Perceptual effects of scene context and viewpoint for virtual pedestrian crowds

ACM Transactions on Applied Perception

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Ennis, Cathy ^a   Peters, Christopher ^a   O'sullivan, Carol ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Perception; Virtual crowd formation

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL SCENES; CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION; PEDESTRIAN MODELS; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL EFFECTS; RANDOM BEHAVIOR; RULES BASED; STILL IMAGES; TOPDOWN; USERS' PERCEPTION; VIRTUAL CROWD FORMATION; VIRTUAL CROWDS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CAMERAS;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 79551664681     PISSN: 15443558     EISSN: 15443965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1870076.1870078     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. BLANZ, V., TARR, M. J., BULTHOFF, H. H., AND VETTER, T. 1999. What object attributes determine canonical views? Perception 28, 575-600.
2. BULTHOFF, H. H., EDELMAN, S. Y., AND TARR, M. J. 1995. How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? Cerebral Cortex 5, 3, 247-260.
3. CHENNEY, S. 2004. Flow tiles. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (SCA'04). ACM, New York, 233-242.
4. ENNIS, C., PETERS, C., AND O'SULLIVAN, C. 2008. Perceptual evaluation of position and orientation context rules for pedestrian formations. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV'08). ACM, New York, 75-82.
5. GALLESE, V., FADIGA, L., FOGASSI, L., AND RIZZOLATTI, G. 1996. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119, 593-609.
6. GOMEZ, P. AND SHUTTER, J. 2008. Memory for objects in canonical and non canonical viewpoints. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 15, 5, 990-944.
7. HELBING, D. AND MOLNÁR, P. 1995. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 51, 5, 4282-4286.
8. HENRY, D. AND FURNESS, T. 1993. Spatial perception in virtual environments: Evaluating an architectural application. In Proceedings of the Annual International Virtual Reality Symposium. IEEE, los Alamitos, CA, 33-40.
9. LAMARCHE, F. AND DONIKIAN, S. 2004. Crowd of virtual humans: a new approach for real time navigation in complex and structured environments. Comput. Graphics Forum 51, 3, 509-518.
10. LEE, K. H., CHOI, M. G., HONG, Q., AND LEE, J. 2007. Group behavior from video: A data-driven approach to crowd simulation. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (SCA'07). ACM, New York, 109-118.
11. LERNER, A., CHRYSANTHOU, Y., AND DANI, L. 2007. Crowds by example. Comput. Graphics Forum 26, 3, 655-664.
12. LYONS, M. J., CAMPBELL, R., PLANTE, A., COLEMAN, M., KAMACHI, M., AND AKAMATSU, S. 2000. The noh mask effect: vertical viewpoint dependence of facial expression perception. Proc. Biol. Sci. 267, 1459, 2239-2245.
13. MCDONNELL, R., NEWELL, F., AND O'SULLIVAN, C. 2007. Smooth movers: Perceptually guided human motion simulation. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (SCA'07). ACM, New York, 259-269.
14. MUSSE, S. R. AND THALMANN, D. 1997. A model of human crowd behavior: Group interrelationship and collision detection analysis. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Animation and Simulation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 39-52.
15. PALMER, S. E. AND ROSCH, P. C. 1981. Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Attention and Performance. 135-151.
16. PELECHANO, N., ALLBECK, J. M., AND BADLER, N. I. 2007. Controlling individual agents in high-density crowd simulation. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Computer animation (SCA'07). ACM, New York, 99-108.
17. PETERS, C., ENNIS, C., MCDONNELL, R., AND O'SULLIVAN, C. 2008. Crowds in context: Evaluating the perceptual plausibility of pedestrian orientations. In Proceedings of Eurographics Short Papers. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
18. PREMACK, D. AND WOODRUFF, G. 1978. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav. Brain Sci. 1, 515-526.
19. REITSMA, P. S. A. AND POLLARD, N. S. 2003. Perceptual metrics for character animation: sensitivity to errors in ballistic motion. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3, 537-542.
20. REYNOLDS, C. W. 1987. Flocks, herds, and schools: A distributed behavioral model. Comput. Graphics 21, 4, 25-34.
21. SCHILBACH, L., WOHLSCHLAEGER, A., KRAEMER, N., NEWEN, A., SHAH, N., FINK, G., AND VOGELEY, K. 2006. Being with virtual others: Neural correlates of social interaction. Neuropsychologia 44, 5, 718-730.
22. SHAO, W. AND TERZOPOULOS, D. 2005. Autonomous pedestrians. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (SCA'05). ACM, New York, 19-28.
23. TARR, M. J. 1995. Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 2, 1, 5582.
24. YARBUS, A. L. AND HAIGH, B. 1973. Eye Movements and Vision. Plenum Press, New York.