Expanding the keratin mutation database: Novel and recurrent mutations and genotype-phenotype correlations in 28 patients with epidermolytic ichthyosis

British Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 164, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 442-447

  Arin, Meral J ^a   Oji, V ^b   Emmert, S ^c   Hausser, I ^d   Traupe, H ^b   Krieg, T ^a   Grimberg, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOKERATIN 1; CYTOKERATIN 10; KERATIN;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EPIDERMOLYTIC ICHTHYOSIS; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; HUMAN; ICHTHYOSIS; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

DATABASES, GENETIC; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; HYPERKERATOSIS, EPIDERMOLYTIC; KERATINS; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 79551487388     PISSN: 00070963     EISSN: 13652133     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10096.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Oji V, Tadini G, Akiyama M, et al. Revised nomenclature and classification of inherited ichthyoses: results of the First Ichthyosis Consensus Conference in Sorèze 2009. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 63: 607-41.
2. Arin MJ,. The molecular basis of human keratin disorders. Hum Genet 2009; 125: 355-73.
3. Porter RM, Lane EB,. Phenotypes, genotypes and their contribution to understanding keratin function. Trends Genet 2003; 19: 278-85.
4. Bolling MC, Bladergroen RS, van Steensel MA, et al. A novel mutation in the L12 domain of keratin 1 is associated with mild epidermolytic ichthyosis. Br J Dermatol 2010; 162: 875-9.
5. Kremer H, Lavrijsen AP, McLean WH, et al. An atypical form of bullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma is caused by a mutation in the L12 linker region of keratin 1. J Invest Dermatol 1998; 111: 1224-6.
6. Covaciu C, Castori M, De Luca N, et al. Lethal autosomal recessive epidermolytic ichthyosis due to a novel donor splice-site mutation in KRT10. Br J Dermatol 2010; 162: 1384-7.
7. Müller FB, Huber M, Kinaciyan T, et al. A human keratin 10 knockout causes recessive epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. Hum Mol Genet 2006; 15: 1133-41.
8. Terheyden P, Grimberg G, Hausser I, et al. Recessive epidermolytic hyperkeratosis caused by a previously unreported termination codon mutation in the keratin 10 gene. J Invest Dermatol 2009; 129: 2721-3.
9. Tsubota A, Akiyama M, Kanitakis J, et al. Mild recessive bullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma due to a previously unidentified homozygous keratin 10 nonsense mutation. J Invest Dermatol 2008; 128: 1648-52.
10. DiGiovanna JJ, Bale SJ,. Clinical heterogeneity in epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. Arch Dermatol 1994; 130: 1026-35.
11. Arin MJ, Longley MA, Anton-Lamprecht I, et al. A novel substitution in keratin 10 in epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. J Invest Dermatol 1999; 112: 506-8.
12. Virtanen M, Gedde-Dahl T Jr, Mörk NJ, et al. Phenotypic/genotypic correlations in patients with epidermolytic hyperkeratosis and the effects of retinoid therapy on keratin expression. Acta Derm Venereol 2001; 81: 163-70.
13. Morais P, Mota A, Baudrier T, et al. Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis with palmoplantar keratoderma in a patient with KRT10 mutation. Eur J Dermatol 2009; 19: 333-6.
14. Terron-Kwiatkowski A, Terrinoni A, Didona B, et al. Atypical epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma presentation associated with a mutation in the keratin 1 gene. Br J Dermatol 2004; 150: 1096-103. (Pubitemid 38932278)
15. Sybert VP, Francis JS, Corden LD, et al. Cyclic ichthyosis with epidermolytic hyperkeratosis: a phenotype conferred by mutations in the 2B domain of keratin K1. Am J Hum Genet 1999; 64: 732-8.
16. Sun XK, Ma LL, Xie YQ, et al. Keratin 1 and keratin 10 mutations causing epidermolytic hyperkeratosis in Chinese patients. J Dermatol Sci 2002; 29: 195-200.
17. Tsubota A, Akiyama M, Sakai K, et al. Congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma mimicking ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens. Br J Dermatol 2008; 158: 191-4.
18. Yang JM, Nam K, Kim HC, et al. A novel glutamic acid to aspartic acid mutation near the end of the 2B rod domain in the keratin 1 chain in epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. J Invest Dermatol 1999; 112: 376-9.
19. Ciubotaru D, Bergman R, Baty D, et al. Epidermolysis bullosa simplex in Israel: clinical and genetic features. Arch Dermatol 2003; 139: 498-505.
20. Rugg EL, Baty D, Shemanko CS, et al. DNA based prenatal testing for the skin blistering disorder epidermolysis bullosa simplex. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20: 371-7.
21. Rothnagel JA, Dominey AM, Dempsey LD, et al. Mutations in the rod domains of keratins 1 and 10 in epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. Science 1992; 257: 1128-30.
22. Shimomura Y, Sato N, Tomiyama K, et al. A sporadic case of epidermolytic hyperkeratosis caused by a novel point mutation in the keratin 1 gene. Clin Exp Dermatol 2006; 31: 286-7.
23. Tsubota A, Akiyama M, Sakai K, et al. Keratin 1 gene mutation detected in epidermal nevus with epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. J Invest Dermatol 2007; 127: 1371-4.
24. Moss C, Jones DO, Blight A, Bowden PE,. Birthmark due to cutaneous mosaicism for keratin 10 mutation. Lancet 1995; 345: 596.
25. Paller AS, Syder AJ, Chan YM, et al. Genetic and clinical mosaicism in a type of epidermal nevus. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1408-15.
26. Nazzaro V, Ermacora E, Santucci B, et al. Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis: generalized form in children from parents with systematized linear form. Br J Dermatol 1990; 122: 417-22.
27. Chassaing N, Kanitakis J, Sportich S, et al. Generalized epidermolytic hyperkeratosis in two unrelated children from parents with localized linear form, and prenatal diagnosis. J Invest Dermatol 2006; 126: 2715-17.
28. Reddy BS, Thadeus J, Kumar SK, et al. Generalized epidermolytic hyperkeratosis in a child born to a parent with systematized epidermolytic linear epidermal nevus. Int J Dermatol 1997; 36: 198-200.
29. Irvine AD, McLean WH,. Human keratin diseases: the increasing spectrum of disease and subtlety of the phenotype-genotype correlation. Br J Dermatol 1999; 140: 815-28.