The influence of partial implant-supported restorations on chewing side preference

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 165-169

  Nissan, J ^a   Berman, O ^a   Gross, O ^a   Haim, B ^a   Chaushu, G ^b  

^a Department of Oral Rehabilitation ^*  (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Chewing; Implant supported restoration; Side preference

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHEWING GUM; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTURE; EAR; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; FOOT; HAND; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBLE; MASTICATION; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

ADULT; AGED; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHEWING GUM; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, PARTIAL; EAR; FEMALE; FOOT; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MALE; MANDIBLE; MASTICATION; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS; OCULAR PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; SEX FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79551660743     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: 13652842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02142.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Mohl ND, Zarb GA, Carlson GE, Ruge JD. A Textbook of Occlusion, Vol. 10. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc.; 1988: 145-151.
2. Christensen LV, Radue T. Lateral preference in mastication. A feasibility study. J Oral Rehabil. 1985;12:421-427.
3. Pond LH, Berbhe N, Barnwell GM. Occlusion and chewing side preference. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55:498-500.
4. Christensen LV, Radue T. Lateral preference in mastication: an electromyographic study. J Oral Rehabil. 1985;12:429-434.
5. Kazazoglu E, Health MR, Muller F. A simple test for determination of preferred chewing side. J Oral Rehabil. 1994;21:723-724.
6. Ahlgren J. Pattern of chewing and malocclusion of teeth. A clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1967;25:3.
7. Duilio G. Laterality preference, electrophysiology and the brain. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1979;19:105-123.
8. Nissan J, Gross MD, Shifman A, Tzadok L, Assif D. Chewing side preference as a type of hemispheric laterality. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31:412-416.
9. Wilding RJ, Adams LP, Lewin A. Absence of association between a preferred chewing side and its area of functional contact in human dentition. Arch Oral Biol. 1992;37:423.
10. Wilding RJ. The association between chewing efficiency and occlusal contact area in man. Arch Oral Biol. 1993;38:589-596.
11. Bates JF, Stafford GD, Harrison A. Masticatory function-a review of literature. J Oral Rehabil. 1975;2:281-301.
12. Hoogmartens MJ, Stuyck J. Stretch sensitivity of primary spindle endings in masseter and temporalis muscle: lateralization and association with unilateral preference pattern of mastication. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1980;20:369-381.
13. Delport HP, De Laat A, Nijs J, Hoogmartens MJ. Preference pattern of mastication during the first chewing cycle. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983;23:491.
14. Hoogmartens MJ, Caubergh MAA. Chewing side preference during the first chewing cycle as a new type of lateral preference in man. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987;27:3-6.
15. Varela JMF, Castro NB, Biedma BM, Da Silva Domingues JS, Quintanilla JS, Munoz FM et al. A comparison of the methods used to determine chewing preference. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:990-994.
16. Weber HP, Sukotio C. Does the type of implant prosthesis affect outcomes in the partially edentulous patient? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(Suppl):140-172.
17. Lundgren D, Laurell L. Occlusal force pattern during chewing and biting in dentitions restored with fixed bridges of cross-arch extension. I. bilateral end abutments. J Oral Rehabil. 1986;13:57-71.
18. Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:26-35.
19. Gross MD. Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts. Aust Dent J. 2008;1:S60-S68.