Prediction of permeate flux for turbulent flow in cross flow electric field assisted ultrafiltration

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 369, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 77-87

  Sarkar, Biswajit ^a   De, Sirshendu ^b  

^a GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Electrophoresis; Membranes; Osmotic pressure; Turbulent flow; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

BOVINE SERUM ALBUMINS; CONCENTRATION PROFILES; CRITICAL ELECTRIC FIELD; CROSS FLOWS; CROSS-FLOW ULTRAFILTRATION; CROSSFLOW VELOCITIES; ELECTROLYTIC SOLUTION; FEED CONCENTRATION; MASS TRANSFER COEFFICIENT; MEMBRANE SURFACE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT CUTOFF; OPERATING CONDITION; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PARAMETRIC STUDY; PERMEATE FLUX; POLYPHENYLENES; RECTANGULAR CHANNEL; SHERWOOD NUMBERS; SIMILARITY SOLUTION; THEORETICAL MODELS; D.C. ELECTRIC FIELDS; THEORETICAL MODELING;

BODY FLUIDS; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; ELECTRIC FIELDS; ELECTROPHORESIS; MASS TRANSFER; MEMBRANES; ORGANIC POLYMERS; OSMOSIS; POLYPHENYLENE OXIDES; TURBULENT FLOW; ULTRAFILTRATION; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS;

PRESSURE EFFECTS; ELECTRIC FIELDS;

ELECTROLYTE; BOVINE SERUM ALBUMIN;

ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSFLOW FILTRATION; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRIC FIELD ASSISTED ULTRAFILTRATION; FLOW RATE; MEMBRANE CHANNEL; MEMBRANE COMPONENT; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PREDICTION; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; THEORETICAL MODEL; TURBULENT FLOW; ULTRAFILTRATION; DIFFUSION; ELECTROPHORESIS; ELECTROPHORETIC MOBILITY; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; GEOMETRY; HYDRODYNAMICS; HYDROLYSIS; MEMBRANE; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; POWER SUPPLY; SHEAR STRESS; STEADY STATE; THERMODYNAMICS; VELOCITY; WATER PERMEABILITY;

EID: 79251648541     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.043     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ghosh R., Li Q., Cui Z.F. Fractionation of BSA and Lysozyme using ultrafiltration: effect of gas sparging. AIChE J. 1998, 44:61-67.
2. Iritani E., Mukai Y., Murase T. Separation of binary protein mixture by ultrafiltration. Filtr. Sep. 1997, 34:967.
3. Zaghbani N., Hafiana A., Dhabhi M. Separation of methylene blue from aqueous solution by micellar enhanced ultrafiltration Separation. Sci. Technol. 2007, 55:117-124.
4. Wu M.L., Zall R.R., Tzeng W.C. Microfiltration and ultrafiltration comparison of apple juices clarification. J. Food Sci. 1990, 55:1162-1163.
5. Blatt W.F., Dravid A., Michaels A.S., Nelson L. Solute polarization and cake formation in membrane ultrafiltration: causes, consequences and control techniques. Membrane Science and Technology 1970, Plenum Press, New York. J.E. Flinn (Ed.).
6. Millward H.R., Bellhouse B.J., Walker G. Screw thread flow promoters: an experimental study of ultrafiltration and microfiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 106:269-279.
7. Cui Z.F., Wright K.I.T. Flux enhancement with gas sparging in downwards cross flow ultrafiltration: performance and mechanism. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 117:109-116.
8. Lucas D., Baudry M.R., Michel F., Chaufer B. Role of physico-chemical environment on ultrafiltration of lysozyme with inorganic membrane. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 1998, 136:109-122.
9. Ulbricht M., Belfort G. Surface modification of ultrafiltration membranes by low temperature plasma. II. Graft polymerization onto polyacrylonitrile and polysulfone. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 111:193-215.
10. Murad S. The role of magnetic fields on the membrane-based separation of aqueous electrolyte solutions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 417:465-470.
11. Moulik S.P., Copper F.C., Bier M. Forced-flow electrophoretic filtration of clay suspensions: filtration in an electric field. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1967, 24:427-432.
12. Henry D.J., Lawler L.F., Quoch C.H.A. A solid/liquid separation process based on cross-flow and electrofiltration. AIChE J. 1977, 23(6):851-858.
13. Yukawa H., Shimura K., Maniwa A. Cross flow electro-ultrafiltration for colloidal solution of protein. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 1983, 16(4):305-311.
14. Wakeman R.J., Tarleton E.S. Membrane fouling prevention in cross flow microfiltration by the use of electric fields. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1987, 42(4):829-842.
15. Jagannadh S.N., Muralidhara H.S. Electrokinetics method to control membrane fouling. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 35:1133-1140.
16. Wakeman R.J. Electrically enhanced microfiltration of albumin suspensions. Food Bioprod. Process 1998, 76(C1):53-59.
17. von Zumbusch P., Kulcke W., Brunner G. Use of alternating electrical fields as anti-fouling strategy in ultrafiltration of biological suspensions-introduction of a new experimental procedure for crossflow filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 142(1):75-86.
18. Weigert T.J., Altmann J., Ripperger S. Crossflow electrofiltration in pilot scale. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 159(1/2):253-262.
19. Mameri N., Oussedik S.M., Khelifa A., Belhocine D., Gharib H., Lounici H. Electric field applied in the ultrafiltration process. Desalination 2001, 138:291.
20. Park Y.G. Effect of an electric field during purification of protein using microfiltration. Desalination 2006, 191:404-410.
21. Enevoldsen A.D., Hansen E.B., Jonsson G. Electro-ultrafiltration of industrial enzyme solution. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 299:28-37.
22. Sarkar B., DasGupta S., De S. Prediction of permeate flux during osmotic pressure controlled electric field enhanced cross flow ultrafiltration. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 319:236-246.
23. Van der Berg G.B., Racz I.G., Smolders C.A. Mass transfer coefficients in cross flow ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1989, 47:25-51.
24. Gekas V., Hallstrom B. Mass transfer in the membrane concentration polarization layer under turbulent cross flow. I. Critical literature review and adaptation of existing Sherwood correlations to membrane operations. J. Membr. Sci. 1987, 30:153-170.
25. Hunter R.J. Zeta Potential in Colloid Science: Principles and Applications 1981, Academic Press, London.
26. Fox R.W., McDonald A.T. Introduction to Fluid Mechanics 1985, Wiley, New York.
27. De S., Bhattacharjee S., Bhattarcharya P.K., Sharma A. Generalized integral and similarly solution of the concentration profile for osmotic pressure controlled ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 130:99-121.
28. Bird R.B., Stewart W.E., Lightfoot E.N. Transport Phenomena 2002, John Wiley, Singapore.
29. Bowen W.R., Jenner F. Dynamic ultrafiltration model for charged colloidal dispersions: a Wigner-Seitz cell approach. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1995, 50:1707-1736.
30. Bowen W.R., Williams P.M. The osmotic pressure of electrostatically stabilized colloidal dispersions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1996, 184:241-250.
31. Bowen W.R., Mongruel A., Williams P.M. Prediction of the rate of cross-flow membrane ultrafiltration: a colloidal interaction approach. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1996, 51(18):4321.
32. White F.M. Fluid Mechanics 1999, McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
33. Linton W.H., Sherwood T.K. Mass transfer from solid shapes to water instreamline and turbulent flow. Chem. Eng. Prog. 1950, 46:258-262.