The implications of human stem cell differentiation to endothelial cell via fluid shear stress in cardiovascular regenerative medicine: A review

Current Pharmaceutical Design

Volumn 16, Issue 34, 2010, Pages 3848-3861

  Tan, Aaron ^a   Sumpio, Bauer E ^b   Lee, Samuel ^c   Seifalian, Alexander M ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d ROYAL FREE LONDON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular; Mechanotransduction; Pharmacology; Shear stress; Stem cell

Indexed keywords

ALPHA5 INTEGRIN; BETA1 INTEGRIN; CAVEOLIN; CD31 ANTIGEN; CHLORIDE CHANNEL; COPPER ZINC SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE; CYCLOOXYGENASE 2; ENDOTHELIAL NITRIC OXIDE SYNTHASE; EPITHELIAL SODIUM CHANNEL; EVEROLIMUS; G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; HISTONE DEACETYLASE 3; INTERSTITIAL COLLAGENASE; MESSENGER RNA; NITRIC OXIDE; PACLITAXEL; POLYCYSTIN 1; POLYCYSTIN 2; POTASSIUM CHANNEL; RAPAMYCIN; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL CADHERIN; VASCULOTROPIN; VASCULOTROPIN RECEPTOR 1; VASCULOTROPIN RECEPTOR 2; VON WILLEBRAND FACTOR; ZOTAROLIMUS;

ANTINEOPLASTIC ACTIVITY; BARE METAL STENT; BLOOD VESSEL WALL; CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY; CARDIOVASCULAR FUNCTION; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; DNA METHYLATION; DRUG ELUTING STENT; EMBRYO; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; GLYCOCALYX; HISTONE ACETYLATION; HISTONE METHYLATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INFECTION SENSITIVITY; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; NEUTROPENIA; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; REVIEW; SHEAR STRESS; SIDE EFFECT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STEM CELL; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; THROMBOSIS; VASCULARIZATION;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; ENDOTHELIUM, VASCULAR; HUMANS; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; STEM CELLS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 79551638815     PISSN: 13816128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/138161210794455058     Document Type: Review

References (106)

1. Hansson EM, Lindsay ME, Chien KR. Regeneration next: toward heart stem cell therapeutics. Cell Stem Cell 2009; 5: 364-77.
2. Passier R, van Laake LW, Mummery CL. Stem-cell-based therapy and lessons from the heart. Nature 2008; 453: 322-9.
3. World Health Organization. Cardiovascular Diseases[Online]. 2009 Sep,[cited 2010]. Available from: http: //www.who.int/ mediacentre/factsheets/fs317/en/index.html
4. Discher DE, Mooney DJ, Zandstra PW. Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells. Science 2009; 324: 1673-7.
5. Stolberg S, McCloskey KE. Can shear stress direct stem cell fate? Biotechnol Prog 2009; 25: 10-9.
6. Singh IM, Filby SJ, El Sakr F, et al. Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for treatment of bare-metal in-stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 76: 257-62.
7. Greenhalgh J, Hockenhull J, Rao N, Dundar Y, Dickson RC, Bagust A. Drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents for angina or acute coronary syndromes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 5: CD004587.
8. Kirchner RM, Abbott JD. Update on the everolimus-eluting coronary stent system: results and implications from the SPIRIT clinical trial program. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2009; 5: 1089-97.
9. Nakazawa G, Finn AV, John MC, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. The significance of preclinical evaluation of sirolimus-, paclitaxel-, and zotarolimus-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol 2007; 100: 36M-44.
10. Bartorelli AL, Serruys PW, Miquel-Hebert K, Yu S, Pierson W, Stone GW. An everolimus-eluting stent versus a paclitaxel-eluting stent in small vessel coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis from the SPIRIT II and SPIRIT III trials. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 76: 60-6.
11. PubMed Health. Sirolimus[Online]. 2010 Feb,[cited 2010]. Available from: http: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/ PMH0000206
12. Abe M, Kimura T, Morimoto T, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stent versus balloon angioplasty for sirolimus-eluting stent restenosis: Insights from the j-Cypher Registry. Circulation 2010; 122: 42-51.
13. Harvey RA, Champe PC, Finkel R, Cubeddu L, Clarke MA. Lippincott's Illustrated Reviews: Pharmacology. Fourth Edition. USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2009; pp. 492-3.
