What's the problem with the mini-CEX?

Medical Education

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 318-319

  Dijksterhuis, Marja ^a   Schuwirth, Lambert ^b   Braat, Didi ^c   Scheele, Fedde ^d  

^a AMPHIA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d ONZE LIEVE VROUWE GASTHUIS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; LETTER; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 79551666489     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03927.x     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Wilkinson JR, Crossley JGM, Wragg A, Mills P, Cowan G, Wade W. Implementing workplace-based assessment across the medical specialties in the United Kingdom. Med Educ 2008;42 (4):364-73.
2. Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach 2007;29 (9-10):855-71.
3. General Medical Council. Workplace-based Assessment: A Guideline for Implementation. London: GMC 2010.
4. Nicol DJ, Macfarlane-Dick D. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud High Educ 2006;31 (2):199-218.
5. Rushmer R., Themessel-Huber M, Coyle J, Humphris G, Dowell J, Williams B. Is the routine recording of primary care consultations possible ... and desirable? Lessons for researchers from a consultation with multiple stakeholders. Patient Educ Couns 2010; [Epub ahead of print].