Use of fibrin glue in the management of recurrent pterygium by conjunctival autograft

Saudi Medical Journal

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1326-1330

  Malik, Virendra K ^a   Kumar, Sandeep ^a  

^a SUBHARTI MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FIBRIN GLUE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOGRAFT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EPIPHORA; EYE IRRITATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INDIA; MALE; MEDICAL SCHOOL; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE INFLAMMATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PTERYGIUM; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SUTURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CONJUNCTIVA; FIBRIN TISSUE ADHESIVE; HUMANS; PTERYGIUM; RECURRENCE; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS;

EID: 79551630267     PISSN: 03795284     EISSN: 16583175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Díaz L, Villegas VM, Emanuelli A, Izquierdo NJ. Efficacy and safety of intraoperative mitomycin C as adjunct therapy for pterygium surgery. Cornea 2008; 27: 1119-1121.
2. Rahman A, Yahya K, Ul Hasan KS. Recurrence rate of pterygium following surgical excision with intraoperative versus postoperative mitomycin-C. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2008; 18: 489-492.
3. Luanratanakorn P, Ratanapakorn T, Suwan-Apichon O, Chuck RS. Randomised controlled study of conjunctival autograft versus amniotic membrane graft in pterygium excision. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 1476-1480.
4. Katircioǧlu YA, Altiparmak UE, Duman S. Comparison of three methods for the treatment of pterygium: amniotic membrane graft, conjunctival autograft and conjunctival autograft plus mitomycin C. Orbit 2007; 26: 5-13.
5. Ozer A, Yildirim N, Erol N, Yurdakul S. Long-term results of bare sclera, limbal-conjunctival autograft and amniotic membrane graft techniques in primary pterygium excisions. Ophthalmologica 2009; 223: 269-273.
6. Memarzadeh F, Fahd AK, Shamie N, Chuck RS. Comparison of de-epithelialized amniotic membrane transplantation and conjunctival autograft after primary pterygium excision. Eye (Lond) 2008; 22: 107-112.
7. Oguz H. Amniotic membrane grafting versus conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2004; 32: 501-504.
8. Oguz H, Kilitcioglu A, Yasar M. Limbal conjunctival miniautografting for preventing recurrence after pterygium surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol 2006; 16: 209-213.
9. Kuzmanović Elabjer B, Busić M, Elabjer E. Retrospective clinical analysis of free conjunctival autograft in treatment of pterygia. Coll Antropol 2008; 32: 303-306.
10. Syam PP, Eleftheriadis H, Liu CS. Inferior conjunctival autograft for primary pterygia. Ophthalmology 2003; 110; 806-810.
11. Dekaris I, Gabrie N, Karaman Z,Mravicic I, Kastelan S. Limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation for recurrent pterygium. Eur J Ophthalmol 2002; 12; 177-182.
12. Mejia LF, Sanchez JG, Escobar H. Management of primary pterygia using free conjunctival and limbal conjunctival autografts without antimetabolites. Cornea 2005; 24: 972-975.
13. Varssano D, Michaeli-Cohen A, Loewenstein A. Excision of pterygium and conjunctival autograft. Isr Med Assoc J 2002; 4: 1097-100.
14. Ayala M. Results of pterygium surgery using a biologic adhesive. Cornea 2008; 27: 663-667.
15. Kheirkhah A, Casas V, Sheha H, Raju VK, Tseng SC. Role of conjunctival inflammation in surgical outcome after amniotic membrane transplantation with or without fibrin glue for pterygium. Cornea 2008; 27: 56-63.
16. Jiang J, Yang Y, Zhang M, Fu X, Bao X, Yao K. Comparison of fibrin sealant and sutures for conjunctival autograft fixation in pterygium surgery: one-year follow-up. Ophthalmologica 2008; 222: 105-111.
17. Koranyi G, Seregard S, Kopp ED. Cut and paste: a no suture, small incision approach to pterygium surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 392.
18. Karalezli A, Kucukerdonmez C, Akova YA, Altan-Yaycioglu R, Borazan M. Fibrin glue versus sutures for conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery: a prospective comparative study. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92: 1206-1210.
19. Kim HH, Mun HJ, Park YJ, Lee KW, Shin JP. Conjunctivolimbal autograft using a fibrin adhesive in pterygium surgery. Korean J Ophthalmol 2008; 22: 147-154.
20. Srinivasan S, Dollin M, McAllum P, Berger Y, Rootman DS, Slomovic AR. Fibrin glue versus sutures for attaching the conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery: a prospective observer masked clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 215-218.
21. Marticornea J, Rodriguez-Ares MT, Tourino R, Mera P, Valladares MJ, Martinez-de-la-casa JM, et al. Pterygium surgery;conjunctival autograft using a fibrin adhesive. Cornea 2006; 25: 34-36.
22. Uy HS, Reyes JM,Flores JD, Lim-Bon-Siong R. Comparison of fibrin glue and sutures for attaching conjunctival autografts after pterygium excision. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 667-671.
23. Ozdamar Y, Mutevelli S, Han U, Ileri D, Onal B, Ilhan O, et al. A comparative study of tissue glue and vicryl suture for closing limbal-conjunctival autografts and histologic evaluation after pterygium excision. Cornea 2008; 27: 552-558.
24. V, Vannozzi L, Motolese PA. Recurrence Rate Using Fibrin Glue-Assisted Ipsilateral Conjunctival Autograft in Pterygium Surgery: 2-Year Follow-up. Cornea 2010; 5. [Epub ahead of print]
25. Ratnalingam V, Eu AL, Ng GL, Taharin R, John E. Fibrin adhesive is better than sutures in pterygium. Cornea 2010; 29: 485-489.
26. Por YM, Tan DT. Assessment of fibrin glue in pterygium surgery. Cornea 2010; 29: 1-4.
27. Hall RC, Logan AJ, Wells AP. Comparison of fibrin glue with sutures for pterygium excision surgery with conjunctival autografts. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2009; 37: 584-589.
28. Wong DL, Hockenberry-Eaton M, Wilson D, Winkelstein ML, Schwartz P, editors. Wong's Essentials of Pediatric Nursing. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2001. p.1301.
29. Maini R, Collison DJ, Maidment JM, Davies PD, Wormstone IM. Pterygial derived fibroblasts express functionally active histamine and epidermal growth factor receptors. Exp Eye Res 2002; 74: 237-244.
30. Kria L, Ohira A, Amemiya T. Growth factors in cultured pterygium fibroblasts: immunohistochemical and ELISA analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1998; 236: 702-708.