Changes in risk factors during adolescence: Implications for risk assessment

Criminal Justice and Behavior

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 248-262

  van der Put, Claudia E ^a   Deković, Maja ^b   Stams, Geert Jan J M ^a   van der Laan, Peter H ^a   Hoeve, Machteld ^a   van Amelsfort, Loura ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

adolescents; age differences; recidivism; risk assessment; risk factors

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551576497     PISSN: 00938548     EISSN: 15523594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093854810391757     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aegisdottir, S., White, M.J., Spengler, P.M., Maugherman, A.S., Anderson, L.A., Cook, R.S.,. . . Cohen, G. (2006). The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 341-382.
2. Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
3. Barnoski, R. (2004). Assessing risk for re-offense: Validating the Washington State Juvenile Court Assessment. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
4. Bishop, M.A., & Trout, J.D. (2002). 50 years of successful predictive modeling should be enough: Lessons for philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science, 69, S197-S208.
5. Breuk, R.E., Clauser, C.A.C., Stams, G.J.J.M., Slot, N.W., & Doreleijers, T.A.H. (2007). The validity of questionnaire self-report of psychopathology and parent-child relationship quality in juvenile delinquents with psychiatric disorders. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 761-771.1.
6. Deković, M., & Asscher, J.J. (2008). Interventies voor jongeren die antisociaal gedrag vertonen: Kenmerken, werkzame mechanismen en moderatoren, van effectiviteit [Interventions for youth who exhibit antisocial behavior: Features, effective mechanisms, and moderators of effectiveness]. Den Haag, Netherlands: Research and Documentation Centre of the Ministry of Justice.
7. Deković, M., & Prinzie, P. (2008). De rol Van het gezin in de ontwikkeling van antisociaal gedrag [The role of the family in the development of antisocial behavior]. In I. Weijers & C. Eliaerts (Eds.), Jeugdcriminologie Achtergronden van Jeugdcriminaliteit [Youth criminology: The context of juvenile delinquency]. (pp. 143-161). Den Haag, Netherlands: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
8. Dolan, M., & Doyle, M. (2000). Violence risk prediction: Clinical and actuarial measures and the role of the Psychopathy Checklist. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 303-311.
9. Doreleijers, T.A.H., Bijl, B., Veldt, M.C., & Van der Loosbroek, E. (1999). BARO: Standaardisatie en protocollering basisonderzoek strafzaken Raad voor de Kinderbescherming [BARO: Standardization and protocols of the investigation of the Council of Child Care and Protection]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: VU University Amsterdam/The Netherlands Institute for Care and Welfare Press.
10. Douglas, K.S., & Skeem, J.L. (2005). Violence risk assessment: Getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 347-383.
11. Farmer, E.M.Z., Compton, S.M., Burns, B.J., & Robertson, E. (2002). Review of the evidence base for treatment of childhood psychotherapy: Externalizing disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 1267-1302.
12. Farrington, D.P. (1986). Age and crime. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice (pp. 29-90). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13. Holmbeck, G.N., Greenley, R.N., & Franks, E.A. (2003). Developmental issues and considerations in research and practice. In A. E. Kazdin & J. R. Weisz (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (pp. 21-41). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14. Howell, J.C. (2003). Diffusing research into practice using the comprehensive strategy for serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1, 219-245.
15. Laub, J.J., & Sampson, R.J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys up to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Loeber, R., DeLamatre, M., Keenan, K., & Zhang, Q. (1998). A prospective replication of developmental pathways in disruptive and delinquent behavior. In R. Cairns, L. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 185-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Loeber, R., Slot, N.W., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2006). A three-dimensional, cumulative developmental model of serious delinquency. In P-O. H. Wikström & R. J. Sampson (Eds.), The explanation of crime: Context, mechanisms and development (pp. 153-194). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18. Loeber, R., Slot, N.W., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2008). A cumulative developmental model of risk and promotive factors. In R. Loeber, H. M. Koot, N. W. Slot, P. H. Van der Laan, & M. Hoeve (Eds.), Tomorrow's criminals: The development of child delinquency and effective interventions (pp. 133-161). Hampshire, England: Ashgate.
