Role of perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in cervical lymphadenopathy

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 21-25

  Razek, Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel ^a   Gaballa, Gada ^a  

^a MANSOURA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

lymph node; MR imaging; Perfusion

Indexed keywords

BODY FLUIDS; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY;

BODY WEIGHT; CERVICAL LYMPH NODES; CONTRAST-ENHANCED; DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST; GADOLINIA; LYMPH NODE; LYMPHADENOPATHY; PERFUSION; TIME SIGNALS;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CERVICAL LYMPH NODE; CERVICAL LYMPHADENOPATHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; LYMPHOMA; MALE; METASTASIS; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

EID: 79551535904     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181ff9143     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Mack M, Rieger J, Baghi M, et al. Cervical lymph nodes. Eur J Radiol. 2008;66:493-500.
2. Nakamura T, Sumi M. Nodal imaging in the neck: recent advances in US, CT and MR imaging of metastatic nodes. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1235-1241.
3. Gor D, Langer J, Loevner LA. Imaging of cervical lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: the basics. Radiol Clin North Am. 2006;44:101-110.
4. Ahuja A, Ying M. Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymph nodes. Pictorial essay. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184:1691-1699.
5. Alam F, Naito K, Horiguchi J, et al. Accuracy of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: comparison with conventional B-mode sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:604-610.
6. Kawai Y, Sumi M, Nakamura T. Turbo short-inversion recovery imaging for metastatic node screening in patients with head and neck cancer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1283-1287.
7. Abdel Razek A, Soliman N, Elkhammary S, et al. Role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cervical lymphadenopathy. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:1468-1477.
8. Fishbein NJ, Noworolski SM, Henry RG, et al. Assessment of metastatic cervical adenopathy using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:301-311.
9. King AD, Yeung DK, Ahuja AT, et al. In vivo proton MR spectroscopy of primary and nodal nasopharyngeal carcinoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:484-490.
10. Bisdas S, Baghi M, Smolarz A, et al. Quantitative measurements of perfusion and permeability of oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer, recurrent disease, and associated lymph nodes using 1st-pass contrast-enhanced computed tomography studies. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:172-179.
11. Yoon D, Hwang H, Chang S, et al. CT, MR, US, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and their combined use for the assessment of cervical lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:634-642.
12. Sohn Y, Kwak J, Kim E, et al. Diagnostic approach for evaluation of lymph node metastasis from thyroid cancer using ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:38-43.
13. Chavhan G, Babyn PS, Thomas B, et al. Principles, techniques, and applications of T2*-based MR imaging and its special applications. RadioGraphics. 2009;29:1433-1449.
14. Kvistad K, Rydland J, Vainio J, et al. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first pass perfusion MR imaging. Radiology. 2000;216:545-553.
15. Wong JC, Provenzale JM, Petrella JR. Perfusion MR imaging of brain neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1147-1157.
16. Cha S, Knopp E, Johnson G, et al. Intracranial mass lesions: dynamic contrast-enhanced susceptibility-weighted echo-planar perfusion MR imaging. Radiology. 2002;223:11-29.
17. Paulson E, Schmainda K. Comparison of dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced RM methods: recommendations for measuring relative cerebral blood volume in brain tumors. Radiology. 2008;249:601-613.
18. Law M, Young R, Babb J, et al. Gliomas: predicting time to progression or survival with cerebral blood volume measurements at dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. Radiology. 2008;247:490-499.
19. Liao W, Liu Y, Wang X, et al. Differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphoma and high-grade glioma with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol. 2009;50:217-225.
20. Wu R, Bruening R, Ducreux D, et al. Estimation of relative blood volume in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. J Neuroradiol. 2004;31:190-197.
21. Abdel Razek A, Elsorogy L, Soliman N, et al. Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging in distinguishing benign from malignant head and neck tumors: a pilot study. Eur J Radiol. 2009; doi:10.1016/j.ejrad. 2009.07.022.
22. Turkbey B, Kobayashi H, Ogawa M, et al. Imaging of tumor angiogenesis: functional or targeted? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193:304-313.
23. Barrett T, Brechbiel M, Bernardo M, et al. MRI of tumor angiogenesis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:235-249.
24. Provenzale J. Imaging of angiogenesis: clinical techniques and novel imaging methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:11-23.
25. Kvistad K, Lundgren S, Fjosne H, et al. Differentiation benign and malignant breast lesions with T2*-weighted first pass perfusion imaging. Acta Radiol. 1999;40:45-51.
26. Asaumi J, Yanagi Y, Konouchi H, et al. Application of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to differentiate malignant lymphoma from squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck. Oral Oncol. 2004;40:579-584.
27. King AD, Ahuja AT, Yeung DK, et al. Malignant cervical lymphadenopathy: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology. 2007;245:806-813.
28. Sumi M, Nakamura T. Diagnostic importance of focal defects in the apparent diffusion coefficient-based differentiation between lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma nodes in the neck. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:975-981.
29. Tan T, Pang P, Goh H, et al. Castleman's disease of the neck: a description of four cases on contrast-enhanced CT. Br J Radiol. 2004;77:253-256.