Comparative study of cellulose waste versus organic waste as substrate in a sulfate reducing bioreactor

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 102, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 4319-4324

  Choudhary, R P ^a   Sheoran, A S ^a  

^a JAI NARAIN VYAS UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Acid mine drainage; Cellulose waste; Substrate; Sulfate reducing bioreactor; Treatment

Indexed keywords

ACID MINE DRAINAGE; C/N RATIO; CELLULOSE WASTE; CELLULOSE WASTES; CELLULOSIC WASTES; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; LABORATORY SCALE; METAL REMOVAL; ORGANIC WASTE MATERIALS; ORGANIC WASTES; POLLUTANT REMOVAL EFFICIENCY; SULFATE REDUCING; SULFATE REDUCING BACTERIA; SULFATE REDUCING BIOREACTOR; TREATMENT;

BIODEGRADATION; BIOREACTORS; CELLULOSE; COPPER; DRAINAGE; FERTILIZERS; MANGANESE; MANURES; REMOVAL; SEWAGE; SUBSTRATES;

WASTE TREATMENT;

CELLULOSE; SULFATE;

ACID MINE DRAINAGE; ACIDITY; BIODEGRADATION; BIOREACTOR; CATTLE; CELLULOSE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GOAT; HEAVY METAL; MANURE; ORGANIC POLLUTANT; PH; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; REDUCTION; SUBSTRATE; SULFATE;

ACID MINE DRAINAGE; ACIDITY; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADABILITY; BIOREACTOR; BUFFALO; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COW; GOAT; HEAVY METAL REMOVAL; MANURE; ORGANIC WASTE; PH; POLLUTANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SULFATE REDUCING BACTERIUM;

ACIDS; ANIMALS; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOREACTORS; CELLULOSE; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; METALS; MINING; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; SULFATES; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WASTE PRODUCTS;

CAPRA HIRCUS;

