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161:575-580.
23. Malakootian M., Mansoorian H.J., Moosazadeh M. Performance evaluation of electrocoagulation process using iron-rod electrodes for removing hardness from drinking water. Desalination 2010, 255:67-71.
24. Daneshvar N., Khataee A.R., Djafarzadeh N. The use of artificial neural network (ANN) for modeling of discoloration of textile dye solution containing C.I. basic yellow 28 by electrocoagulation process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 137:1788-1795.
25. Aleboyeh A., Daneshvar N., Kasiri M.B. Optimization of C.I. Acid Red 14 dye removal by electrocoagulation batch process with response surface methodology. Chem. Eng. Process. 2008, 47:827-832.
26. Zodi S., Potier O., Lapicque F., Leclerc J.P. Treatment of the industrial wastewaters by electrocoagulation: Optimization of coupled electrochemical and sedimentation processes. Desalination 2010, 261:186-190.
27. Korbahti B.K. Response surface optimization of electrochemical treatment of textile dye wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 145:277-286.
28. Korbahti B.K., Tanyolac A. Electrochemical treatment of simulated textile wastewater with industrial components and Levafix Blue CA reactive dye: Optimization through response surface methodology. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 151:422-431.
29. Korbahti B.K., Aktas N., Tanyolaç A. Optimization of electrochemical treatment of industrial paint wastewater with response surface methodology. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 148:83-90.
30. Güven G., Perendeci A., Tanyolaç A. Electrochemical treatment of deproteinated whey wastewater and optimization of treatment conditions with response surface methodology. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 157:69-78.
31. Tir M., Moulai-Mostefa N. Optimization of oil removal from oily wastewater by electrocoagulation using response surface method. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 158:107-115.
32. APHA A.W.W.A. WEF, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 1998, APHA, Washington, DC. 20th ed.
33. Montgomery D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments 2004, Wiley, New York. 5th ed.
34. Draper N.R., Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis 2004, Wiley, New York. 3rd ed.
35. Box G.E.P., Cox D.R. An analysis of transformations. J. R. Stat. Soc., B 1964, 26:211-243.
36. Design-Expert Software Version 8.0.0 User's Guide, 2009.
37. Myers R.H., Montgomery D.C. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments 1995, Wiley, New York.