Long-term effects of prescribed fire on mixed conifer forest structure in the Sierra Nevada, California

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 261, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 989-994

  van Mantgem, Phillip J ^a   Stephenson, Nathan L ^a   Knapp, Eric ^b   Battles, John ^c   Keeley, Jon E ^a  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Fire ecology; Forest restoration; Fuel reduction treatment; Spatial pattern; Tree mortality

Indexed keywords

FIRE ECOLOGY; FOREST RESTORATION; FUEL REDUCTION TREATMENT; SPATIAL PATTERNS; TREE MORTALITY;

CONSERVATION; ECOLOGY; FORESTRY; PARKS; RESTORATION;

FIRES;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; BIOMASS; CONIFEROUS FOREST; DIAMETER; HABITAT RESTORATION; MAGNITUDE; MIXED FOREST; MORTALITY; NONLINEARITY; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; POPULATION DECLINE; POPULATION DENSITY; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL; WILDFIRE;

BIODIVERSITY; CALIFORNIA; CONSERVATION; ECOLOGY; FOREST FIRES; FORESTRY; PRESCRIBED BURNING; RESTORATION; SOFTWOODS;

CALIFORNIA; SEQUOIA NATIONAL PARK; SIERRA NEVADA [CALIFORNIA]; UNITED STATES;

CONIFEROPHYTA;

