Criteria for vaccine introduction: Results of a DELPHI discussion among international immunisation experts on a stepwise decision-making procedure

Journal of Public Health

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 73-80

  Piso, Brigitte ^a   Zechmeister, Ingrid ^a   Geiger Gritsch, Sabine ^a,b  

^a LUDWIG BOLTZMANN INSTITUTE FOR LUNG VASCULAR RESEARCH   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY FOR HEALTH SCIENCES   (Austria)

Author keywords

Immunisation; Preventive health services; Vaccination

Indexed keywords

VACCINE;

ARTICLE; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; IMMUNIZATION; QUESTIONNAIRE;

EID: 79551574150     PISSN: 09431853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10389-010-0361-7     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (2008) Guidelines for preparing submissions to the pharmaceutical benefits advisory committee (version 4.3). Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/ pbacguidelines-index. Cited 4 June 2010
2. C Castillo-Solórzano J Andrus 2004 El desarrollo de nuevas vacunas: generación de información para la toma de decisions Rev Panam Salud Públ 15 1 1 3
3. LJ Erickson P De Wals L Farand 2005 An analytical framework for immunization programs in Canada Vaccine 23 19 2470 2476 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2M7mtlygtA%3D%3D 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.10.029 15752833 (Pubitemid 40332518)
4. B George A Harris A Mitchell 2001 Cost-effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision-making: evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in Australia (1991 to 1996) Pharmacoeconomics 19 11 1103 1109 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3Mnpt1yitQ%3D%3D 10.2165/00019053-200119110-00004 11735677
5. González Alonso J, Pachón del Amo I, Anchuela OT, Heras CA, Peña-Rey Lorenzo I, García FS, et al (2004) Criterios para fundamentar la modificación de los programas de vacunas. Ministerio de sanidad y consumo- Subdirección general de promoción de la salud y epidemiología. http://www.msc.es/ciudadanos/proteccionSalud/ vacunaciones/docs/criteriosVacunas.pdf. Cited 4 June 2010
6. H Houweling M Verweij EJ Ruitenberg 2010 Criteria for inclusion of vaccinations in public programmes Vaccine 28 17 2924 2931 10.1016/j.vaccine. 2010.02.021 20189486
7. Hutt HJ (2008) How do we tackle the complex field of vaccinology in the twenty-first century? J Public Health 16(4): 245-246
8. TG Kimman HJ Boot GAM Berbers PE Vermeer-de Bondt G Ardine de Wit HE de Melker 2006 Developing a vaccination evaluation model to support evidence-based decision-making on national immunization programs Vaccine 24 22 4769 4778 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.03.022 16616803 (Pubitemid 43776793)
9. Lopalco PL (2010) Improving vaccination programmes in the European Union. J Public Health 16(4): 281-285
10. Mansoor O, Shin S, Maher C, and the Immunization Focus of WPRO (2000) Assessing new vaccines for national immunization programmes: a framework to assist decision makers. World Health Organization Western Pacific Regional Office. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2000/9290611545.pdf. Cited 4 June 2010
11. B Piso C Wild 2009 Decision support in vaccination policies Vaccine 27 43 5923 5928 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MnkvFGmsQ%3D%3D 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.07.105 19698809
12. Stratton K, Durch J, Lawrence S, Editors Committee to Study Priorities for Vaccine Development Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Institute of Medicine (2000) Vaccines for the 21st century: a tool for decisionmaking. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
13. World Health Organization (2005) Expanded programme on immunization of the department of immunization, vaccines and biologicals. Introduction guideline- adding a vaccine to a national immunization programme: decision and implementation. WHO. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2005/WHO-IVB-05.18.pdf. Cited 4 June 2010