Do the findings of the Term Breech Trial apply to spontaneous breech birth?

Women and Birth

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-2

  Fahy, Kathleen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; MATERNAL CARE; MIDWIFE; MIDWIFERY EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TERM BIRTH; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

BREECH PRESENTATION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; PARTURITION; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME;

EID: 79251600163     PISSN: 18715192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2010.12.001     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Dunn P. Eric Bracht (1882-1969) of Berlin and his "breech" manoeuvre. Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition [serial on the Internet] 2003, 88. Available from: http://0-fn.bmj.com.library.newcastle.edu.au/content/88/1/F76.long.
2. Kotaska A. Inappropriate use of randomised trials to evaluate complex phenoma: case study of vaginal breech delivery. British Medical Journal 2004, 329:1036-1039.
3. Banks M. Breech birth woman-wise 1998, Birthspirit, Hamilton, New Zealand.
4. Plentl A., Stone R. The Bracht Maneuver. Obstetrical & Gynecological Review 1953, 8:313-325.
5. Hannah M., Hannah W.J., Hewson S.A., HE D, Saigal S., Willan A.R. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. The Lancet 2000, 356(October):1375-1383.