The Effect of Surface Processing of Titanium Implants on the Behavior of Human Osteoblast-Like Saos-2 Cells

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 64-70

  Klinger, Avigdor ^a   Tadir, Anat ^a   Halabi, Amal ^a   Shapira, Lior ^a  

^a HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Cell differentiation; Osteoblast; Surface properties

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; DENTAL ALLOY; FLUORIDE VARNISH; OSTEOCALCIN; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; METABOLISM; METALLURGY; OSTEOBLAST; PHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TUMOR CELL CULTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; FLUORIDES, TOPICAL; HUMANS; METALLURGY; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOCALCIN; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TUMOR CELLS, CULTURED;

EID: 79551516866     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00177.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Vogler EA. Thermodynamics of short-term cell adhesion in vitro. Biophys J 1988; 53:759-769.
2. Vogler EA. A thermodynamic model of short-term cell adhesion in vitro. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 1989; 42:233-254.
3. Vogler EA. Interfacial chemistry in biomaterials science. In: Berg J, ed. Wettability (surfact science series). Vol. 49. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1993:184-250.
4. Barngrover D. Substrata for anchorage-dependent cells. In: Thilly WG, ed. Mammalian cell technology. Boston, MA: Butterworths, 1986:131-149.
5. Grinnell F. Cellular adhesiveness and extracellular substrata. In: Bourne GH, Danielli JF, Jeon KW, eds. International Review of Cytology. Vol. 53. New York: Academic Press, 1978:67-145.
6. Boyan BD, Bonewald LF, Paschalis EP, etal. Osteoblast-mediated mineral deposition in culture is dependent on surface microtopography. Calcif Tissue Int 2002; 71:519-529.
7. Zinger O, Zhao G, Schwartz Z, etal. Differential regulation of osteoblasts by substrate microstructural features. Biomaterials 2005; 26:1837-1847.
8. Teare DOH, Emmison N, Ton-That C, etal. Effects of serum on the kinetics of CHO attachment to ultraviolet-ozone modified polystyrene surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 2001; 234:84-89.
9. Lee JH, Lee HB. Platelet adhesion onto wettability gradient surfaces in the absence and presence of plasma proteins. J Biomed Mater Res A 1998; 41:304-311.
10. Andrade JD. Interfacial phenomena and biomaterials. Med Instrum 1973; 7:110-120.
11. Yamada KM, Kennedy DW. Dualistic nature of adhesive protein function: fibronectin and its biologically active peptide fragments can autoinhibit fibronectin function. J Cell Biol 1984; 99:29-36.
12. Mustafa K, Wennerberg A, Wroblewski J, etal. Determining optimal surface roughness of TiO(2) blasted titanium implant material for attachment, proliferation and differentiation of cells derived from human mandibular alveolar bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12:515-525.
13. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, etal. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004; 83:529-533.
14. Isa ZM, Schneider GB, Zaharias R, etal. Effects of fluoride-modified titanium surfaces on osteoblast proliferation and gene expression. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21:203-211.
15. Rodan SB, Imai Y, Thiede MA, etal. Characterization of human osteosarcoma cell line (Saos-2) with osteoblastic properties. Cancer Res 1987; 47:4961-4966.
16. Gronowicz G, McCarthy MB. Response of human osteoblasts to implant materials: integrin-mediated adhesion. J Orthop Res 1996; 14:878-887.
17. Kurachi T, Nagao H, Nagura H, etal. Effect of a titanium surface on bone marrow-derived osteoblastic cells in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 1997; 42:465-468.
18. Ong JL, Carnes DL, Cardens HL, etal. Surface roughness of titanium on bone morphogenetic protein-2 treated osteoblast cells in vitro. Implant Dent 1997; 6:19-24.
19. Groessner-Schreiber B, Tuan RS. Enhanced extracellular matrix production and mineralization by osteoblasts cultured on titanium surfaces in vitro. J Cell Sci 1992; 101:209-217.
20. Noth U, Hendrich C, Merklein F, etal. Standardized testing of bone implant surfaces with an osteoblast cell culture system II titanium surfaces of different degrees of roughness. Biomed Tech 1999; 44:6-11.
21. Viornery C, Guenther HL, Aronsson BO, etal. Osteoblast culture on polished titanium disks modified with phosphonic acids. J Biomed Mater Res A 2002; 62:149-155.
22. Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, etal. Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 1996; 32:55-63.
23. Postiglione L, Domenico GD, Montagnani S, etal. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) induces the osteoblastic differentiation of the human osteosarcoma cell line Saos-2. Eur J Histochem 2003; 47:309-316.
24. Lian JB, Stein GS. The developmental stages of osteoblast growth and differentiation exhibit selective responses of genes to growth factors (TGFbeta1) and hormones (vitamin D and glucocorticoids). J Oral Implantol 1993; 19:95-105.
25. Farley JR, Hall SL, Herring S, etal. Skeletal alkaline phosphatase activity is an index of the osteoblastic phenotype in subpopulations of the human osteosarcoma cell line Saos-2. Metabolism 1991; 40:664-671.
26. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Albouy JP, etal. Bone healing at implants with a fluoride-modified surface: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18:147-152.