Type-based MCMC

NAACL HLT 2010 - Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Main Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 573-581

  Liang, Percy ^a   Jordan, Michael I ^a   Klein, Dan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOCAL OPTIMA; PART OF SPEECH; WORD SEGMENTATION;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 79551498650     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. P. F. Brown, V. J. D. Pietra, P. V. deSouza, J. C. Lai, and R. L. Mercer. 1992. Class-based n-gram models of natural language. Computational Linguistics, 18:467-479.
2. T. Cohn, S. Goldwater, and P. Blunsom. 2009. Inducing compact but accurate tree-substitution grammars. In North American Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL), pages 548-556.
3. D. B. Dahl. 2003. An improved merge-split sampler for conjugate Dirichlet process mixture models. Technical report, Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin.
4. J. DeNero, M. Bansal, A. Pauls, and D. Klein. 2009. Efficient parsing for transducer grammars. In North American Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL), pages 227-235.
5. J. Gao and M. Johnson. 2008. A comparison of Bayesian estimators for unsupervised hidden Markov model POS taggers. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 344-352.
6. S. Goldwater and T. Griffiths. 2007. A fully Bayesian approach to unsupervised part-of-speech tagging. In Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
7. S. Goldwater, T. Griffiths, and M. Johnson. 2006. Contextual dependencies in unsupervised word segmentation. In International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING/ACL).
8. S. Goldwater, T. Griffiths, and M. Johnson. 2009. A Bayesian framework for word segmentation: Exploring the effects of context. Cognition, 112:21-54.
9. A. Haghighi and D. Klein. 2006. Prototype-driven learning for sequence models. In North American Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL), pages 320-327.
10. P. Liang, M. I. Jordan, and B. Taskar. 2007. A permutation-augmented sampler for Dirichlet process mixture models. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).
11. S. Petrov, L. Barrett, R. Thibaux, and D. Klein. 2006. Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation. In International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING/ACL), pages 433-440.
12. M. Post and D. Gildea. 2009. Bayesian learning of a tree substitution grammar. In Association for Computational Linguistics and International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (ACL-IJCNLP).
13. A. Stolcke and S. Omohundro. 1994. Inducing probabilistic grammars by Bayesian model merging. In International Colloquium on Grammatical Inference and Applications, pages 106-118.
14. R. H. Swendsen and J. S. Wang. 1987. Nonuniversal critical dynamics in MC simulations. Physics Review Letters, 58:86-88.
15. J. G. Wolff. 1988. Learning syntax and meanings through optimization and distributional analysis. In Categories and processes in language acquisition, pages 179-215.