Three-dimensional tissue scaffolds from interbonded poly(ε- caprolactone) fibrous matrices with controlled porosity

Tissue Engineering - Part C: Methods

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 209-218

  Tang, Yanwei ^a   Wong, Cynthia ^a   Wang, Hongxia ^a   Sutti, Alessandra ^a   Kirkland, Mark ^b   Wang, Xungai ^a   Lin, Tong ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b Cytomatrix Pty Ltd   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; FIBROBLASTS; LEACHING; PORE SIZE; SCAFFOLDS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SYNTHETIC FIBERS; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TISSUE; TISSUE CULTURE; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

CAPROLACTONE; CELL LINES; CELL NUMBER; CHINESE HAMSTER OVARY; CHINESE HAMSTER OVARY CELLS; CONTROLLED POROSITY; FIBER ARCHITECTURE; FIBER SURFACE; FIBROUS MATRIX; MATRIX; MATRIX POROSITY; MICROCOMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PORE ARCHITECTURE; PORE INTERCONNECTIVITY; RAT SKIN; SURFACE AREA; THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D); TISSUE CULTURE PLATES; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

CELL CULTURE;

CRICETULUS GRISEUS; RATTUS;

POLYCAPROLACTONE; POLYESTER; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL COUNT; CHEMISTRY; CHO CELL; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CRICETULUS; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECT; FIBROBLAST; HAMSTER; POROSITY; RAT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ANIMALS; CELL COUNT; CHO CELLS; CRICETINAE; CRICETULUS; FIBROBLASTS; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POLYESTERS; POROSITY; RATS; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 79551573470     PISSN: 19373384     EISSN: 19373392     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tec.2010.0223     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Nam, Y.S., and Park, T.G. Biodegradable polymeric micro-cellular foams by modified thermally induced phase separation method. Biomaterials 20, 1783, 1999.
2. Zhang, S. Fabrication of novel biomaterials via molecular self-assembly. Nat Biotechnol 21, 1171, 2003.
3. Mikos, A.G., et al. Preparation and characterization of poly(l-lactic acid) foams. Polymer 35, 1068, 1994.
4. Mooney, D.J., et al. Novel approach to fabricate porous sponges of poly(-lactic-co-glycolic acid) without the use of organic solvents. Biomaterials 17, 1417, 1996.
5. Park, A., Ben, W., and Griffith, L.G. Integration of surface modification and 3D fabrication techniques to prepare patterned poly(L-lactide) substrates allowing regionally selective cell adhesion. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 9, 89, 1998.
6. Hutmacher, D.W., et al. Mechanical properties and cell cultural response of polycaprolactone scaffolds designed and fabricated via fused deposition modeling. J Biomed Mater Res 55, 203, 2001.
7. Freed, L.E., et al. Biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol 12, 689, 1994.
8. Moutos, F.T., Freed, L.E., and Guilak, F. A biomimetic three-dimensional woven composite scaffold for functional tissue engineering of cartilage. Nat Mater 6, 162, 2007.
9. Boublik, J., et al. Mechanical properties and remodeling of hybrid cardiac constructs made from heart cells, fibrin, and biodegradable, elastomeric knitted fabric. Tissue Eng 11, 1122, 2005.
10. Li, Y., et al. Thermal compression and characterization of three-dimensional nonwoven PET matrices as tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials 22, 609, 2001.
11. Seunarine, K., et al. 3D polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Nanomedicine 1, 281, 2006.
12. Liu, C., Xia, Z., and Czernuszka, J.T. Design and development of three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering. Chem Eng Res Des 85(7A), 1051, 2007.
13. Van Tienen, T.G., et al. Tissue ingrowth and degradation of two biodegradable porous polymers with different porosities and pore sizes. Biomaterials 23, 1731, 2002.
