메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

Reassessment of a calibration model by Bayesian reference analysis

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CALIBRATION FUNCTIONS; CALIBRATION MODEL; FUNCTIONAL DEPENDENCE; GAUSSIAN PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENTS; KNOWLEDGE DISTRIBUTION; MEASURAND; NON-INFORMATIVE PRIOR; POLYNOMIAL FUNCTIONS; POSTERIOR DISTRIBUTIONS; PRIOR INFORMATION; REFERENCE PRIOR; STANDARD DEVIATION;

EID: 79551500052     PISSN: 00261394     EISSN: 16817575     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/48/1/L02     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (11)

References (17)
  • 2
    • 33746890560 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of ISO-GUM, draft GUM supplement 1 and Bayesian statistics using simple linear calibration
    • Kacker R, Toman B and Huang D 2006 Comparison of ISO-GUM, draft GUM Supplement 1 and Bayesian statistics using simple linear calibration Metrologia 43 S167-77
    • (2006) Metrologia , vol.43
    • Kacker, R.1    Toman, B.2    Huang, D.3
  • 3
    • 43049087780 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of GUM supplement 1 and Bayesian analysis using a simple linear calibration model
    • Kyriazis G A 2008 Comparison of GUM Supplement 1 and Bayesian analysis using a simple linear calibration model Metrologia 45 L9-11
    • (2008) Metrologia , vol.45
    • Kyriazis, G.A.1
  • 4
    • 67650891634 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bayesian uncertainty analysis under prior ignorance of the measurand versus analysis using the supplement 1 to the guide: A comparison
    • Elster C and Toman B 2009 Bayesian uncertainty analysis under prior ignorance of the measurand versus analysis using the Supplement 1 to the Guide: a comparison Metrologia 46 261-6
    • (2009) Metrologia , vol.46 , pp. 261-266
    • Elster, C.1    Toman, B.2
  • 5
    • 79551485111 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Equivalence of alternative Bayesian procedures for evaluating measurement uncertainty
    • Lira I and Grientschnig D 2010 Equivalence of alternative Bayesian procedures for evaluating measurement uncertainty Metrologia 47 334-6
    • (2010) Metrologia , vol.47 , pp. 334-336
    • Lira, I.1    Grientschnig, D.2
  • 6
    • 0002902272 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reference priors with partial information
    • Sun D and Berger J O 1998 Reference priors with partial information Biometrika 85 55-71
    • (1998) Biometrika , vol.85 , pp. 55-71
    • Sun, D.1    Berger, J.O.2
  • 7
    • 0002464001 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Integrated likelihood methods for eliminating nuisance parameters
    • Berger J O, Liseo B and Wolpert R L 1999 Integrated likelihood methods for eliminating nuisance parameters Stat. Sci. 14 1-28
    • (1999) Stat. Sci. , vol.14 , pp. 1-28
    • Berger, J.O.1    Liseo, B.2    Wolpert, R.L.3
  • 10
    • 34249681831 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Draft GUM supplement 1 and Bayesian analysis
    • Elster C, Wöger W and Cox M G 2007 Draft GUM Supplement 1 and Bayesian analysis Metrologia 44 L31-2
    • (2007) Metrologia , vol.44
    • Elster, C.1    Wöger, W.2    Cox, M.G.3
  • 13
    • 77952009251 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Uncertainty in repeated measurement of a small non-negative quantity: Explanation and discussion of Bayesian methodology
    • Willink R 2010 Uncertainty in repeated measurement of a small non-negative quantity: explanation and discussion of Bayesian methodology Accred. Qual. Assur. 15 181-8
    • (2010) Accred. Qual. Assur , vol.15 , pp. 181-188
    • Willink, R.1
  • 14
    • 77952008782 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Response from the analytical methods committee (AMC) to the paper 'Uncertainty in repeated measurement of a small non-negative quantity: Explanation and discussion of Bayesian methodology'
    • Analytical Methods Committee, The Royal Society of Chemistry
    • Analytical Methods Committee, The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010 Response from the Analytical Methods Committee (AMC) to the paper 'Uncertainty in repeated measurement of a small non-negative quantity: explanation and discussion of Bayesian methodology' Accred. Qual. Assur. 15 189-91
    • (2010) Accred. Qual. Assur , vol.15 , pp. 189-191
  • 15
    • 74849094685 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • On the validity of methods of uncertainty evaluation
    • Willink R 2010 On the validity of methods of uncertainty evaluation Metrologia 47 80-9
    • (2010) Metrologia , vol.47 , pp. 80-89
    • Willink, R.1
  • 16
    • 0001141391 scopus 로고
    • On the development of reference priors
    • ed J M Bernardo et al Oxford: Oxford University Press
    • Berger J O and Bernardo J M 1992 On the development of reference priors Bayesian Statistics vol 4 ed J M Bernardo et al (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp 35-60
    • (1992) Bayesian Statistics , vol.4 , pp. 35-60
    • Berger, J.O.1    Bernardo, J.M.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.