A numerical study of compressible turbulent boundary layers

Physics of Fluids

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Lagha, M ^a   Kim, J ^a   Eldredge, J D ^a   Zhong, X ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; ATMOSPHERIC THERMODYNAMICS; BOUNDARY LAYER FLOW; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; MACH NUMBER; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; TURBULENCE; TURBULENT FLOW;

COMPRESSIBLE BOUNDARY LAYERS; FREE STREAM MACH NUMBERS; NEAR WALL TURBULENCE STRUCTURES; NEAR-WALL TURBULENCE; RECYCLING METHODS; TURBULENCE STATISTICS; TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYERS; ZERO PRESSURE GRADIENT;

BOUNDARY LAYERS;

EID: 79551562616     PISSN: 10706631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.3541841     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Smits A.J. Dussauge J.P. Turbulent Shear Layers in Supersonic Flow 1996, and (AIP, New York, ).
2. Maeder T. Adams N.A. Kleiser L. Direct simulation of turbulent supersonic boundary layers by an extended temporal approach. J. Fluid Mech. 2001, 429:187. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112000002718.
3. Guarini S.E. Moser R.D. Shariff K. Wray A. Direct numerical simulation of a supersonic boundary layer at Mach 2.5. J. Fluid Mech. 2000, 414:1. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112000008466.
4. Martin M.P. DNS of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. 2004, AIAA Paper No. 2004-2337.
5. Pirozzoli S. Grasso F. Gatski T.B. Direct numerical simulation and analysis of a spatially evolving supersonic turbulent boundary layer at M=2.25. Phys. Fluids 2004, 16:530. PHFLE6, 1070-6631, 10.1063/1.1637604.
6. Lagha M. Zhong X. Eldredge J. Kim J. A hybrid WENO scheme for the simulation of shock wave-boundary layer interaction. 2009, and AIAA Paper No. 2009-1136.
7. Shu C.-W. Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 1989, 83:32. JCTPAH, 0021-9991, 10.1016/0021-9991(89)90222-2.
8. Ren Y.X. Liu M. Zhang H. A characteristic-wise hybrid compact-WENO scheme for solving hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 2003, 192:365. JCTPAH, 0021-9991, 10.1016/j.jcp.2003.07.006.
9. Lund T. Wu X. Squires K. Generation of turbulent inflow data for spatially developing boundary layer. J. Comput. Phys. 1998, 140:233. JCTPAH, 0021-9991, 10.1006/jcph.1998.5882.
10. Urbin G. Knight D. Large-eddy simulation of a supersonic boundary layer using an unstructured grid. AIAA J. 2001, 39:1288. AIAJAH, 0001-1452, 10.2514/2.1471.
11. Stolz S. Adams N.A. Large-eddy simulation of high-Reynolds-number supersonic boundary layers using the approximate deconvolution model and a rescaling and recycling technique. Phys. Fluids 2003, 15:2398. PHFLE6, 1070-6631, 10.1063/1.1588637.
12. Sagaut P. Garnier E. Tromeur E. Larcheveque L. Labourasse E. Turbulent inflow conditions for large-eddy simulation of compressible wall-bounded flows. AIAA J. 2004, 42:469. AIAJAH, 0001-1452, 10.2514/1.3461.
13. Ferrante A. Elghobashi S.E. A robust method for generating inflow conditions for direct simulations of spatially-developing turbulent boundary layers. J. Comput. Phys. 2004, 198:372. JCTPAH, 0021-9991, 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.01.016.
14. Xu S. Martin P.M. Assessment of inflow boundary conditions for compressible turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 2004, 16:2623. PHFLE6, 1070-6631, 10.1063/1.1758218.
15. Pirozzoli S. Bernardini M. Grasso F. Characterization of coherent vortical structures in a supersonic turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 2008, 613:205. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112008003005.
16. Gatski T.B. Erlebacher G. Numerical simulation of a spatially evolving supersonic turbulent boundary layer. 2002, and NASA/TM Report No. 211934.
17. Coleman G.N. Kim J. Moser R.D. A numerical study of turbulent supersonic isothermal-wall channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 1995, 305:159. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112095004587.
18. Huang P.G. Coleman G.N. Bradshaw P. Compressible turbulent channel flow: DNS results and modeling. J. Fluid Mech. 1995, 305:185. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112095004599.
19. Kim P. 2010, (private communication, ).
20. Kim J. Moin P. Moser R.D. Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 1987, 177:133. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112087000892.
21. Spina E.F. Smits A.J. Robinson S.K. The physics of supersonic turbulent boundary layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1994, 26:287. ARVFA3, 0066-4189, 10.1146/annurev.fl.26.010194.001443.
22. Samtaney R. Pullin D.I. Kosovic B. Direct numerical simulation of decaying compressible turbulence and shocklet statistics. Phys. Fluids 2001, 13:1415. PHFLE6, 1070-6631, 10.1063/1.1355682.
23. Pirozzoli S. Grasso F. Direct numerical simulations of isotropic compressible turbulence: Influence of compressibility on dynamics and structures. Phys. Fluids 2004, 16:4386. PHFLE6, 1070-6631, 10.1063/1.1804553.
24. Duan L. Beekman I. Martin M.P. Direct numerical simulation of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. Part 2. Effect of wall temperature. J. Fluid Mech. 2010, 655:419. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112010000959.
25. Bradshaw P. Compressible turbulent shear layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1977, 9:33. ARVFA3, 0066-4189, 10.1146/annurev.fl.09.010177.000341.
26. Kim J. Lim J. A linear process in wall-bounded turbulent shear flows. Phys. Fluids 2000, 12:1885. PHFLE6, 1070-6631, 10.1063/1.870437.
27. Hamilton J.M. Kim J. Waleffe F. Regeneration mechanisms of near-wall turbulence structures. J. Fluid Mech. 1995, 287:317. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112095000978.
28. Schoppa W. Hussain F. Coherent structure generation in near-wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 2002, 453:57. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S002211200100667X.