Analysis of digestion time and the crumb rubber percentage in dry-process crumb rubber modified hot bituminous mixes

Construction and Building Materials

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 2323-2334

  Moreno, F ^a   Rubio, M C ^a   Martinez Echevarria, M J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bituminous mixes; Crumb rubber; Dry process

Indexed keywords

BINDER CONTENT; BITUMINOUS MIXES; CONTACT TIME; CRUMB RUBBER; DIGESTION TIME; DRY PROCESS; FURTHER DEVELOPMENT; MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE; MIX DESIGNS; RESEARCH STUDIES; WET PROCESS;

BITUMINOUS MATERIALS; SHOTCRETING;

RUBBER;

EID: 79551613090     PISSN: 09500618     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.029     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Y. Huang, R.N. Bird, and O. Heidrich A review of the use of recycled solid waste materials in asphalt pavements Resour Conserv Recycl 52 2007 58 73 (Pubitemid 47374448)
2. Amirkhanian SN. Utilization of crumb rubber in asphaltic concrete mixtures. South Carolina's experience. Department of Civil Engineering, Clemson University. Report draft; January, 2001.
3. Updyke E, Diaz I. Rubberized asphalt concrete case studies. In: 2008 California pavement preservation conference; April 9 and 10, 2008.
4. S.R. Shatnawi Performance of asphalt rubber mixes in California Int J Pavement Eng 2 1 2001 1 16
5. Tahmoressi M. Evaluation of asphalt rubber pavements in Texas. PaveTex Engineering and Testing, Inc., Report prepared for Rubber Pavements Association; January, 2001.
6. Choubane B, Sholar GA, Musselman JA, Page GC. Long term performance evaluation of asphalt-rubber surface mixes. State of Florida Research Report FL/DOT/SMO/98-431; November, 1998. (Pubitemid 30551705)
7. Santucci L. Rubber roads: waste tires find a home. Pavement technology update, technology transfer program, vol. 1(2); September, 2009.
8. Ruiz A. Mezclas con caucho de neumáticos. Curso de Mezclas Bituminosas: dosificación, fabricación, puesta en obra y control de calidad. Barcelona; March 10, 2010.
9. State of California Department of Transportation. Asphalt rubber usage guide. Materials Engineering and Testing Services; September 30, 2006.
10. Van Kirk JL, Holleran G. Reduced thickness asphalt rubber concrete leads to cost effective pavement performance. In: Proceedings, AR2000, Portugal; November, 2000.
11. Jung J-S, Kaloush KE, Way G. Life cycle cost analysis: conventional versus asphalt rubber pavements. Rubber Pavements Association; August, 2002.
12. Sousa J, Way G, Carlson DD. Cost benefit analysis and energy consumption of scrap tire management options. Rubber Pavements Association; 2001.
13. CEDEX (Centro de Estudios y Experimentación de Obras Públicas). Manual de Empleo de Caucho de NFU en Mezclas Bituminosas. Ministerio de Fomento, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente; May, 2007.
14. López J, Grau JS, Muñoz E. Relación de los Firmes Asfálticos Fabricados con Neumáticos Usados (PNFU) y la Seguridad Vial. Firmes Ecoseguros. IV Jornada Nacional de ASEFMA, Madrid; March 25-26, 2009.
15. García C, Del Cerro J, Hernández MJ, Hidalgo A. Investigación de Mezclas Bituminosas en Caliente fabricadas con PNFU para la reducción del Ruido de Rodadura. II Jornada Nacional de ASEFMA, Madrid; 2008.
16. Sacramento County - Department of Environmental Review and Assessment. Bollard and Brennan: report on status of rubberized asphalt traffic noise reduction in Sacramento county. Sacramento County Public Work Agency; November, 1999.
17. McNerney MT, Landsberger BJ, Turen T, Pandelides A. Comparative field measurements of tire/pavement noise of selected Texas pavements. Research Report No. 7-2957-2. Texas Department of Transportation; April, 2000. (Pubitemid 128622611)
18. McDonald CH. Recollections of early asphalt-rubber history. In: National seminar on asphalt-rubber; October, 1981.
19. Takallou HB. Evaluation of mix ingredients on the performance of rubber modified asphalt mixtures. PhD dissertation, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR; 1987.
