An estimate of error for the CCAMLR 2000 survey estimate of krill biomass

Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography

Volumn 51, Issue 12-13 SPEC.ISS., 2004, Pages 1237-1251

  Demer, David A ^a  

^a SOUTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC MEASURING INSTRUMENTS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; BIOMASS; HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MEASUREMENT ERRORS; OCEANOGRAPHY;

KRILL BIOMASS; SCOTIA SEA;

MARINE BIOLOGY;

BIOMASS; ERROR ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; ZOOPLANKTON;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; OCEANIC REGIONS; SCOTIA SEA; WORLD;

ANIMALIA; DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); EUPHAUSIACEA;

EID: 7944229994     PISSN: 09670645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2004.06.012     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. J.E. Blue Physical Calibration Rapports et procès-verbaux des réunions 184 1984 19 24
2. H. Bodholt, H. Nes, and H. Solli A new echo-sounder system Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics 11 3 1989 123 130
3. A.S. Brierley, C. Goss, J.L. Watkins, and P. Woodroffe Variations in echosounder calibration with temperature and some possible implications for acoustic surveys of krill biomass CCAMLR Science 5 1998 273 282
4. D. Chu, T.K. Stanton, and P.H. Wiebe Frequency dependence of sound backscattering from live individual zooplankton ICES Journal of Marine Science 49 1992 97 106
5. D. Chu, K.G. Foote, and T.K. Stanton Further analysis of target strength measurements of Antarctic krill at 38 and 120 kHz Comparison with deformed cylinder model and inference of orientation distribution Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93 5 1993 2985 2988
6. J. Dalen, and A. Lovik The influence of wind-induced bubbles on echo integration surveys Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 69 1981 1653 1659
7. Demer, D.A., 1994. Accuracy and precision of acoustic surveys of Antarctic krill. Ph.D. Thesis, Electrical and Computer Engineering/Applied Ocean Science, University of California, San Diego/Scripps Institution of Oceanography, unpublished, 144pp.
8. Demer, D.A., 1998. Some suggestions for acoustic protocols for the synoptic survey of FAO Area 48. Internal meeting document, WG-EMM-98/47, Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, Hobart, Tasmania.
9. Demer, D.A., Hewitt, R.P., 1992. Calibration of an acoustic echo-integration system in a deep tank, with system gain comparisons over standard sphere material, water temperature and time. CCAMLR Selected Scientific Papers. Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, Hobart, Tasmania, pp. 127-144.
10. D.A. Demer, and R.P. Hewitt Bias in acoustic biomass estimates of Euphausia superba due to diel vertical migration Deep Sea Research I 42 4 1993 455 475
11. D.A. Demer, and L.V. Martin Zooplankton target strength volumetric or areal dependence? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 98 2 1995 1111 1118
12. D.A. Demer, M.A. Soule, and R.P. Hewitt A multiple-frequency method for potentially improving the accuracy and precision of in situ target strength measurements Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105 4 1999 2359 2376
13. I. Everson Diurnal variations in mean volume backscattering strength of an Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) patch Journal of Plankton Research 4 1 1982 155 162
14. K.G. Foote Linearity of fisheries acoustics with addition theorems Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73 1983 1932 1940
15. K.G. Foote Maintaining precision calibrations with optimal copper spheres Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73 3 1983 1054 1063
16. K.G. Foote Spheres for calibrating an eleven-frequency acoustic measurement system ICES Journal of Marine Science 46 1990 284 286
17. K.G. Foote Speed of sound in Euphausia superba Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87 4 1990 1405 1408
