The Normative Dimensions of Institutional Stewardship: High Reliability, Institutional Constancy, Public Trust and Confidence

Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 51-58

  Egan, M Jude ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; HAZARD MANAGEMENT; INFRASTRUCTURE; INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT; VULNERABILITY;

EID: 79551668797     PISSN: 09660879     EISSN: 14685973     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2010.00632.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bayles, M. and Chapman, B. (1983), Ethical Issues in the Law of Tort, Springer-Verlag, New York.
2. Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society: Toward a New Modernity, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
3. de Bruijne, M., van Eeten, M.J.G., Roe, E. and Schulman, P. (2006), 'Assuring High Reliability of Service Provision in Critical Infrastructures', International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Volume 2, Number 2/3, pp. 231-246.
4. Egan, M.J. (2007), 'Anticipating Future Vulnerability: Defining Characteristics of Increasingly Critical Infrastructure-like Systems', Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Volume 15, Number 1, pp. 4-17.
5. Egan, M.J. (2008) The Stewardship Claim: Managing Hazardous Legal and Regulatory Environments at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Berkeley Doctoral Dissertation, University of California.
6. Frederickson, H.G. and LaPorte, T.R. (2002), 'Airport Security, High Reliability and the Problem of Rationality', Public Administration Review, Volume 62, Special Issue on Homeland Security, pp. 34-44.
7. LaPorte, T.R. (1991), 'The Challenge of Understanding Large Technical Systems', in LaPorte, T.R. (eds.), Social Responses to Large Technical Systems: Control or Anticipation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, pp. 1-4.
8. LaPorte, T.R. (1994), 'Large Technical Systems, Institutional Surprise and Challenges to Political Legitimacy', in Derlien, H.-U., Gerhardt, U. and Scharpf, F. (eds.), Systemrationalitat und Partialinteresse. (Systems Rationality and Partial Interests), Nomos Verlagsgesellscahft, Festschrift fur Renate Mayntz. Baden-Baden, pp. 433-452.
9. LaPorte, T.R. (1995), 'Technologies as Systems and Networks: Issues of Dependence, Public Confidence and Constancy', International Quarterly of Networks and Territory, Volume 21, pp. 37-46.
10. LaPorte, T.R. (2000) Stewardship and the Design of 'Future Friendly' Technologies: Avoiding Operational Strain in Nuclear Materials Management at Scale, Final Report: UCB, LANL Institutional Stewardship Studies, 1998-2000.
11. LaPorte, T.R. and Consolini, P. (1991), 'Working in Practice but not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of High-Reliability Organizations', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Volume 1, pp. 19-47.
12. LaPorte, T.R. and Keller, A. (1996), 'Assuring Institutional Constancy: Requisites for Managing Long-Lived Hazards', Public Administration Review, Volume 56, Number 6, pp. 535-544.
13. LaPorte, T.R. and Metlay, D.S. (1993), Earning Public Trust and Confidence Requisite for Managing Radioactive Wastes. Final Report, Task Force on Radioactive Waste Management, Secretary of Energy Advisory Board, Washington, DC.
14. LaPorte, T.R. and Metlay, D.S. (1996), 'Hazards and Institutional Trustworthiness: Facing a Deficit of Trust', Public Administration Review, Volume 56, Number 4, pp. 341-347.
15. Leopold, A. (1948), A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There, Oxford University Press, New York.
16. Lindblom, C.E. (1959), 'The Science of "Muddling Through"', Public Administration Review, Volume 19, Number 2, pp. 79-88.
17. Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co., 382 P.2d 109 (Okl. 1962).
18. Perrow, C. (1984), Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
19. Rochlin, G.I. (1997), Trapped in the Net, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
20. Rochlin, G.I., LaPorte, T.R. and Roberts, K.H. (1987), 'The Self-Designing High-Reliability Organization: Aircraft Carrier Flight Operations at Sea', Naval War College Review, Volume 40, Number 4, pp. 76-90.
21. Roe, E. and Schulman, P. (2008), High Reliability Management, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
22. Sagan, S.D. (1993), The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
23. Schulman, P.R. (1993), 'The Analysis of High Reliability Organizations: A Comparative Framework', in Roberts, K.H. (eds.), New Challenges to Organization Research: High Reliability Organizations, Macmillan, New York, pp. 33-53.
24. Schulman, P.R. and Roe, E. (2007), 'Designing Infrastructures: Dilemmas of Design and the Reliability of Critical Infrastructures', Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Volume 15, Number 1, pp. 42-49.
25. Sheffi, Y. (2005), The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
26. United States v. Carroll Towing Co. 159 F.2d 169 (2d. Cir. 1947).
27. Winner, L. (1977), Autonomous Technology: Technics-Out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.