Measuring bone erosion and edema in rheumatoid arthritis: A comparison of manual segmentation and RAMRIS methods

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 364-371

  Crowley, Angela R ^a   Dong, Jing ^b   McHaffie, Alex ^c   Clarke, Andrew W ^d   Reeves, Quentin ^c   Williams, Megan ^a   Robinson, Elizabeth ^b   Dalbeth, Nicola ^a   McQueen, Fiona M ^a,b  

^a GREEN LANE HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^c AUCKLAND CITY HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^d NORTH SHORE HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

magnetic resonance imaging; RAMRIS; rheumatoid arthritis; segmentation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE EDEMA; BONE EROSION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED MANUAL SEGMENTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EDEMA; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAMRIS SCORE; RELIABILITY; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDITY; WRIST;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; EDEMA; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOLYSIS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PILOT PROJECTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WRIST JOINT;

EID: 79551563318     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22425     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Peterfy CG,. New developments in imaging in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2003; 15: 288-295.
2. Dalbeth N, Smith T, Gray S, et al. Cellular characterisation of magnetic resonance imaging bone oedema in rheumatoid arthritis; implications for pathogenesis of erosive disease. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 279-282.
3. McQueen FM, Benton N, Perry D, et al. Bone edema scored on magnetic resonance imaging scans of the dominant carpus at presentation predicts radiographic joint damage of the hands and feet six years later in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 1814-1827.
4. Hetland ML, Ejbjerg B, Horslev-Petersen K, et al. MRI bone oedema is the strongest predictor of subsequent radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis. Results from a 2-year randomised controlled trial (CIMESTRA). Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 384-390.
5. Benton N, Stewart N, Crabbe J, Robinson E, Yeoman S, McQueen FM,. MRI of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis can be used to predict functional outcome at 6 years. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 555-561.
6. Moller Dohn U, Boonen A, Hetland ML, et al. Erosive progression is minimal, but erosion healing rare, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab. A 1 year investigator-initiated follow-up study using high-resolution computed tomography as the primary outcome measure. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 1585-1590.
7. Ostergaard M, Peterfy C, Conaghan P, et al. OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging studies. Core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA-MRI scoring system. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 1385-1386.
8. Bird P, Ejbjerg B, McQueen F, Ostergaard M, Lassere M, Edmonds J,. OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging studies. Exercise 5: an international multicenter reliability study using computerized MRI erosion volume measurements. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 1380-1384.
9. Conaghan P, Lassere M, Ostergaard M, et al. OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging studies. Exercise 4: an international multicenter longitudinal study using the RA-MRI Score. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 1376-1379.
10. Haavardsholm EA, Ostergaard M, Ejbjerg BJ, et al. Reliability and sensitivity to change of the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score in a multireader, longitudinal setting. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 52: 3860-3867.
11. Bruhn H, Gyngell ML, Hanicke W, Merboldt KD, Frahm J,. High-resolution fast low-angle shot magnetic resonance imaging of the normal hand. Skeletal Radiol 1991; 20: 259-265.
12. Wieners G, Detert J, Streitparth F, et al. High-resolution MRI of the wrist and finger joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 2176-2182.
13. Bird P, Lassere M, Shnier R, Edmonds J,. Computerized measurement of magnetic resonance imaging erosion volumes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with existing magnetic resonance imaging scoring systems and standard clinical outcome measures. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 614-624.
14. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988; 31: 315-324.
15. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL,. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420-428.
16. Ostergaard M, Stoltenberg M, Lovgreen-Nielsen P, Volck B, Jensen CH, Lorenzen I,. Magnetic resonance imaging-determined synovial membrane and joint effusion volumes in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: comparison with the macroscopic and microscopic appearance of the synovium. Arthritis Rheum 1997; 40: 1856-1867.
17. Hodgson R, Grainger A, O'Connor P, Barnes T, Connolly S, Moots R,. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of bone marrow oedema in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 270-272.
18. Hodgson RJ, O'Connor P, Moots R,. MRI of rheumatoid arthritis image quantitation for the assessment of disease activity, progression and response to therapy. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008; 47: 13-21.
19. Mayerhoefer ME, Breitenseher MJ, Kramer J, Aigner N, Norden C, Hofmann S,. STIR vs. T1-weighted fat-suppressed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of bone marrow edema of the knee: computer-assisted quantitative comparison and influence of injected contrast media volume and acquisition parameters. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 22: 788-793.
20. Marzo-Ortega H, McGonagle D, Rhodes LA, et al. Efficacy of infliximab on MRI-determined bone oedema in psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2007; 66: 778-781.
21. McQueen F, Ostergaard M, Peterfy C, et al. Pitfalls in scoring MR images of rheumatoid arthritis wrist and metacarpophalangeal joints. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64 (Suppl 1): i48-55.
22. Bird P, Joshua F, Lassere M, Shnier R, Edmonds J,. Training and calibration improve inter-reader reliability of joint damage assessment using magnetic resonance image scoring and computerized erosion volume measurement. J Rheumatol 2005; 32: 1452-1458.
23. Emond PD, Choi A, O'Neill J, Xie J, Adachi R, Gordon CL,. The development of EERA: software for assessing rheumatic joint erosions. Can Assoc Radiol J 2009; 60: 63-68.