Assessment of waste management technology using BATNEEC options, technology quality method and multi-criteria analysis

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 92, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1314-1320

  Generowicz, Agnieszka ^a   Kulczycka, Joanna ^b   Kowalski, Zygmunt ^a   Banach, Marcin ^a  

^a CRACOW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b MINERAL AND ENERGY ECONOMY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

Author keywords

BATNEEC; Multi criteria analysis; Waste incineration; Waste management

Indexed keywords

INVESTMENTS; QUALITY CONTROL; WASTE DISPOSAL;

BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUE NOT ENTAILING EXCESSIVE COST; BIOLOGICAL PROCESS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; INCINERATION PLANT; MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES; MECHANICAL; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; MUNICIPAL WASTE; QUALITY METHODS; WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS;

WASTE INCINERATION;

BIOGAS;

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY; BIOGAS; EUROPEAN UNION; INCINERATION; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; WASTE DISPOSAL;

ARTICLE; BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUE NOT ENTAILING EXCESSIVE COST; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; INCINERATION; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; QUALITY CONTROL; RECYCLING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTE DISPOSAL;

AUSTRIA; MAZOWIECKIE; POLAND; TARNOBRZEG [POLAND]; VIENNA; WARSAW [MAZOWIECKIE];

EID: 79251612433     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.12.016     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Barlaz M., Cekander G.C., Vasuki N.C. Integrated solid waste management in the United States. Journal of Environmental Engineering 2003, 129:583-584.
2. Belton V., Stewart T. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. An Integrated Approach 2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Brechet T., Tulkens H. Beyond BAT: selecting optimal combinations of available techniques, with an example from the limestone industry. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:1790-1801.
4. Caruso C., Colorni A., Paruccini M. The regional urban solid waste management system: a modelling approach. European Journal of Operational Research 1993, 70(1):16-30.
5. den Boer E., Jedrczak A., Kowalski Z., Kulczycka J., Szpadt R. A review of municipal solid waste composition and quantities in Poland. Waste Management 2010, 30:369-377.
6. Dijkmans R. Methodology for selection of best available techniques (BAT) at the sector level. Journal of Cleaner Production 2000, 8(1):11-21.
7. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives.
8. Geldermann J., Rentz O. The reference installation approach for the techno-economic assessment of emission abatement options and the determination of BAT according to the IPPC-directive. Journal of Cleaner Production 2004, 12:389-402.
9. Generowicz A., 2000. Indexes of evaluations for multi-criteria selection of choice of regional system of wastes managing. Doctor's thesis, Cracow University of Technology.
10. Georgopoulou E., Hontou V., Gakis N., Sarafidis Y., Mirasgedis S., Lalas D.P., Loukatos A., Gargoulas N., Mentzis A., Economidis D., Triantafilopoulos T., Korizi K. BEAsT: a decision-support tool for assessing the environmental benefits and the economic attractiveness of best available techniques in industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 2008, 16(3).
11. Hokkanen J., Salminen P. Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 1997, 98(1):19-36.
12. Karagiannidis A., Moussiopoulos N. A model generating framework for regional waste management, taking local peculiarities explicitly into account. Location Science 1998, 6:281-305.
13. Klang A., Vikman P.-A., Btattebř H. Sustainable management of demolition waste - an integrated model for the evaluation of environmental, economic and social aspects. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2003, 38:317-334.
14. Koneczny K., Pennington D.W. Life cycle thinking in waste management: summary of the European Commission's Malta 2005 workshop and pilot studies. Waste Management 2007, 27:92-97.
15. Kosińska I., Kowalski Z. Assessment of the municipal waste disposal with the method of process analysis in terms of cumulative calculation. Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej. Inz̈ynieria Środowiska 2010, 58:77-90. (in polish).
16. Kowalski Z. Evaluation of options of production process modernisation on the example of the sodium chromate production process. Polish Journal of Chemical Technology 2001, 3(4):20-28.
17. Kowalski Z., Wzorek Z., Kulczycka J. Evaluation of best available techniques (BATs) on the example of the new solution of the sodium chromate production process. Mine waste management best available techniques 2003, CPBM Cuprum Wrocław and MEERI PAS Kraków.
18. Kowalski, Z., Kulczycka, J., 2009. Assessment of technology quality of different variants of municipal waste disposal and incineration. IGSMiE PAN, Kraków, unpublished (in polish).
19. Kulczycka J., Kowalski Z., Cholewa M. Municipal waste management in Polish national and local plans. Czasopismo Techniczne Politechniki Krakowskiej 2008, 2-Ch:13-24. (in polish).
20. Pearce D., Brisson I. BATNEEC: the economics of technology-based environmental standards with a UK case illustrations. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 1993, 9(4):24-40.
21. Practical assessment of the environment dtate in relation to EU Directive within a framework of programme PL2003/004-379.01.01.03, Phare, 2003 (in polish).