20. Takallou HB, Hicks RG. Development of improved mix and construction guidelines for rubber-modified asphalt pavement. Transportation Research Record 1171, Washington DC; 1988.
21. Takallou HB, Sainton A. Advances in technology of asphalt paving materials containing used tire rubber. Transportation Research Record 1339, Washington, DC; 1992.
22. Takallou HB, Hicks RG, Esch DC. Effect of mix ingredients on the behaviour of rubber-modified asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record 1096, TRB, Washington, DC; 1986. p. 68-80.
23. Epps JA. Uses of recycled rubber tires in highways. NCHRP synthesis of highway practice 198, transportation research board, National Research Council, Washington, DC; 1994.
24. Van Kirk J, Holleran G. Reduced thickness asphalt rubber concrete leads to cost effective pavement rehabilitation. In: 1st International conference world of pavements, Sydney, Australia; February 20-24, 2000.
25. Heitzman MA. State of the practice-design and construction of asphalt paving materials with crumb rubber modifier. Publication FHWA-SA-92-022, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC; May, 1992.
26. Esch DC. Construction and benefits of rubber modified asphalt pavements. Transportation Research Board; 1982 [annual meeting].
27. Wiliamsom P, Peploe R. Use of reclaimed tyre rubber in asphalt. Transit New Zealand Technical Memorandum; May, 2006.
28. Shook JF. Experimental construction of rubber-modified asphalt pavements in New York State. New York Department of Transportation Research Report; May, 1990.
29. Lawrence CE, Killackey BJ, Lynch DF. Experimental hot mix pavement with scrap tire rubber at Thamesville, Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Transportation, report 1; November, 1991.
30. Buncher MS. Evaluating the effects of the wet and dry processes for including crumb rubber modifier in hot mix asphalt. Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama; August, 1995.
31. J. Shen, and S. Amirkhanian The influence of crumb rubber modifier (CRM) microstructures on the high temperature properties of CRM binders Int J Pavement Eng 6 4 2005 265 271 (Pubitemid 43024392)
32. J. Shen, S. Amirkhanian, F. Xiao, and B. Tang Influence of surface area and size of crumb rubber on high temperature properties of crumb rubber modified binders Constr Build Mater 23 2009 304 310
33. S.A. Dantas Neto, M.M. Farias, J.C. Pais, P.A.A. Pereira, and J.B. Sousa Influence of characteristics of crumb rubber and digestion time on the properties of asphalt rubber binders Road Mater Pavement Des 10 2005 2 19
34. Singleton TM, Airey GD, Collop AC, Widyatmoko I. Residual bitumen characteristics following dry process rubber bitumen interaction. In: Proceedings of the asphalt rubber 200 conference, Vilamoura, Portugal. p. 463-82.
35. G.D. Airey, M.M. Rahman, and A.C. Collop Absorption of bitumen into crumb rubber using the basket drainage method Int J Pavement Eng 4 2 2003 105 109
36. F. Pérez, R. Miró, A. Martínez, C. Martínez, and A. Páez Evaluación de la cohesión de betunes modificados con polvo de neumáticos Mater Constr 56 284 2006 43 54 (Pubitemid 44955381)
37. Rahman MM, Airey GD, Collop AC. The mechanical properties of the dry process CRM asphalt mixtures following short-term and long-term ageing. Recycled materials in road and airfield pavements. Norway, Workshop; 2005.
38. Rahman MM, Airey GD, Collop AC. Moisture susceptibility of high and low compaction dry process crumb rubber modified asphalt mixtures. TRB; 2010 [annual meeting].
39. F.A. Aisien, F.K. Hymore, and R.O. Ebewele Application of ground scrap tyre rubbers in asphalt concrete pavements Ind J Eng Mater Sci 13 Aug 2006 333 338
40. Dirección General de Carreteras. Pliego de Prescripciones Técnicas Generales para Obras de Carreteras y Puentes PG-3, Ministerio de Fomento, Ediciones Liteam, Madrid; 2010.
41. Dirección General de Carreteras. Normas NLT. Ensayos de Carreteras, Ministerio de Obras Públicas y Transportes (MOPT), 2 Edición, Madrid; 1992.
42. Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación (AENOR): "Manual de normas técnicas UNE-EN". Serie Construcción. Áridos para mezclas bituminosas y tratamientos superficiales de carreteras, Madrid; 2001. p. 526.