19. Moffitt, T.E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.
20. Mossman, D. (1994). Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 62, 783-792.
21. Orbis Partners. (2007). Long-term validation of the Youth Assessment and Screening Instrument (YASI) in New York State juvenile probation. Ottawa, Canada: Author.
22. Prinzie, P., Hoeve, M., & Stams, G.J.J.M. (2008). Family processes, parent and child personality characteristics. In R. Loeber, H. M. Koot, N. W. Slot, P. H. Van der Laan, & M. Hoeve (Eds.), Tomorrow's criminals: The development of child delinquency and effective interventions (pp. 91-102). Hampshire, England: Ashgate.
23. Sampson, R.J., & Laub, J.H. (1992). Crime and deviance in the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 63-84.
24. Sampson, R.J., & Laub, J.H. (1997). A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. In T. P. Thornberry (Ed.), Developmental theories of crime and delinquency: Advances in criminological theory (pp. 133-161). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
25. Schwalbe, C.S. (2007). Risk assessment for juvenile justice: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 449-462.
26. Shapiro, D.E. (1999). The interpretation of diagnostics tests. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8, 113-134.
27. Spaander, M. (2003). Handleiding BARO [Manual BARO]. Utrecht, Netherlands: Raad voor de Kinderbescherming.
28. Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Loeber, R., Wei, E., Farrington, D.P., & Wikström, P-O. H. (2002). Risk and promotive effects in the explanation of persistent serious delinquency in boys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 11-23.
29. Van der Knaap, L.M., & Alberda, D.L. (2009). De predictieve validiteit van de Recidive Inschattingsschalen (RISc) [Predictive validity of the Recidivism Risk Assessment Scales (RISc)]. Den Haag, Netherlands: Boom Juridische Uitgevers/Research and Documentation Centre of the Ministry of Justice.
30. Van der Laan, A.M., & Blom, M. (2006). Jeugddelinquentie: Risico's en bescherming [Juvenile delinquency: Risk and protection]. Den Haag, Netherlands: Boom Juridische Uitgevers/ Research and Documentation Centre of the Ministry of Justice.
31. Van der Put, C.E., & Spanjaard, H. (2009). Handleiding WSJCPA-NL-2009 [Manual WSJCPA-NL-2009]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Universiteit Van Amsterdam /Pedagogical Institute Research.
32. Van der Put, C.E., Stams, G.J.J.M., Van der Laan, P.H., & Oort, F.J. (2009). WSJCPA-NL-2009. De Nederlandse versie van de Washington State Juvenile Court Prescreen Assessment [WSJCPA-NL-2009. The Dutch version of the Washington State Juvenile Court Prescreen Assessment]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
33. Wartna, B.S.J., & Tollenaar. N. (2006). Recidive 1997-2003. Ontwikkelingen in het niveau van de strafrechtelijke recidive van jeugdige en volwassen daders [Recidivism 1997-2003. Developments in the level of the criminal recidivism of juvenile and adult offenders]. Den Haag, Netherlands: Research and Documentation Centre of the Ministry of Justice.
34. Weijers, I. (2008). De adolescent [The adolescent]. In I. Weijers & C. Eliaerts (Eds.), Jeugdcriminologie [Youth criminology] (pp. 71-83). Den Haag, Netherlands: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
35. Weijters, G., Vinke, A., Van der Logt, M., & Gerris, J.R.M. (2004). Gezin, vriendengroep en school als predictoren van delinquent gedrag: Vergelijking tussen jonge en oudere adolescenten [Family, friends, and school as predictors of delinquent behavior: Comparison between young and older adolescents]. In J. R. M. Gerris (Ed.), Jeugdzorg en probleemgedrag: Opvoedingswaarden en vernieuwingen in aanpak [Youth care and problem behavior: Parental values and changes in approach] (pp. 9-22). Assen, Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
36. Welsh, J.L., Schmidt, F., McKinnon, L., Chattha, H.K., & Meyers, J.R. (2008). A comparative study of adolescent risk assessment instruments: Predictive and incremental validity. Assessment, 15, 104-115.
37. Wilcox, D.T., Beech, A.R., Markall, H., & Blacker, J. (2009). Actuarial risk assessment and recidivism in a sample of UK intellectually disabled sexual offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15, 97-106.