Sustaining sustainability science: The role of established inter-disciplines

Ecological Economics

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 835-843

  Kastenhofer, Karen ^a   Bechtold, Ulrike ^a   Wilfing, Harald ^b  

^a ERICH SCHMID INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Ecological economics; Inter disciplines; Science and technology studies; Sustainability science; Technology assessment

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 79451470627     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Anderies J.M., Rodriguez A.A., Jannsen M.A., Cifdaloz O. Panaceas, uncertainty, and the robust control framework in sustainability science. PNAS 2007, 104(39):15194-15199.
2. Baumgärtner S., Becker C., Frank K., Müller B., Quaas M. Relating the philosophy and practice of ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 67(3):384-393.
3. Bechtold U., Kastenhofer K., Wilfing H. Does ecological economics foster participation? Reflecting upon direct and indirect forms of interacting with society 2010.
4. Berkes F., Colding J., Folke C. Navigating social-ecological systems. Building resilience for complexity and change 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. Bimber B. The politics of expertise in congress: the rise and fall of the office of technology assessment 1996, State University of New York Press, Albany.
6. Boulding K.E. The economics of the coming spaceship Earth. Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy. Resources for the Future 1966, 3-14. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. H. Jarett (Ed.).
7. Burger P., Kaufmann-Hayoz R. Einführung. Nachhaltigkeitsforschung - Perspektiven der Sozial- und Geisteswissenschaften, Schweizerische Akademie der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften, Bern 2007, 5-11. R. Kaufmann, P. Burger, M. Stoffel (Eds.).
8. Clark W.C. Sustainability science: a room of its own. PNAS 2007, 104(6):1737-1738.
9. Clark W.C., Dickson N.M. Sustainability science: the emerging research program. PNAS 2003, 100(14):8059-8061.
10. Cohen S., Demeritt D., Robinson J., Rothman D. Climate change and sustainable development: towards dialogue. Glob. Environ. Change 1998, 8(4):341-371.
11. Collins H.M., Evans R. The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Soc. Stud. Sci. 2002, 32(2):235-296.
12. Common M., Stagl S. Ecological economics. An introduction 2005, University Press, Cambridge.
13. Costanza R. The early history of ecological economics and the international society for ecological economics (ISEE), ISEE, Internet Encyclopaedia of Ecological Economics Date of access: 24.05.2009. http://www.ecoeco.org/pdf/costanza.pdf.
14. Ecological economics. Special issue. Ecol. Modell. 1987, 38(1/2).
15. Costanza R., Cumberland J., Daly H.E., Goodland R., Norgaard R. An introduction to ecological economics 1997, St. Lucie Press, Florida.
16. Daly H.E. On economics as a life science. J. Polit. Econ. 1968, 76:392-406.
17. Decker M. Praxis und Theorie der Technikfolgenabschätzung. Erste Überlegungen zu einer methodischen Rekonstruktion. TATUP Technikfolgenabschätzung Theor. Prax. 2008, 1(16):25-34.
18. Bridges Between Science, Society and Policy Technology Assessment - Methods and Impacts 2004, Springer Verlag, Berlin. M. Decker, M. Ladikas (Eds.).
19. Faber M. How to be an ecological economist. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 66(1):1-7.
20. Fuller S. Book review: can science studies be spoken in a civil tongue?. Soc. Stud. Sci. 1994, 24(1):143-168.
21. Science for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development 1999, 2. 3. S.O. Funtowicz, M. O'Connor (Eds.).
22. Funtowicz S.O., Ravetz J.R. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 1993, 25(7):739-755.
23. Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M. The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies 1994, SAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi.
24. Gieryn T.F. Relativist/constructivist programmes in the sociology of science: redundance and retreat. Soc. Stud. Sci. 1982, 12(2):279-297.
25. Gowdy J., Mesner S. The evolution of Georgescu-Roegen's bioeconomics. Rev. Soc. Econ. 1998, 56(2):136-156.
26. Grunwald A. Technikfolgenabschätzung - eine einführung 2002, Sigma, Berlin.
27. Guston D. Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2001, 26(4):399-408.
28. Guston D., Sarewitz D. Real-time technology assessment. Technol. Soc. 2002, 24(1):93-109.
29. Heinrichs H. Sustainability science': Neues Selbstverständnis und neue Konzepte in der Wissenschaft. Orte nachhaltiger Entwicklung: Transdisziplinäre Perspektiven 2003, 10-14. VÖW, Berlin. A. Volkens, C. Fischer, A. Karmanski, S. Sonja Bartelt, H. Heinrichs (Eds.).
30. Huutoniemi K., Klein J.T., Bruun H., Hukkinen J. Analyzing interdisciplinarity: typology and indicators. Res. Policy 2010, 39:79-88.
31. Integration of Economy and Ecology: An Outlook for the Eighties 1984, University of Stockholm Press, Stockholm. A.M. Jansson (Ed.).