18. Foote, K.G., 1990c. Equivalent beam angles for several standard transducers. ICES C.M. B:21.
19. K.G. Foote, and D.N. MacLennan Comparison of copper and tungsten carbide calibration spheres Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 75 2 1984 612 616
20. Foote, K.G., MacLennan, D.N., 1984b. Use of elastic spheres as calibration targets. FAO Fisheries Report 300, pp. 52-58.
21. K.G. Foote, and G. Stefansson Definition of the problem of estimating fish abundance over an area from acoustic line-transect measurements of density ICES Journal of Marine Science 50 1993 369 381
22. Foote, K.G., Knudsen, H.P., Vestnes, G., MacLennan, D.N., Simmonds, E.J., 1987. Calibration of acoustic instruments for fish density estimates: a practical guide. ICES Cooperative Research Report 144.
23. K.G. Foote, I. Everson, J.L. Watkins, and D.G. Bone Target strengths of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) at 38 and 120 kHz Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87 1990 16 24
24. Forbes, S.T., Nakken, D., 1972. Manual of methods for fisheries resources survey and appraisal. Part 2. The use of acoustical instruments for fish detection. FAO Manual of Fish Science.
25. R.E. Francois, and G.R. Garrison Sound absorption based on ocean measurements Part II Boric acid contribution and equation for total absorption. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 72 1982 1879 1890
26. M. Godlewska, and K. Klusek Vertical Distribution and Diurnal Migrations of Krill - Euphausia superba Dana - from Hydroacoustical Observations, SIBEX, December 1983/January 1984 Polar Biology 8 1987 17 22
27. C.H. Greene, T.K. Stanton, P.H. Wiebe, and S. McClatchie Acoustic estimates of Antarctic krill Nature 349 1991 110
28. C.F. Greenlaw, and R.K. Johnson Multiple-frequency acoustical estimation Biological Oceanography 2 1983 227 252
29. Greenlaw, C.F., Johnson, R.K., Pommeranz, T., 1980. Volume scattering strength predictions for Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba Dana). Meeresforschung - Reports on Marine Research vol. 28, pp. 48-55.
30. R.P. Hewitt, and D.A. Demer Krill Abundance Nature 353 1991 310
31. R.P. Hewitt, and D.A. Demer Dispersion and abundance of Antarctic krill in the vicinity of Elephant Island in the 1992 austral summer Marine Ecology Progress Series 99 1993 29 39
32. R.P. Hewitt, and D.A. Demer Acoustic estimates of krill biomass in the Elephant Island area 1981-1993 CCAMLR Science 1 1994 1 6
33. Hewitt, R.P., Watkins, J., Naganobu, M., Sushin, V., Brierley, A.S., Demer, D., Kasatkina, S. Takao, Y., Goss, C., Malyshko, A., Brandon, M., Kawaguchi, S., Siegel, V., Trathan, P., Emery, J., Everson, I., Miller, D., 2004. Biomass of Antarctic krill in the Scotia Sea as estimated from a multi-ship acoustic and net survey conducted in January-February 2000 and its use in revising an estimate of precautionary yield. Deep-Sea Research II, this issue [ doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2004.06.011 ].
34. D.V. Holliday, R.E. Pieper, and G.S. Kleppel Determination of zooplankton size and distribution with multifrequency acoustic technology ICES Journal of Marine Science 46 1 1989 52 61
35. Johannesson, K.A., Mitson, R.B., 1983. Fisheries Acoustics: A practical manual for aquatic biomass estimation. FAO Technical Paper 240, 249pp.
36. G.M. Jolly, and I. Hampton A stratified random transect design for acoustic surveys of fish stocks Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47 1990 1282 1291
37. Kils, U., 1981. The swimming behavior, swimming performance and energy balance of Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba. BIOMASS Scientific Series No. 3, 122pp.
38. K.V. Mackenzie Nine-term equation for sound speed in the oceans Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 70 1981 807 812
39. D.N. MacLennan, and S.T. Forbes Fisheries acoustics a review of general principles ICES Journal of Marine Science 184 1984 7 18
