A note on free relative clauses in the theory of phases

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 183-192

  Ott, Dennis ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79251646976     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/LING_a_00036     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Boeckx, Cedric, and Sandra Stjepanović. 2001. Head-ing toward PF. Linguistic Inquiry 32:345-355.
2. Bresnan, Joan, and Jane Grimshaw. 1978. The syntax of free relatives in English. Linguistic Inquiry 9:331-391.
3. Bury, Dirk. 1998. Is what you see what you get? Matching effects and the derivation of free relatives. Master's thesis, University College London.
4. Caponigro, Ivano. 2002. Free relatives as DPs with a silent D and a CP complement. In Proceedings of WECOL 2000, ed. by Vida Samiian, 140-150. Fresno: California State University, De-partment of Linguistics.
5. Caponigro, Ivano, and Lisa Pearl. 2009. The nominal nature of when, where, and how: Evidence from free relatives. Linguistic In- quiry 40:155-175.
6. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Las- nik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89-155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In The cartog- raphy of syntactic structures. Vol. 3, Structures and beyond, ed. by Adriana Belletti, 104-131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Chomsky, Noam. 2007. Approaching UG from below. In Interfaces recursion Language?, ed. by Uli Sauerland and Hans-Martin Gärtner, 1-29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
11. Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, ed. by Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero, and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, 133-166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Citko, Barbara. 2008. Missing labels. Lingua 118:907-944.
13. Donati, Caterina. 2006. On wh-head movement. In Wh-movement: Moving on, ed. by Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng and Norbert Corver, 21-46. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Groos, Anneke, and Henk C. van Riemsdijk. 1981. Matching effects with free relatives: A parameter of core grammar. In Theory of markedness in generative grammar: Proceedings of the 1979 GLOW Conference, ed. by Adriana Belletti, Luciana Brandi, and Luigi Rizzi, 171-216.Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.
15. Harbert, Wayne. 1983. On the nature of the matching parameter. The Linguistic Review 2:237-284.
16. Iatridou, Sabine, Elena Anagnostopoulou, and Roumyana Izvorski. 2001. Some observations about the form and meaning of the perfect. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 189-238. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Jacobson, Pauline. 1995. On the quantificational force of English free relatives. In Quantification in natural languages, ed. by Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer, and Barbara H. Partee, 451-486. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18. Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Landau, Idan. 2007. Constraints on partial VP-fronting. Syntax 10: 127-164.
20. Muller, Gereon. 1995. A-bar syntax: A study in movement types. Ber- lin: Mouton de Gruyter.
21. Richards, Marc D. 2007. On feature inheritance: An argument from the Phase Impenetrability Condition. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 563-572.
22. Riemsdijk, Henk C. van. 2006a. Free relatives. In The Blackwell com- panion to syntax, ed. by Martin Everaert and Henk C. van Riemsdijk, 2:338-382. Oxford: Blackwell.
23. Riemsdijk, Henk C. van. 2006b. Grafts follow from Merge. In Phases of interpretation, ed. by Mara Frascarelli, 17-44. Berlin: Mou- ton de Gruyter.
24. Rooryck, Johan. 1994. Generalized Transformations and the wh-cycle: Free relatives as bare wh-CPs. Groninger Arbeiten zur german- istischen Linguistik 37:195-208.
25. Struckmeier, Volker. To appear. Ja doch wohl C? Modal particles in German as C-related elements. Linguistic Analysis.
26. Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1995. Extraposition from NP and prosodic structure. In NELS 24: Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, ed. by Jill N. Beckman, 503-517. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Graduate Student Linguistic Association.
27. Vogel, Ralf. 2001. Case conflict in German free-relative constructions: An optimality-theoretic treatment. In Competition in syntax, ed. by Gereon Muller and Wolfgang Sternefeld, 341-375. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
28. Vries, Mark de. 2004. Head-internal relative clauses in Dutch? In Linguistics in the Netherlands 2004, ed. by Leonie Cornies and Jenny Doetjes, 193-204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
29. Vries, Mark de. 2009. On multidominance and linearization. Biolin-guistics 3:344-403.