32. Johnson E.S. Out of my viewfinder, yet in the picture seeing the hospital in medical simulations. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2008, 33(1):53-76.
33. Participatory technology assessment. European Perspectives 2002, Centre for the Study of Democracy, London. S. Joss, S. Bellucci (Eds.).
34. Jung C. Ironists, reformers, rebels? A workshop report. EASST Rev. 2009, 28(1):5-6.
35. Kajikawa Y. Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustain. Sci. 2008, 3:215-239.
36. Kates R.W., Clark W.C., Corell R., et al. Sustainability science. Science 2001, 292:641-642.
37. Klein J.T. Interdisciplinarity: history. Theory and Practice 1990, Wayne State Univ. Press, Detroit.
38. Klemperer A., Theisens H., Kaiser F. Dancing in the dark: the relationship between policy research and policy making in dutch higher education. Comp. Educ. Rev. 2001, 45(2):197-219.
39. Komiyama H., Takeuchi K. Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain. Sci. 2006, 1:1-6.
40. Labinger J.A. Science as culture: a view from the petri dish. Soc. Stud. Sci. 1995, 25(2):285-306.
41. Löwy I., Gaudillière J.-P. Localizing the global: testing for hereditary risks of breast cancer. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2008, 33(3):299-325.
42. Luks F. The rhetorics of ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 1998, 26(2):139-149.
43. Müller A. A flower in full blossom? Ecological economics at the cross-roads between normal and post-normal science. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 45(1):19-27.
44. Myers N. Molecular embodiments and the body-work of modeling in protein crystallography. Soc. Stud. Sci. 2008, 38(2):163-199.
45. Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons M. Re-Thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty 2001, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
46. Ostrom E., Janssen M.A., Anderies J.M. Going beyond panaceas. PNAS 2007, 104(39):15176-15178.
47. Paavola J., Gouldson A. Plural methodologies in climate change research 2009, 1st July 2009, Paper presented at the.
48. Perrings C. Going beyond panaceas: future challenges. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2007, 104:15179-15180.
49. Rapport D.J. Sustainability science: an ecohealth perspective. Sustain. Sci. 2007, 2:77-84.
50. Rip A., Voss J.-P. Umbrella terms in the governance of emerging science and technology: bridging the tension between relevance and scientific advance. Paper Presented at the Jahrestagung des Arbeitskreises Politik und Technik: "Governance von Zukunftstechnologien", Berlin 2009, 22nd May 2009.
51. Managing Technology in Society - The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment 1995, Cassell Publishers Ltd., London. A. Rip, T.J. Misa, J. Schot (Eds.).
52. Rodemeyer M. Back to the future: revisiting OTA ten years later. The Future of Technology Assessment 2005, 6-13. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC. M. Rodemeyer, D. Sarewitz, J. Wilsdon (Eds.).
53. Røpke I. The early history of modern ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 50(3/4):293-314.
54. Sarewitz D. This won't hurt a bit: assessing and governing rapidly advancing technologies in a democracy. The Future of Technology Assessment 2005, 14-21. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC. M. Rodemeyer, D. Sarewitz, J. Wilsdon (Eds.).
55. Schwarz A., Nordmann A. The political economy of technoscience. Science in the Context of Application: Methodological Change, Conceptual Transformation, Cultural Reorientation 2010, 317-336. Springer, Dordrecht. M. Carrier, A. Nordmann (Eds.).
56. Shi T. Ecological economics as a policy science: rhetoric or commitment towards an improved decision making process on sustainability. Ecol. Econ. 2003, 48(1):23-36.
57. Smits, R., Leyten, A., 1991. Technology assessment: waakhond of speurhond (Technology assessment: watchdog or tracker? Towards an integral technology policy.), PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
58. Smits R., van Mekerk R., Guston D.H., Sarewitz D. The role of TA in systemic innovation policy. Innovation studies Utrecht, working paper series #08.01 Available at. http://www.geo.uu.nl/isu/pdf/isu0801.pdf.
59. Supper, A., 2007. A booming discipline short of discipline? 26years of STS-in-the-making in the journals 'Science, Technology, & Human Values' and 'Social Studies of Science' 1980-2005, Diploma thesis, Univ. of Vienna.
60. Svendsen M.N., Koch L. Unpacking the 'spare embryo': facilitating stem cell research in a moral landscape. Soc. Stud. Sci. 2008, 38(1):93-110.
61. Tacconi L. Scientific methodology for ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 1998, 27(1):91-105.
62. TAMI Technology assessment in Europe. Between Method and Impact 2004, EC-STRATA Program, Brussels.
63. Wilsdon J. Paddling upstreams: new currents in European technology assessment. The Future of Technology Assessment 2005, 22-29. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC. M. Rodemeyer, D. Sarewitz, J. Wilsdon (Eds.).
64. Wynne B. Representing policy constructions and interests in SSK. Soc. Stud. Sci. 1992, 22(3):575-580.