14. Otsuki, B., et al. Pore throat size and connectivity determine bone and tissue ingrowth into porous implants: three-dimensional micro-CT based structural analyses of porous bioactive titanium implants. Biomaterials 27, 5892, 2006.
15. Akay, G., Birch, M.A., and Bokhari, M.A. Microcellular polyHIPE polymer supports osteoblast growth and bone formation in vitro. Biomaterials 25, 3991, 2004.
16. Ahu Akin, F., et al. Preparation and analysis of macroporous TiO2 films on Ti surfaces for bone-tissue implants. J Biomed Mater Res 57, 588, 2001.
17. Tsuruga, E., et al. Pore size of porous hydroxyapatite as the cell-substratum controls BMP-induced osteogenesis. J Biochem 121, 317, 1997.
18. Kuboki, Y., Jin, Q., and Takita, H. Geometry of carriers controlling phenotypic expression in BMP-induced osteo-genesis and chondrogenesis. J Bone Joint Surg Ser A 83A Suppl 1 (Pt 2), S105, 2001.
19. Wake, M.C., Patrick, C.W., Jr., and Mikos, A.G. Pore morphology effects on the fibrovascular tissue growth in porous polymer substrates. Cell Transplant 3, 339, 1994.
20. Yannas, I.V. Biologically active analogues of the extracellular matrix: artificial skin and nerves. Angewandte Chemie Int Ed Engl 29, 20, 1990.
21. Yannas, I.V. Applications of ECM analogs in surgery. J Cell Biochem 56, 188, 1994.
22. Zeltinger, J., et al. Effect of pore size and void fraction on cellular adhesion, proliferation, and matrix deposition. Tissue Eng 7, 557, 2001.
23. Cooper, J.A., et al. Fiber-based tissue-engineered scaffold for ligament replacement: Design considerations and in vitro evaluation. Biomaterials 26, 1523, 2005.
24. Lu, H.H., et al. Anterior cruciate ligament regeneration using braided biodegradable scaffolds: in vitro optimization studies. Biomaterials 26, 4805, 2005.
25. Ma, T., et al. Tissue engineering human placenta trophoblast cells in 3-D fibrous matrix: spatial effects on cell proliferation and function. Biotechnol Prog 15, 715, 1999.
26. Li, Y., et al. Effects of filtration seeding on cell density, spatial distribution, and proliferation in nonwoven fibrous matrices. Biotechnol Prog 17, 935, 2001.
27. Dvir-Ginzberg, M., et al. Liver tissue engineering within alginate scaffolds: effects of cell-seeding density on hepa-tocyte viability, morphology, and function. Tissue Eng 9, 757, 2003.
28. Cory, A.H., et al. Use of an aqueous soluble tetrazolium/ formazan assay for cell growth assays in culture. Cancer Commun 3, 207, 1991.
29. Ghosh, S., and Chapman, L. Effects of fiber blends and needling parameters on needlepunched moldable nonwoven fabric. J Text Inst 93, 75, 2002.
30. Barbosa, M.A., et al. Polysaccharides as scaffolds for bone regeneration. ITBM-RBM 26, 212, 2005.
31. Ho, S.T., and Hutmacher, D.W. A comparison of micro CT with other techniques used in the characterization of scaffolds. Biomaterials 27, 1362, 2006.
32. Dorsey, S.M., Lin-Gibson, S., and Simon, C.G. Jr. X-ray microcomputed tomography for the measurement of cell adhesionand proliferation in polymer scaffolds. Biomaterials 30, 2967, 2009.
33. Li, J., and Mak, A.F.T. Hydraulic permeability of poly-glycolic acid scaffolds as a function of biomaterial degradation. J Biomater Appl 19, 253, 2005.
34. Porter, K., Prescott, D., and Frye, J. Changes in surface morphology of Chinese hamster ovary cells during the cell cycle. J Cell Biol 57, 815, 1973.
35. Rubin, R.W., and Everhart, L.P. The effect of cell to cell contact on the surface morphology of Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Cell Biol 57, 837, 1973.
36. Singhvi, R., Stephanopoulos, G., and Wang, D.I.C. Review: effects of substratum morphology on cell physiology. Biotechnol Bioeng 43, 764, 1994.
37. Curtis, A., and Wilkinson, C. Topographical control of cells. Biomaterials 18, 1573, 1997.
38. Walboomers, X.F., and Jansen, J.A. Cell and tissue behavior on micro-grooved surfaces. Odontology 89, 0002, 2001.
39. Boyan, B.D., et al. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials 17, 137, 1996.
40. Kunzler, T.P., et al. Systematic study of osteoblast and fibro-blast response to roughness by means of surface-morphology gradients. Biomaterials 28, 2175, 2007.