A method for evaluating the relation between sound source segregation and masking

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 129, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Lutfi, Robert A ^a   Liu, Ching Ju ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOUND SOURCE; SOUND SOURCE SEGREGATION;

ACOUSTIC GENERATORS;

SEGREGATION (METALLOGRAPHY);

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79551657885     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.3519871     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ANSI S3.6-1996 (1996). American National Standard Specification for Audiometers (American National Standards Institute, New York).
2. Berg, B. G. (1990). Observer efficiency and weights in a multiple observation task., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 149-158.
3. Bregman, A. S. (1990) Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 213-393.
4. Carlyon, R. P., and Moore, B. C. J. (1986). Continuous versus gated pedestals and the severe departure' from Weber's law., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79, 453-460.
5. Durlach, N. (2006). Auditory masking: Need for improved conceptual structure., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 1787.
6. Green, D. M. (1988). Profile Analysis: Auditory Intensity Discrimination. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, England), pp. 3-21.
7. Houtgast, T. (1972). Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 51, 1885-1894.
8. Hukin, R. W., and Darwin, C. J. (1995). Comparison of the effect of onset asynchrony on auditory grouping in pitch matching and vowel identification., Percept. Psychophys. 57, 191-196.
9. Kidd, G., Jr., Mason, C. R., Deliwala, P. S., Woods, W. S., and Colburn, H. S. (1994). Reducing informational masking by sound segregation., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 3475-3480.
10. Lutfi, R. A. (1995). Correlation coefficients and correlation ratios as estimates of observer weights in multiple-observation tasks., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 1333-1334.
11. Lutfi, R. A., Liu, C. J., and Stoelinga, C. N. J. (2008). Level dominance in sound source identification., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, 3784-3792.
12. Micheyl, C., and Oxenham, A. J. (2010). Objective and subjective psychophysical measures of auditory stream segregation and integration., J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 11(4), 709-724.
13. Morse, P. M., and Ingard, K. U. (1968). Theoretical Acoustics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.), pp. 175-191.
14. Sachs, M. B., and Kiang, N. Y. S. (1968). Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 43, 1120-1128.
15. Werner, L. A., and Bargones, J. Y. (1991). Sources of auditory masking in infants: Distraction effects., Percept. Psychophys. 50, 405-412.
16. Wier, C. C., Jesteadt, W., and Green, D. M. (1977). Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61, 178-184. (Pubitemid 8027258)