14. MedlinePlus. Paclitaxel Injection[Online]. 2008 Sep,[cited 2010]. Available from: http: //www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/ meds/a607070.html
15. Brilakis ES, Lasala JM, Cox DA, et al. Outcomes after implantation of the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent in saphenous vein graft lesions: results from the ARRIVE (TAXUS Peri- Approval Registry: A Multicenter Safety Surveillance) program. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 742-50.
16. Harvey RA, Champe PC, Finkel R, Cubeddu L, Clarke MA. Lippincott's Illustrated Reviews: Pharmacology, Fourth Edition. USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2009; pp. 476-7.
17. Paraskevas KI, Mikhailidis DP, Veith FJ. Mechanisms to explain the poor results of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in symptomatic patients to date and options to improve CAS outcomes. J Vasc Surg2010.
18. Athyros VG, Tziomalos K, Florentin M, Karagiannis A, Mikhailidis DP. Statin loading in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes: a new pleiotropic effect? Curr Med Res Opin 2010; 26: 839-42.
19. Roffman DS. Considerations in patients receiving oral antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2010; 67: S18-24.
20. Harvey RA, Champe PC, Finkel R, Cubeddu L, Clarke MA. Lippincott's Illustrated Reviews: Pharmacology, Fourth Edition. USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2009; pp. 233-4.
21. Rashid ST, Fuller B, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM. Tissue engineering of a hybrid bypass graft for coronary and lower limb bypass surgery. FASEB J 2008; 22: 2084-9.
22. Kidane AG, Burriesci G, Edirisinghe M, Ghanbari H, Bonhoeffer P, Seifalian AM. A novel nanocomposite polymer for development of synthetic heart valve leaflets. Acta Biomater 2009; 5: 2409-17.
23. de Mel A, Punshon G, Ramesh B, et al. In situ endothelialization potential of a biofunctionalised nanocomposite biomaterial-based small diameter bypass graft. Biomed Mater Eng 2009; 19: 317-31.
24. Chien KR, Domian IJ, Parker KK. Cardiogenesis and the complex biology of regenerative cardiovascular medicine. Science 2008; 322: 1494-7.
25. Topper JN, Gimbrone MA, Jr. Blood flow and vascular gene expression: fluid shear stress as a modulator of endothelial phenotype. Mol Med Today 1999; 5: 40-6.
26. Butcher DT, Alliston T, Weaver VM. A tense situation: forcing tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2009; 9: 108-22.
27. Hahn C, Schwartz MA. Mechanotransduction in vascular physiology and atherogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10: 53-62.
28. Fisher C, Rossmann JS. Effect of non-newtonian behavior on hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysms. J Biomech Eng 2009; 131:091004.
29. Sultanov RA, Guster D. Full dimensional computer simulations to study pulsatile blood flow in vessels, aortic arch and bifurcated veins: Investigation of blood viscosity and turbulent effects. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009; 1: 4704-10.
30. Munn LL, Dupin MM. Blood cell interactions and segregation in flow. Ann Biomed Eng 2008; 36: 534-44.
31. Cunningham KS, Gotlieb AI. The role of shear stress in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Lab Invest 2005; 85: 9-23.
32. Resnick N, Yahav H, Shay-Salit A, et al. Fluid shear stress and the vascular endothelium: for better and for worse. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2003; 81: 177-99.
33. Yoshizumi M, Abe J, Tsuchiya K, Berk BC, Tamaki T. Stress and vascular responses: atheroprotective effect of laminar fluid shear stress in endothelial cells: possible role of mitogen-activated protein kinases. J Pharmacol Sci 2003; 91: 172-6.
34. Yang Z, Wang JM, Wang LC, et al. In vitro shear stress modulates antithrombogenic potentials of human endothelial progenitor cells. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2007; 23: 121-7.
35. Chiu JJ, Usami S, Chien S. Vascular endothelial responses to altered shear stress: pathologic implications for atherosclerosis. Ann Med 2009; 41: 19-28.
36. Patwari P, Lee RT. Mechanical control of tissue morphogenesis. Circ Res 2008; 103: 234-43.
37. Lucitti JL, Jones EA, Huang C, Chen J, Fraser SE, Dickinson ME. Vascular remodeling of the mouse yolk sac requires hemodynamic force. Development 2007; 134: 3317-26.
38. Franco CA, Liebner S, Gerhardt H. Vascular morphogenesis: a Wnt for every vessel? Curr Opin Genet Dev 2009; 19: 476-83.
