Constructions of inalienable possession: The role of inflectional morphology

Linguistics in the Netherlands

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 1-12

  Baauw, Sergio ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79451470150     PISSN: 09297332     EISSN: 15699919     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/avt.13.03baa     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Grimshaw, J. (1990) Argument Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.).
2. Higginbotham, J. (1987) ‘Indefiniteness and Predication’, in E.J. Reuland and A.G.B. ter Meulen, eds. The Representation of Indefiniteness, MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.).
3. Longobardi, G. (1994) ‘Reference and Proper Names: a Theory of N-Movement in Syntax and Logical Form’, Linguistic Inquiry 25.4, 609-665.
4. Longobardi, G. (1995) ‘On the Typological Unity of Indoeuropean and Semitic Structural Genitive’, ms., University of Venice.
5. Roberts, I.G. (1993) Verbs and Diachronic Syntax, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
6. Tellier, C. (1990) ‘Underived Nominals and the Projection Principle: Inherent Possessors’, NELS 20, 472-486
7. Zubizarreta M.L. and J.R. Vergnaud (1992) ‘The Definite Determiner and the Inalienable Constructions in French and in English’, Linguistic Inquiry 23, 595-652.
8. Zwarts, J. (1992) X '-Syntax — X’-Semantics, PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.