40. D.N. MacLennan, and S.T. Forbes Acoustic methods of fish stock estimation R.S. Bailey B.B. Parrish Developments in Fisheries Research in Scotland 1986 Fishing News (Books) London
41. MacLennan, D.N., Simmonds, E.J., 1992. Fisheries Acoustics. Chapman & Hill, London, 325pp.
42. L.S.P. Madureira, P. Ward, and A. Atkinson Differences in backscattering strength determined at 120 and 38 kHz for three species of Antarctic macroplankton Marine Ecology Progress Series 93 1993 17 24
43. D.E. McGehee, R.L. O'Driscoll, and L.V. Martin Traykovski Effects of orientation on acoustic scattering from Antarctic krill at 120 kHz Deep Sea Research II 45 7 1998 1273 1294
44. D.G.M. Miller, and I. Hampton Biology and ecology of the Antarctic krill Biomass Scientific Series 9 1989 1 166
45. Siegel, V., Kawaguchi, S., Ward, P., Litvinov, F., Sushin, V., Loeb, V., Watkins, J., 2004, Krill demography and large-scale distribution in the southwest Atlantic during January/February 2000, Deep-Sea Research II, this issue [ doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2004.06.013 ].
46. E.J. Simmonds A comparison between measured and theoretical equivalent beam angles for seven similar transducers Journal of Sound and Vibration 97 1984 117 128
47. Simmonds, E.J., 1984b. The effect of mounting on the equivalent beam angles of acoustic survey transducers. ICES C.M.B: 32, 5pp.
48. Simmonds, E.J., Williamson, N.J., Gerlotto, F., Aglen, A., 1992. Acoustic Survey Design and Analysis Procedures: A Comprehensive Review of Good Practice. ICES Cooperative Research Report 187, pp. 1-127.
49. Simrad Simrad EK500 Scientific Echo Sounder Instruction Manual 1993 Simrad Subsea A/S Horten, Norway
50. T.K. Stanton Sound scattering by cylinders of finite length. III. Deformed cylinders Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 86 2 1989 691 705
51. T.K. Stanton Simple approximate formulas for backscattering of sound by spherical and elongated objects Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 86 1989 1499 1510
52. T.K. Stanton, D. Chu, P.H. Wiebe, and C.S. Clay Average echoes from randomly oriented random-length finite cylinders Zooplankton models Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94 6 1993 3463 3472
53. T.K. Stanton, P.H. Wiebe, D. Chu, M.C. Benfield, L. Scanlon, LV. Martin, and R.L. Eastwood On acoustic estimates of zooplankton biomass ICES Journal of Marine Science 51 1994 505 512
54. Taylor, B.N., Kuyatt, C.E., 1993. Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results. NIST Technical Note 1297, US National Institute of Standards and Technology, 15pp.
55. W.D. Tesler Bias and precision in acoustic biomass estimation Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics 11 3 1989 202 211
56. Trathan, P.N., Agnew, D.J., Miller, D.G.M., Watkins, J.L., Everson, I., Thorley, M.R., Murphy, E., Murray, A.W.A., Goss, C., 1992. Krill biomass in Area 48 and Area 58: Recalculations of FIBEX data. CCAMLR Selected Scientific Papers. Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, Hobart, Tasmania, pp. 157-182.
57. P.N. Trathan, J.L. Watkins, A.W.A. Murray, A.S. Brierley, I. Everson, C. Goss, J. Priddle, K. Reid, P. Ward, R.P. Hewitt, D.A. Demer, M. Naganobu, S. Kawaguchi, V. Sushin, S.M. Kasatkina, S. Hedley, S. Kim, and T. Pauly The CCAMLR-2000 krill synoptic survey a description of the rationale and design CCAMLR Science 8 2001 1 23
58. J.L. Watkins, and A.S. Brierley Verification of acoustic techniques used to identify Antarctic krill ICES Journal of Marine Science 59 2002 1326 1336
59. H. Weinberg A Continuous-gradient curve-fitting technique for acoustic-ray analysis Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 50 3 1971 975 984
60. P.H. Wiebe, C.H. Greene, T.K. Stanton, and J. Burczynski Sound scattering by live zooplankton and micronekton empirical studies with a dual-beam acoustical system Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88 5 1990 2346 2360