39. Metallo CM, Vodyanik MA, de Pablo JJ, Slukvin, II, Palecek SP. The response of human embryonic stem cell-derived endothelial cells to shear stress. Biotechnol Bioeng 2008; 100: 830-7.
40. White CR, Frangos JA. The shear stress of it all: the cell membrane and mechanochemical transduction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2007; 362: 1459-67.
41. Sato M, Ohashi T. Biorheological views of endothelial cell responses to mechanical stimuli. Biorheology 2005; 42: 421-41.
42. McCue S, Noria S, Langille BL. Shear-induced reorganization of endothelial cell cytoskeleton and adhesion complexes. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2004; 14: 143-51.
43. Noria S, Xu F, McCue S, Jones M, Gotlieb AI, Langille BL. Assembly and reorientation of stress fibers drives morphological changes to endothelial cells exposed to shear stress. Am J Pathol 2004; 164: 1211-23.
44. Tao J, Yang Z, Wang JM, Tu C, Pan SR. Effects of fluid shear stress on eNOS mRNA expression and NO production in human endothelial progenitor cells. Cardiology 2006; 106: 82-8.
45. Tao J, Yang Z, Wang JM, Wang LC, Luo CF, Tang AL, et al. Shear stress increases Cu/Zn SOD activity and mRNA expression in human endothelial progenitor cells. J Hum Hypertens 2007; 21: 353-8.
46. Ando J, Yamamoto K. Vascular mechanobiology: endothelial cell responses to fluid shear stress. Circ J 2009; 73: 1983-92.
47. Geiger B, Bershadsky A. Exploring the neighborhood: adhesioncoupled cell mechanosensors. Cell 2002; 110: 139-42.
48. Barakat AI. A model for shear stress-induced deformation of a flow sensor on the surface of vascular endothelial cells. J Theor Biol 2001; 210: 221-36.
49. Barakat AI, Lieu DK, Gojova A. Secrets of the code: do vascular endothelial cells use ion channels to decipher complex flow signals? Biomaterials 2006; 27: 671-8.
50. Gautam M, Gojova A, Barakat AI. Flow-activated ion channels in vascular endothelium. Cell Biochem Biophys 2006; 46: 277-84.
51. Althaus M, Bogdan R, Clauss WG, Fronius M. Mechanosensitivity of epithelial sodium channels (ENaCs): laminar shear stress increases ion channel open probability. FASEB J 2007; 21: 2389-99.
52. Fronius M, Clauss WG. Mechano-sensitivity of ENaC: may the (shear) force be with you. Pflugers Arch 2008; 455: 775-85.
53. Carattino MD, Sheng S, Kleyman TR. Epithelial Na+ channels are activated by laminar shear stress. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 4120-6.
54. Inoue R, Jian Z, Kawarabayashi Y. Mechanosensitive TRP channels in cardiovascular pathophysiology. Pharmacol Ther 2009; 123: 371-85.
55. Sharif-Naeini R, Folgering JH, Bichet D, et al. Polycystin-1 and -2 dosage regulates pressure sensing. Cell 2009; 139: 587-96.
56. Tarbell JM, Ebong EE. The endothelial glycocalyx: a mechanosensor and -transducer. Sci Signal 2008; 1: pt8.
57. Gouverneur M, Spaan JA, Pannekoek H, Fontijn RD, Vink H. Fluid shear stress stimulates incorporation of hyaluronan into endothelial cell glycocalyx. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006; 290: H458-2.
58. Williams TM, Lisanti MP. The Caveolin genes: from cell biology to medicine. Ann Med 2004; 36: 584-95.
59. Frank PG, Lisanti MP. Role of caveolin-1 in the regulation of the vascular shear stress response. J Clin Invest 2006; 116: 1222-5.
60. Rath G, Dessy C, Feron O. Caveolae, caveolin and control of vascular tone: nitric oxide (NO) and endothelium derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) regulation. J Physiol Pharmacol 2009; 60 Suppl 4: 105-109.
61. Tian J, Hou Y, Lu Q, et al. A novel role for caveolin-1 in regulating endothelial nitric oxide synthase activation in response to H(2)O(2) and shear stress. Free Radic Biol Med 2010; 49(2): 159-70.
