Optimization of water level monitoring network in polder systems using information theory

Water Resources Research

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Alfonso, Leonardo ^a   Lobbrecht, Arnold ^a,b   Price, Roland ^a  

^a UNESCO IHE INSTITUTE FOR WATER EDUCATION   (Netherlands)

^b HydroLogic   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMOUNT OF INFORMATION; INFORMATION CONTENTS; JOINT ENTROPY; MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM; NETHERLANDS; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; POTENTIAL SITES; WATER LEVEL MONITORING;

ENTROPY; INFORMATION THEORY; MONITORING; WATER LEVELS;

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

CORRELATION; ENTROPY; HYDRAULIC STRUCTURE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; WATER LEVEL;

DELFLAND; NETHERLANDS; SOUTH HOLLAND;

EID: 79551481536     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2009WR008953     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Alfonso, L., A. Lobbrecht, and R. Price (2010), Information theory-based approach for location of monitoring water level gauges in polders, Water Resour. Res., 46, W03528, doi:10.1029/2009WR008101.
2. Amorocho, J., and B. Espildora (1973), Entropy in the assessment of uncertainty in hydrologic systems and models, Water Resour. Res., 9, 1511-1522.
3. Barreto, W. J., et al. (2006), Approaches to multi-objective multi-tier optimization in urban drainage planning, paper presented at International Conference on Hydroinformatics, Int. Assoc. for Hydroenviron. Eng. and Res., Nice, France.
4. Caselton, W. F., and T. Husain (1980), Hydrologic networks: information transmission, J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage, 106, 503-520.
5. Cover, T. M., and J. A. Thomas (1991), Information Theory, John Wiley, New York.
6. Deb, K., et al. (2002), A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 6, 182-197.
7. Husain, T. (1989), Hydrologic uncertainty measure and network design, Water Resour. Bull, 25, 527-534.
8. Kraskov, A., H. Stoegbauer, R. G. Andrzejak, and P. Grassberger (2005), Hierarchical clustering based on mutual information, Europhys. Lett., 70, 278.
9. Krstanovic, P. F., and V. P. Singh (1992), Evaluation of rainfall networks using entropy: I. Theoretical development, Water Resour. Manage, 6, 279-293.
10. Lobbrecht, A. H. (1997), Dynamic Water-System Control: Design and Operation of Regional Water-Resources Systems, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
11. Markus, M., et al. (2003), Entropy and generalized least square methods in assessment of the regional value of streamgages, J. Hydrol., 283, 107-121.
12. Maruyama, T., et al. (2005), Entropy-based assessment and clustering of potential water resources availability, J. Hydrol., 309, 104-113.
13. McGill, W. J. (1954), Multivariate information transmission, Psychometrika, 19, 97-116.
14. Mishra, A. K., and P. Coulibaly (2009), Developments in hydrometric network design: A review, Rev. Geophys., 47, RG2001, doi:10.1029/2007RG000243.
15. Mishra, A. K., et al. (2009), An entropy-based investigation into the variability of precipitation, J. Hydrol., 370, 139-154.
16. Mogheir, Y., and V. P. Singh (2002), Application of information theory to groundwater quality monitoring networks, Water Resour. Manage., 16, 37-49.
17. Ruddell, B. L., and P. Kumar (2009), Ecohydrologic process networks: 1. Identification, Water Resour. Res., 45, W03419, doi:10.1029/ 2008WR007279.
18. Singh, V. P. (1997), The use of entropy in hydrology and water resources, Hydrol. Processes, 11, 587-626.
19. Watanabe, S. (1960), Information theoretical analysis of multivariate correlation, IBM J. Res. Dev., 4, 66-82.
20. Yang, Y., and D. H. Burn (1994), An entropy approach to data collection network design, J. Hydrol., 157, 307-324.