EID: 79551681954     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.126     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Amos P.W., Younger P.L. Substrate characterization for a subsurface reactive barrier to peat colliery spoils leachate. Water Research 2003, 37:108-120.
2. AOAC Official Methods of Analysis 1980, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC. 13th ed.
3. Bechard G., Yamazaki H., Gould W.D., Bedard P. Use of cellulosic substrates for the microbial treatmental of acid mine drainage. Journal of Environmental Quality 1994, 23:111-116.
4. Benner S.G., Blowes D.W., Ptacek C.J., Mayer K.U. Rates of sulfate reduction and metal sulfide precipitation in a permeable reactive barrier. Applied Geochemistry 2002, 17:301-320.
5. Blowes D.W., Ptacek C.J., Bain J.G., Waybrant K.R., Robertson W.D. Treatment of mine drainage using in-situ permeable reactive walls. In: Proc. of Sudbury '95- Mining and the Environment, vol. 3, Sudbury, Ontario 1995, CANMET, Canada, Ontario, pp. 979-987.
6. Chang I.S., Sin P.K., Kim B.H. Biological treatment of acid mine drainage under sulphate-reducing conditions with solid waste materials as substrate. Water Research 2000, 34(4):1269-1277.
7. Christensen B., Laake M., Lien T. Treatment of acid mine water by surface reducing bacteria; results from a bench scale experiment. Water Research 1996, 30(7):1617-1624.
8. Cohen R.R.H. Use of microbes for cost reduction of metal removal from metals and mining industry waste streams. Journal of Cleaner Production 2006, 14:1146-1157.
9. Dvorak D.H., Hedin R.S., Edenborn H.M., McIntire P.E. Treatment of metal-contaminated water using bacterial sulfate reduction: results from pilot-scale reactors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 1992, 40:609-616.
10. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 18th ed 1992, APHA-AWWA-WEF, American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
11. Eger P., Lapakko K. Nickel and copper removal from mine drainage by a natural wetland. In: US Bureau of Mines Circular 1988, 9183:301-309.
12. Gibert O., Pablo de J., Cortina J.L., Ayora C. Chemical characterization of natural organic substrates for biological mitigation of acid mine drainage. Water Research 2004, 38:4186-4196.
13. Gibert O., Pablo J.de., Cortina J.L., Ayora C. Sorption studies of Zn(II) and Cu(II) onto vegetal compost used on reactive mixtures for in situ treatment of acid mine drainage. Water Research 2005, 39:2827-2838.
14. Gordon J.A., Burr J.L. Treatment of manganese from mining seep using packed column. Journal of Environmental Engineering 1989, 115(2):386-394.
15. Greben H.A., Maree J.P. Removal of sulphate, metals, and acidity from a nickel and copper mine effluent in a laboratory scale bioreactor. Mine Water Environment 2005, 24:194-198.
16. Gross M.A., Formica S.J., Gandy L.C., Hestir J. A comparison of local waste materials for sulphate reducing wetlands substrate. Constructed Wetlands for Water Quality Improvement 1993, 179-185. CRC Press. G.A. Moshiri (Ed.).
17. Gusek, J. J., Wildeman, T.R., Miller, A., Fricke, J., 1998. The challenges of designing, permitting and building a 1200-GPM passive bioreactor for metal mine drainage, West Fork Mine, Missouri," In: Proc. of the 15th Annual Meeting, ASSMR, St. Louis, Missouri, May 17-21.
18. Hammack R.W., Edenborn H.M., Dvorak D.H. Treatment of water from an open pit copper mine using biogenic sulfide and limestone: a feasibility study. Water Research 1994, 28:2321-2329.
19. Huntsman B.E., Solch J.G., Porter M.D. Utilization of Sphagnum species dominated bog for coal acid mine drainage abatement. GSA (91st annual meeting) abstracts 1978, Toronto, Ontario.
20. Kleinmann R.L.P., Hedin R.S. Treating mine water using passive method. Pollut. Eng. 1993, 25(13):20-22.
21. Logan M.V., Reardon K.F., Figueroa L.A., McLain J.E.T., Ahmann D.M. Microbial community activities during establishment, performance, and decline of bench-scale passive treatment systems for mine drainage. Water Research 2005, 39:4537-4551.
22. Luptakova A., Kusnierova M. Bioremediation of acid mine drainage contaminated by SRB. Hydrometallurgy 2005, 77:97-102.
23. Lyew D., Sheppard J.D. Effects of physical parameters of a gravel bed on the activity of sulphate-reducing bacteria in the presence of acid mine drainage. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 1997, 70:223-230.
24. Mohan D., Chander S. Single component and multi-component adsorption of metal ions by activated carbons. Colloids and Surfaces A 2001, 177:183-196.
25. Neculita C.M., Zagury G.J. Biological treatment of highly contaminated acid mine drainage in batch reactors: Long-term treatment and reactive mixture characterization. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 157(2-3):358-366.
26. Okabe S., Nielsen P.H., Characklis W.G. Factors affecting microbial sulfate reduction by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans in continuous culture: Limiting nutrients and sulfide concentration. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1992, 40(6):725-734.
27. Sheoran A.S., Bhandari S. Treatment of mine water by a microbial mat: Bench scale experiments. Mine Water and the Environment 2005, 24(1):38-42.
28. Sheoran A.S., Sheoran V., Choudhary R.P. Bioremediation of acid-rock drainage by sulphate-reducing prokaryotes: A review. Minerals Engineering 2010, 23(14):1073-1100.
29. Tsukamoto T.K., Miller G.C. Methanol as a carbon source for microbiological treatment of acid mine drainage. Water Research 1999, 33(6):1365-1370.
30. Tuttle J.H., Dugan P.R., Randles C.I. Microbial sulphate reduction and its potential utility as an acid mine water pollution abatement procedure. Applied Microbiology 1969, 17:297-302.
31. Velasco A., Ramirez M., Volke-Sepulveda T., Gonzalez-Sanchez A., Revah S. Evaluation of feed COD/sulfate ratio as a control criterion for the biological hydrogen sulfide production and lead precipitation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2008, 151(2-3):407-413.
32. Wakao N., Takahashi T., Sakurai Y., Shiota H. A treatment of acid mine water using sulphate reducing bacteria. Journal of Fermentation Technology 1979, 57(5):445-452.
33. Waybrant K.R., Blowes D.W., Ptacek C.J. Selection of reactive mixtures for use in permeable reactive walls for treatment of mine drainage. Environmental Science and Technology 1998, 32:1972-1979.
34. Widdel F. Microbiology and ecology of sulfate and sulfur-reducing bacteria. Biology of Anaerobic Microorganisms 1988, 469-586. John Wiley & Sons, New York. A.J.B. Zehnder (Ed.).
35. Zagury G.J., Kulnieks V.I., Neculita C.M. Characterization and reactivity assessment of organic substrates for sulphate-reducing bacteria in acid mine drainage treatment. Chemosphere 2006, 64:944-954.