62. Ishida T, Takahashi M, Corson MA, Berk BC. Fluid shear stressmediated signal transduction: how do endothelial cells transduce mechanical force into biological responses? Ann N Y Acad Sci 1997; 811: 12-23; discussion 23-14.
63. Shirota T, He H, Yasui H, Matsuda T. Human endothelial progenitor cell-seeded hybrid graft: proliferative and antithrombogenic potentials in vitro and fabrication processing. Tissue Eng 2003; 9: 127-36.
64. Hierck BP, Van der Heiden K, Alkemade FE, et al. Primary cilia sensitize endothelial cells for fluid shear stress. Dev Dyn 2008; 237: 725-35.
65. Poelmann RE, Van der Heiden K, Gittenberger-de Groot A, Hierck BP. Deciphering the endothelial shear stress sensor. Circulation 2008; 117: 1124-6.
66. Nauli SM, Kawanabe Y, Kaminski JJ, Pearce WJ, Ingber DE, Zhou J. Endothelial cilia are fluid shear sensors that regulate calcium signaling and nitric oxide production through polycystin-1. Circulation 2008; 117: 1161-71.
67. Zhou J. Polycystins and primary cilia: primers for cell cycle progression. Annu Rev Physiol 2009; 71: 83-113.
68. Chachisvilis M, Zhang YL, Frangos JA. G protein-coupled receptors sense fluid shear stress in endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 15463-8.
69. Li YS, Haga JH, Chien S. Molecular basis of the effects of shear stress on vascular endothelial cells. J Biomech 2005; 38: 1949-71.
70. Uhlenbrock K, Huber J, Ardati A, Busch AE, Kostenis E. Fluid shear stress differentially regulates gpr3, gpr6, and gpr12 expression in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Cell Physiol Biochem 2003; 13: 75-84.
71. Malek AM, Jiang L, Lee I, Sessa WC, Izumo S, Alper SL. Induction of nitric oxide synthase mRNA by shear stress requires intracellular calcium and G-protein signals and is modulated by PI3 kinase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1999; 254: 231-42.
72. Cai WJ, Li MB, Wu X, et al. Activation of the integrins alpha 5beta 1 and alpha v beta 3 and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) during arteriogenesis. Mol Cell Biochem 2009; 322: 161-9.
73. McIlhenny SE, Hager ES, Grabo DJ, et al. Linear shear conditioning improves vascular graft retention of adipose-derived stem cells by upregulation of the alpha5beta1 integrin. Tissue Eng Part A 2010; 16: 245-55.
74. Petzold T, Orr AW, Hahn C, Jhaveri KA, Parsons JT, Schwartz MA. Focal adhesion kinase modulates activation of NF-kappaB by flow in endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2009; 297: C814-22.
75. Choi CK, Helmke BP. Short-term shear stress induces rapid actin dynamics in living endothelial cells. Mol Cell Biomech 2008; 5: 247-58.
76. Osborn EA, Rabodzey A, Dewey CF, Jr., Hartwig JH. Endothelial actin cytoskeleton remodeling during mechanostimulation with fluid shear stress. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2006; 290: C444-52.
77. Stamatas GN, McIntire LV. Rapid flow-induced responses in endothelial cells. Biotechnol Prog 2001; 17: 383-402.
78. Fujiwara K. Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 and mechanotransduction in vascular endothelial cells. J Intern Med 2006; 259: 373-80.
79. Otte LA, Bell KS, Loufrani L, et al. Rapid changes in shear stress induce dissociation of a G alpha(q/11)-platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 complex. J Physiol 2009; 587: 2365-73.
80. Jaalouk DE, Lammerding J. Mechanotransduction gone awry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10: 63-73.
81. Guilak F, Cohen DM, Estes BT, Gimble JM, Liedtke W, Chen CS. Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell 2009; 5: 17-26.
82. Zhang P, Baxter J, Vinod K, Tulenko TN, Di Muzio PJ. Endothelial differentiation of amniotic fluid-derived stem cells: synergism of biochemical and shear force stimuli. Stem Cells Dev 2009; 18: 1299-308.
83. DiMuzio P, Tulenko T. Tissue engineering applications to vascular bypass graft development: the use of adipose-derived stem cells. J Vasc Surg 2007; 45 Suppl A: A99-103.
84. Murphy S, Rosli S, Acharya R, et al. Amnion epithelial cell isolation and characterization for clinical use. Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol 2010; Chapter 1: Unit 1E 6.
