Fifteen years of sacral nerve stimulation: From an open procedure to a minimally invasive technique

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 13, Issue SUPPL.2, 2011, Pages 1-4

  Hetzer, F H ^a  

^a Hospitals Schaffhausen   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Faecal incontinence; Minimally invasive surgery; Pelvic floor disorders; Sacral nerve stimulation

Indexed keywords

ELECTRODE; FECES INCONTINENCE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NERVE STIMULATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SACRAL NERVE STIMULATION; SAFETY; THERAPY EFFECT;

ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; FECAL INCONTINENCE; HUMANS; LUMBOSACRAL PLEXUS;

EID: 79551520325     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02517.x     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Schmidt RA, Bruschini H, Tanagho EA. Sacral root stimulation in controlled micturition. Peripheral somatic neurotomy and stimulated voiding. Invest Urol 1979; 17: 130-4.
2. Tanagho EA, Schmidt RA, Orvis BR. Neural stimulation for control of voiding dysfunction: a preliminary report in 22 patients with serious neuropathic voiding disorders. J Urol 1989; 142: 340-5.
3. Schmidt RA, Jonas U, Oleson KA et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of refractory urinary urge incontinence. Sacral Nerve Stimulation Study Group. J Urol 1999; 162: 352-7.
4. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, Gall FP. Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 1995; 346: 1124-7.
5. Spinelli M, Giardiello G, Gerber M, Arduini A, van den HU, Malaguti S. New sacral neuromodulation lead for percutaneous implantation using local anesthesia: description and first experience. J Urol 2003; 170: 1905-7.
6. Hetzer FH, Hahnloser D, Knoblauch Y, Lohlein F, Demartines N. New screening technique for sacral nerve stimulation under local anaesthesia. Tech Coloproctol 2005; 9: 25-8.
7. Scheepens WA, van Koeveringe GA, de Bie RA, Weil EH, van Kerrebroeck PE. Long-term efficacy and safety results of the two-stage implantation technique in sacral neuromodulation. BJU Int 2002; 90: 840-5.
8. Kessler TM, Madersbacher H, Kiss G. Prolonged sacral neuromodulation testing using permanent leads: a more reliable patient selection method? Eur Urol 2005; 47: 660-5.
9. Pannek J, Grigoleit U, Hinkel A. Bacterial contamination of test stimulation leads during percutaneous nerve stimulation. Urology 2005; 65: 1096-8.
10. Everaert K, Kerckhaert W, Caluwaerts H et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing the 1-stage with the 2-stage implantation of a pulse generator in patients with pelvic floor dysfunction selected for sacral nerve stimulation. Eur Urol 2004; 45: 649-54.
11. Scheepens WA, Weil EH, van Koeveringe GA et al. Buttock placement of the implantable pulse generator: a new implantation technique for sacral neuromodulation - a multicenter study. Eur Urol 2001; 40: 434-8.
12. Sievert KD, Matzel K, Ratto C et al. Permanente sakrale Neuromodulation mittels InterStim™: Ergenisse einer Anwenderbefragung zu aktuellen technischenEntwicklungen. J Urol Urogynäkolol 2007; 14: 14-6.
13. Borawski KM, Foster RT, Webster GD, Amundsen CL. Predicting implantation with a neuromodulator using two different test stimulation techniques: a prospective randomized study in urge incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn 2007; 26: 14-8.
14. Maeda Y, Norton C, Lundby L, Buntzen S, Laurberg S. Predictors of the outcome of percutaneous nerve evaluation for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 1096-102.