They Might Retain Capacities to Consent But Do They Even Care?

AJOB Neuroscience

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 41-42

  Cabrera, Laura ^a  

^a Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551480220     PISSN: 21507740     EISSN: 21507759     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2010.537300     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Appelbaum, P., and T. Grisso. 2004. The MacArthur Treatment Competency Study. http://www.macarthur.virginia.edu/treatment.html#N 1 (accessed October 16, 2010).
2. Appelbaum, P. S., T. Grisso, E. Frank, S. O'Donnell, and D. J.Kupfer. 1999. Competence of depressed patients. American Journal of Psychiatry 156(9): 1380-1384.
3. Dunn, L.B., P. E. Holtzheimer, J.G. Hoop, H. S. Mayberg, L. Roberts, and P. S. Appelbaum. 2011. Ethical issues in deep brain stimulation research for treatment-resistant depression: Focus on risk and consent. AJOB Neuroscience 2(1): 29-36.
4. Elliot, C. 1997. Caring about risks: Are severely depressed patients competent to consent to research? Archives of General Psychiatry 54(2): 113-116.
5. Kuhn, J., W. Gaebel, J. Klosterkoetter, and C. Woopen. 2009. Deep brain stimulation as a new therapeutic approach in therapyresistant mental disorders: Ethical aspects of investigational treatment. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 259(suppl. 2): S135-S141.