85. Chao H, Hirschi KK. Hemato-vascular origins of endothelial progenitor cells? Microvasc Res 2010; 79(3): 169-73.
86. Ribatti D. The discovery of endothelial progenitor cells. An historical review. Leuk Res 2007; 31: 439-44.
87. Alison M. An introduction to stem cell and progenitor cell biology. In: Habib N, Gordon M, Levicar N, Jiao L, Thomas-Black G, Eds. Stem cell repair and regeneration, First Edition. UK: Imperial College Press 2009; pp. 1-20.
88. Wang XL, Fu A, Raghavakaimal S, Lee HC. Proteomic analysis of vascular endothelial cells in response to laminar shear stress. Proteomics 2007; 7: 588-96.
89. Masumura T, Yamamoto K, Shimizu N, Obi S, Ando J. Shear stress increases expression of the arterial endothelial marker ephrinB2 in murine ES cells via the VEGF-Notch signaling pathways. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2009; 29: 2125-31.
90. Siekmann AF, Covassin L, Lawson ND. Modulation of VEGF signalling output by the Notch pathway. Bioessays 2008; 30: 303-13.
91. Nikolova-Krstevski V, Bhasin M, Otu HH, Libermann T, Oettgen P. Gene expression analysis of embryonic stem cells expressing VE-cadherin (CD144) during endothelial differentiation. BMC Genomics 2008; 9: 240.
92. Wu CC, Chao YC, Chen CN, et al. Synergism of biochemical and mechanical stimuli in the differentiation of human placenta-derived multipotent cells into endothelial cells. J Biomech 2008; 41: 813-21.
93. Rossig L, Urbich C, Bruhl T, et al. Histone deacetylase activity is essential for the expression of HoxA9 and for endothelial commitment of progenitor cells. J Exp Med 2005; 201: 1825-35.
94. Suzuki H, Watabe T, Kato M, Miyazawa K, Miyazono K. Roles of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 signaling in differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cell-derived vascular progenitor cells into endothelial cells. Blood 2005; 105: 2372-9.
95. Daculsi R, Grellier M, Remy M, et al. Unusual transduction response of progenitor-derived and mature endothelial cells exposed to laminar pulsatile shear stress. J Biomech 2008; 41: 2781-5.
96. Ye C, Bai L, Yan ZQ, Wang YH, Jiang ZL. Shear stress and vascular smooth muscle cells promote endothelial differentiation of endothelial progenitor cells via activation of Akt. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2008; 23 Suppl 1: S118-24.
97. Yamamoto K, Takahashi T, Asahara T, et al. Proliferation, differentiation, and tube formation by endothelial progenitor cells in response to shear stress. J Appl Physiol 2003; 95: 2081-8.
98. Krause B, Sobrevia L, Casanello P. Epigenetics: new concepts of old phenomena in vascular physiology. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2009; 7: 513-20.
99. Illi B, Scopece A, Nanni S, et al. Epigenetic histone modification and cardiovascular lineage programming in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to laminar shear stress. Circ Res 2005; 96: 501-8.
100. Zeng L, Xiao Q, Margariti A, et al. HDAC3 is crucial in shear- and VEGF-induced stem cell differentiation toward endothelial cells. J Cell Biol 2006; 174: 1059-69.
101. Zampetaki A, Zeng L, Margariti A, et al. Histone deacetylase 3 is critical in endothelial survival and atherosclerosis development in response to disturbed flow. Circulation 2010; 121: 132-42.
102. Margariti A, Zampetaki A, Xiao Q, et al. Histone deacetylase 7 controls endothelial cell growth through modulation of betacatenin. Circ Res 2010; 106: 1202-11.
103. Reneman RS, Arts T, Hoeks AP. Wall shear stress--an important determinant of endothelial cell function and structure--in the arterial system in vivo. Discrepancies with theory. J Vasc Res 2006; 43: 251-69.
104. Katritsis D, Kaiktsis L, Chaniotis A, Pantos J, Efstathopoulos EP, Marmarelis V. Wall shear stress: theoretical considerations and methods of measurement. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2007; 49: 307-29.
105. Alobaid N, Salacinski HJ, Sales KM, et al. Nanocomposite containing bioactive peptides promote endothelialisation by circulating progenitor cells: an in vitro evaluation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006; 32: 76-83.
106. Joner M, Nakazawa G, Finn AV, et al. Endothelial cell recovery between comparator polymer-based drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 333-42.