Comparison of intraductal spread on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with clinicopathologic features in breast cancer

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 515-518

  Komatsu, Shuhei ^a,b   Lee, Chol Joo ^a   Hosokawa, Yohei ^a   Ichikawa, Daisuke ^a,b   Hamashima, Takashi ^a   Shirono, Koichi ^a   Okabe, Harumi ^a   Kurioka, Hideaki ^a   Oka, Takahiro ^a  

^a KYOTO FIRST RED CROSS HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b KYOTO PREFECTURAL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast conserving surgery; Contrast enhanced MRI; Intraductal spread; MRI

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DUCT; BREAST METASTASIS; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER SIZE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT PLANNING; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER INVASION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; METASTASIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 7944239007     PISSN: 03682811     EISSN: 14653621     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyh094     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Nystrom L, Larsson LG, Rutqvist LE, et al. Determination of cause of death among breast cancer cases in the Swedish randomized mammography screening trials. A comparison between official statistics and validation by an endpoint committee. Acta Oncol 1995;34:145-52.
2. Anscher MS, Jones P, Prosnitz LR, et al. Local failure and margin status in early-stage breast carcinoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy. Ann Surg 1993;218:22-8.
3. Fortin A, Larochelle M, Laverdiere J, Lavertu S, Tremblay D. Local failure is responsible for the decrease in survival for patients with breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:101-9.
4. The Japanese Breast Cancer Society: General rules for clinical and pathological recording of breast cancer, 14th Edition. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co, 2000 (in Japanese).
5. Osteen RT. Strategies for breast-conserving surgery. An unresolved dilemma. Cancer 1995;75:1563-5.
6. Voogd AC, Nab HW, Crommelin MA, van der Heijden LH, Kluck HM, Coebergh JW. Comparison of breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy for the treatment of early breast cancer in community hospitals. Eur J Surg Oncol 1996;22:13-6.
7. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. J Am Med Assoc 1996;276:33-8.
8. Hlawatsch A, Teifke A, Schmidt M, Thelen M. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: Sonography versus MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1493-501.
9. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off response: Clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993;187:493-501.
10. Fisher U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: Effect of preoperative contast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapic approach. Radiology 1999;213:881-8.
11. Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L, Barclay J, Frankel S, Sickles E. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:110-9.
12. Buckley DL, Drew PJ, Mussurakis S, Monson JR, Horsman A. Microvessel density of invasive breast cancer assessed by dynamic Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:461-4.
13. van Dijke CF, Brasch RC, Roberts TP, et al. Mammary carcinoma model: correlation of macromolecular contrast-enhanced MR imaging characterizations of tumor microvasculature and histologic capillary density. Radiology 1996;198:813-8.
14. Furman-Haran E, Margalit R, Grobgeld D, Degani H. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging reveals stress-induced angiogenesis in MCF7 human breast tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:6247-51.
15. Degani H, Furman E, Fields S. Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of MCF7 human breast cancer: Pathophysiology and monitoring of treatment. Clin Chim Acta 1994;228:19-33.
16. Weinreb JC, Newstead G. MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 1995;196:593-610.