EID: 79551531009     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Agee J.K., Skinner C.N. Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. Forest Ecology and Management 2005, 211:83-96.
2. Allen C.D., Savage M., Falk D.A., Suckling K.F., Swetnam T.W., Schulke T., Stacey P.B., Morgan P., Hoffman M., Klingel J.T. Ecological restoration of Southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems: a broad perspective. Ecological Applications 2002, 12:1418-1433.
3. Baddeley A. Analysing Spatial Point Patterns in R, Version 3 2008, CSIRO, (accessed December 13, 2009). http://www.csiro.au/files/files/pn0y.pdf.
4. Biging G.S., Dobbertin M. A comparison of distance-dependent competition measures for height and basal area growth of individual conifer trees. Forest Science 1992, 38:695-720.
5. Brown R.T., Agee J.K., Franklin J.F. Forest restoration and fire: principles in the context of place. Conservation Biology 2004, 18:903-912.
6. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference 2002, Springer-Verlag, New York.
7. Cohen W.B., Harmon M.E., Wallin D.O., Fiorella M. Two decades of carbon flux from forests of the Pacific Northwest. Bioscience 1996, 46:838-844.
8. Das A., Battles J.J., van Mantgem P., Stephenson N. Spatial elements of mortality risk in old-growth forests. Ecology 2008, 89:1744-1756.
9. Dore S., Kolb T.E., Montes-Helu M., Eckert S.E., Sullivan B.W., Hungate B.A., Kaye J.P., Hart S.C., Koch G.W., Finkral A. Carbon and water fluxes from ponderosa pine forests disturbed by wildfire and thinning. Ecological Applications 2010, 20:663-683.
10. Fulé P.Z., Cocke A.E., Heinlein T.A., Covington W.W. Effects of an intense prescribed forest fire: is it ecological restoration?. Restoration Ecology 2004, 12:220-230.
11. Hickman J.C. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California 1993, University of California Press, Berkeley.
12. Hood S., Bentz B. Predicting postfire Douglas-fir beetle attacks and tree mortality in the northern Rocky Mountains. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2007, 37:1058-1069.
13. Hood, S.M., 2010. Mitigating old tree mortality in long-unburned, fire-dependent forests: a synthesis. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-238, Fort Collins, CO.
14. Hurteau M., Koch G., Hungate B. Carbon protection and fire risk reduction: toward a full accounting of forest carbon offsets. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2008, 6:493-498.
15. Hurteau M., North M. Fuel treatment effects on tree-based forest carbon storage and emissions under modeled wildfire scenarios. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2009, 7:409-414.
16. Hurteau M.D., North M. Carbon recovery rates following different wildfire risk mitigation treatments. Forest Ecology and Management 2010, 260:930-937.
17. Kashian D.M., Romme W.H., Tinker D.B., Turner M.G., Ryan K.C. Carbon storage on landscapes with stand replacing fires. Bioscience 2006, 56:598-606.
18. Kilgore B.M. Impact of prescribed burning on a sequoia-mixed conifer forest. Proceedings of the Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference, vol. 12 1973, 345-375.
19. Knapp E.E., Keeley J.E. Heterogeneity in fire severity within early season and late season prescribed burns in a mixed-conifer forest. International Journal of Wildland Fire 2006, 15:37-45.
20. Knapp E.E., Keeley J.E., Ballenger E.A., Brennan T.J. Fuel reduction and coarse woody debris dynamics with early season and late season prescribed fire in a Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management 2005, 208:383-397.
21. Knapp E.E., Schwilk D.W., Kane J.M., Keeley J.E. Role of burning on initial understory vegetation response to prescribed fire in a mixed conifer forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2007, 37:11-22.
22. Loosmore N., Ford E. Statistical inference using the G or K point pattern spatial statistics. Ecology 2006, 87:1925-1931.
23. Means, J.E., Hansen, H.A., Koerper, G.J., Alaback, P.B., Klopsch, M.W., 1994. Software for computing plant biomass-BIOPAK users guide. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-340, Portland, OR.
24. Menning K.M., Battles J.J., Benning T.L. Quantifying change in distributions: a new departure index that detects, measures and describes change in distributions from population structures, size-classes and other ordered data. Oecologia 2007, 154:75-84.
25. Millar C.I., Stephenson N.L., Stephens S.L. Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecological Applications 2007, 17:2145-2151.
26. Mutch L.S., Parsons D.J. Mixed conifer forest mortality and establishment before and after prescribed fire in Sequoia National Park, California. Forest Science 1998, 44:341-355.
27. North M., Hurteau M., Innes J. Fire suppression and fuels treatment effects on mixed-conifer carbon stocks and emissions. Ecological Applications 2009, 19:1385-1396.
28. North M., Innes J., Zald H. Comparison of thinning and prescribed fire restoration treatments to Sierran mixed-conifer historic conditions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2007, 37:331-342.
29. Noss R.F., Franklin J.F., Baker W.L., Schoennagel T., Moyle P.B. Managing fire prone forests in the western United States. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2006, 8:481-487.
30. Pinheiro J.C., Bates D.M. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS 2004, Springer, New York.
31. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2009, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
32. Schwilk D.W., Keeley J.E., Knapp E.E., McIver J., Bailey J.D., Fettig C.J., Fiedler C.E., Harrod R.J., Moghaddas J.J., Outcalt K.W., Skinner C.N., Stephens S.L., Waldrop T.A., Yaussy D.A., Youngblood A. The national fire and fire surrogate study: effects of fuel reduction methods on forest vegetation structure and fuels. Ecological Applications 2009, 19:285-304.
33. Schwilk D.W., Knapp E.E., Ferrenberg S.M., Keeley J.E., Caprio A.C. Tree mortality from fire and bark beetles following early and late season prescribed fires in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management 2006, 232:36-45.
34. Stephens S.L., Moghaddas J.J. Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behavior, and predicted tree mortality in a California mixed conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management 2005, 215:21-36.
35. Stephens S.L., Moghaddas J.J., Edminster C., Fiedler C.E., Haase S., Harrington M., Keeley J.E., Knapp E.E., McIver J.D., Metlen K. Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire severity in western US forests. Ecological Applications 2009, 19:305-320.
36. Stephenson, N.L., 1988. Climatic control of vegetation distribution: the role of the water-balance with examples from North America and Sequoia National Park, California. Dissertation. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
37. Stephenson N.L. Reference conditions for giant sequoia forest restoration: structure, process, and precision. Ecological Applications 1999, 9:1253-1265.
38. Swetnam T.W., Baisan C.H., Caprio A.C., Brown P.M., Touchan R., Anderson R.S., Hallett D.J. Multi-millennial fire history of the Giant Forest, Sequoia National Park, California, USA. Fire Ecology 2009, 5:120-150.
39. Taylor A. Identifying forest reference conditions on early cut-over lands, Lake Tahoe Basin, USA. Ecological Applications 2004, 14:1903-1920.
40. van Mantgem P.J., Schwilk D.W. Negligible influence of spatial autocorrelation in the assessment of fire effects in a mixed conifer forest. Fire Ecology 2009, 5:116-125.
41. van Mantgem P.J., Stephenson N.L. Apparent climatically-induced increase of mortality rates in a temperate forest. Ecology Letters 2007, 10:909-916.
42. van Mantgem P.J., Stephenson N.L., Byrne J.C., Daniels L.D., Franklin J.F., Fulé P.Z., Harmon M.E., Larson A.J., Smith J.M., Taylor A.H., Veblen T.T. Widespread increase of tree mortality rates in the western United States. Science 2009, 323:521-524.
43. van Wagtendonk, J.W., 1996. Use of a deterministic fire model to test fuel treatments. In: Erman, D.C. (Ed.), Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project. Final Report to Congress, vol. II. Wildlands Resources Center Report No. 37, Centers for Water and Wildlands Resources, University of California, Davis, CA, pp. 1155-1167.
44. Webster K.M., Halpern C.B. Long-term vegetation responses to reintroduction and repeated use of fire in mixed-conifer forests of the Sierra Nevada. Ecosphere 2010, 1:art9.
45. Youngblood A., Grace J., Mc Iver J. Delayed conifer mortality after fuel reduction treatments: interactive effects of fuel, fire intensity, and bark beetles. Ecological Applications 2009, 19:321-337.