Seeing the forest for the trees: Statistical phylogeography in a changing world

New Phytologist

Volumn 189, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 894-897

  Eckert, Andrew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Conservation biology; Douglas fir; Forest trees; Global climate change; Phylogeography

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; GENETICS; GENOMICS; NOTE; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREE;

ECOSYSTEM; GENOMICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TREES;

PSEUDOTSUGA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII;

EID: 79551569167     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03631.x     Document Type: Note

References (15)

1. Aitken SN, Yeaman S, Holliday JA, Wang T, Curtis-McLane S. 2008. Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations. Evolutionary Applications 1: 95-111.
2. Avise JC, Arnold J, Ball RM, Bermingham E, Lamb T, Neigel JE, Reeb CA, Saunders NC. 1987. Intraspecific phylogeography: the mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 489-522.
3. Bonin A, Nicole F, Pompanon F, Miaud C, Taberlet P. 2007. Population adaptive index: a new method to help measure intraspecific genetic diversity and prioritize populations for conservation. Conservation Biology 21: 697-708.
4. Eckert AJ, Wegrzyn JL, Pande B, Jermstad KD, Lee JM, Liechty JD, Tearse BR, Krutovsky KV, Neale DB. 2009. Multilocus patterns of nucleotide diversity and divergence reveal positive selection at candidate genes related to cold-hardiness in coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii). Genetics 183: 289-298.
5. Edwards SV, Beerli P. 2000. Perspective: gene divergence, population divergence, and the variance in coalescence time in phylogeographic studies. Evolution 54: 1839-1854.
6. Elith J, Leathwick JR. 2009. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40: 677-697.
7. Gugger PF, González-Rodríguez A, Rodríguez-Correa H, Sugita S, Cavender-Bares J. 2010. Southward Pleistocene migration of Douglas-fir into Mexico: phylogeography, ecological niche modeling, and conservation of 'rear edge' populations. New Phytologist 189: 1185-1199.
8. Hey J, Nielsen R. 2007. Integration within the Felsenstein equation for improved Markov chain Monte Carlo methods in population genetics. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA 104: 2785-2790.
9. Hickerson MJ, Carstens BC, Cavendar-Bares J, Crandall KA, Graham CH, Johnson JB, Rissler L, Victoriano PF, Yoder AD. 2010. Phylogeography's past, present and future: 10years after Avise, 2000. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 54: 291-301.
10. Hijmans RJ, Graham CH. 2006. The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions. Global Change Biology 12: 2272-2281.
11. Knowles LL, Maddison WP. 2002. Statistical phylogeography. Molecular Ecology 11: 2623-2635.
12. Richards CL, Carstens BC, Knowles LL. 2007. Distribution modelling and statistical phylogeography: an integrative framework for generating and testing alternative biogeographical hypotheses. Journal of Biogeography 35: 1833-1845.
13. Savolainen O, Pyhäjärvi T, Knürr T. 2007. Gene flow and local adaptation in trees. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 38: 595-619.
14. Siol M, Wright SI, Barrett SCH. 2010. The population genomics of plant adaptation. New Phytologist 188: 313-332.
15. Wang T, O'Neill GA, Aitken SN. 2010. Integrating environmental and genetic effects to predict responses of tree populations to climate. Ecological Applications 20: 153-163.