Relationships between foot type and dynamic rearfoot frontal plane motion

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Chuter, Vivienne H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551637131     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17571146     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-3-9     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Kaufman K, Brodine S, Shaffer R, Johnson C, Cullison T. The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Am J Sports Med 1999, 27:585-593.
2. Murphy D, Connolly D, Beynnon B. Risk factors for lower extremity injury: a review of the literature. Br J Sports Med 2003, 37(1):13-29. 10.1136/bjsm.37.1.13, 1724594, 12547739.
3. Williams I, McClay IS, Hamill J. Arch structure and injury patterns in runners. Clin Biomech 2001, 16(4):341-347.
4. Hunt AE, Fahey AJ, Smith RM. Static measures of calcaneal deviation and arch angle as predictors of rearfoot motion during walking. Aust J Physiother 2000, 46(1):9-16.
5. McPoil TG, Cornwall MW. The relationship between static lower extremity measurements and rearfoot motion during walking. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996, 24(5):309-314.
6. Hamill J, Bates BT, Knutzen KM, Kirkpatrick GM. Relationship between selected static and dynamic lower extremity measures. Clin Biomech 1989, 4:217-225.
7. McPoil TG, Cornwall MW. Relationship between three static angles of the rearfoot and the pattern of rearfoot motion during walking. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996, 23(6):370-375.
8. Nakhaee Z, Rahimi A, Abaee M, Rezasoltani A, Kalantari KK. The relationship between the height of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) and the ankle and knee injuries in professional runners. The Foot 2008, 18(2):84-90. 10.1016/j.foot.2008.01.004, 20307417.
9. Redmond AC, Crosbie J, Ouvrier RA. Development and validation of a novel rating system for scoring standing foot posture: The Foot Posture Index. Clin Biomech 2006, 21(1):89-98.
10. Nielsen RG, Rathleff M, Kersting UG, Simonsen O, Moelgaard C, Jensen K, Olesen CG, Lundbye-Christensen S, Kaalund S. The predictive value of the foot posture index on dynamic function. J Foot Ankle Res 2008, 1(Suppl 1):O37.
11. Cavanagh PR, Rodgers MM. The arch index: A useful measure from footprints. J Biomech 1987, 20(5):547-551. 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90255-7, 3611129.
12. Payne C, Chuter V. The clash between theory and science on the kinematic effectiveness of foot orthoses. Clin Pod Med Surg 2001, 18(4):705-13.
13. Diss CE. The reliability of kinetic and kinematic variables used to analyse normal running gait. Gait Posture 2001, 14(2):98-103. 10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00125-4, 11544060.
14. Keenan AM, Redmond AC, Horton M, Conaghan PG, Tennant A. The foot posture index: rasch analysis of a novel, foot-specific outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2007, 88(1):88-93.
15. Minichiello V, Sullivan G, Greenwood K, Axford R, . eds Handbook of Reasearch Methods in Health Sciences 1999, Addison Wesley Longman Australia Pty Limited: Sydney, eds.
16. Cornwall MW, McPoil TG. Classification of frontal plane rearfoot motion patterns during the stance phase of walking. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2009, 99(5):399-405.
17. Dorsey W, McClay DI, Baitch SP. Effect of inverted orthoses on lower extremity mechanics in runners. Med Sci Sport Exerc 2003, 35(12):2060-2068.
18. Stacoff A, Reinschmidt C, Nigg BM, van den Bogert AJ, Lundberg A, Denoth J, Stüssi E. Effects of foot orthoses on skeletal motion during running. Clin Biomech 2000, 15(1):54-64.