Pulsed magneto-motive ultrasound imaging using ultrasmall magnetic nanoprobes

Molecular Imaging

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 102-110

  Mehrmohammadi, Mohammad ^a   Oh, Junghwan ^a   Mallidi, Srivalleesha ^a   Emelianov, Stanislav Y ^a  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGH-STRENGTH; IMAGING MODALITY; IMAGING TOOLS; IN-VIVO IMAGING; INTERNAL TISSUES; LIVING CELL; MAGNETIC NANOPARTICLES; MOLECULAR COMPOSITIONS; MOLECULAR LEVELS; NANO-SIZED PARTICLES; PULSED MAGNETIC FIELDS; REAL TIME; ULTRA-SMALL; ULTRASOUND IMAGING;

MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETOS; NANOPARTICLES; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS; ULTRASONICS;

NANOMAGNETICS;

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; FERRIC ION; NANOPARTICLE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DRUG EFFECT; LIGHT; MACROPHAGE; MAGNETISM; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR PROBE; MOUSE; RADIATION SCATTERING; ULTRASOUND; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FERRIC COMPOUNDS; LIGHT; MACROPHAGES; MAGNETICS; MICE; MOLECULAR PROBES; NANOPARTICLES; SCATTERING, RADIATION; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 79251590810     PISSN: 15353508     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/7290.2010.00037     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Weissleder R, Mahmood U. Molecular imaging. Radiology 2001; 219:316-33. (Pubitemid 32336342)
2. Correas JM, Bridal L, Lesavre A, et al. Ultrasound contrast agents: Properties, principles of action, tolerance, and artifacts. Eur Radiol 2001;11:1316-28. (Pubitemid 32755614)
3. Debbage P, Jaschke W. Molecular imaging with nanoparticles: Giant roles for dwarf actors. Histochem Cell Biol 2008;130:845-75.
4. Pankhurst QA, Connolly J, Jones SK, Dobson J. Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J Phys [D] 2003;36:167-81.
5. Konda SD, Aref M, Wang S, et al. Specific targeting of folatedendrimer MRI contrast agents to the high affinity folate receptor expressed in ovarian tumor xenografts. Magma 2001;12:104-13. (Pubitemid 32510128)
6. Tartaj P, del Puerto Morales M, Veintemillas-Verdaguer S, et al. The preparation of magnetic nanoparticles for applications in biomedicine. J Phys [D] 2003;36:182-97.
7. Phelps ME. Inaugural article: Positron emission tomography provides molecular imaging of biological processes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:9226-33. (Pubitemid 30627544)
8. Nahmias C. Molecular imaging: The next frontier. Can Assoc Radiol J 2002;53:255-7. (Pubitemid 36119296)
9. Blasberg RG, Tjuvajev JG. Molecular-genetic imaging: Current and future perspectives. J Clin Invest 2003;111:1620-9. (Pubitemid 38057741)
10. Demos SM, Alkan-Onyuksel H, Kane BJ, et al. In vivo targeting of acoustically reflective liposomes for intravascular and transvascular ultrasonic enhancement. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:867-75.
11. Oh J, Feldman MD, Kim J, et al. Detection of magnetic nanoparticles in tissue using magneto-motive ultrasound. Nanotechnology 2006;17:4183-90. (Pubitemid 44424369)
12. Mehrmohammadi M, Oh J, Ma L, et al. Imaging of iron oxide nanoparticles using magneto-motive ultrasound. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. New York; 2007. p. 652-5.
13. Schenck JF. Safety of strong, static magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:2-19. (Pubitemid 30437260)
14. Wada S, Tazawa K, Suzuki N, et al. Pulp ablation therapy by inductive heating: Heat generation characteristics in the pulp cavity. Oral Dis 2007;13:193-7.
15. Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 1996;23:815-50. (Pubitemid 26192503)
16. Mallidi S, Aglyamov SR, Karpiouk AB, Emelianov S. Functional and morphological ultrasonic biomicroscopy for tissue engineers. Proceeding SPIE 2006;6147:61470Y1-7.
17. Cohn NA, Emelianov SY, Lubinski MA, O'Donnell M. An elasticity microscope. Part I: Methods. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1997;44:1304-19. (Pubitemid 127771325)
18. Lubinski MA, Emelianov SY, O'Donnell M. Speckle tracking methods for ultrasonic elasticity imaging using short-time correlation. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1999;46:82-96.
19. Hassan CM, Stewart JE, Peppas NA. Diffusional characteristics of freeze/thawed poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogels: Applications to protein controlled release from multilaminate devices. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2000;49:161-5. (Pubitemid 30126064)
20. D'Astous FT, Foster FS. Frequency dependence of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter in breast tissue. Ultrasound Med Biol 1986;12:795-808.
21. Sun X, Gutierrez A, Yacaman MJ, et al. Investigations on magnetic properties and structure for carbon encapsulated nanoparticles of Fe, Co, Ni. Mater Sci Eng A 2000;286:157-60.
22. Seo WS, Lee JH, Sun X, et al. FeCo/graphitic-shell nanocrystals as advanced magnetic-resonance-imaging and near-infrared agents. Nat Mater 2006;5:971.
23. Hsiao JK, Tai MF, Lee YC, et al. Labelling of cultured macrophages with novelmagnetic nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 2006;304:4-6.
24. Grass RN, Athanassiou EK, Stark WJ. Covalently functionalized cobalt nanoparticles as a platform for inexpensive magnetic separations in organic synthesis. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2007; 46:4909-12. (Pubitemid 47055956)
25. Bai J, Xu Y, Wang JP. Fabrication of core-shell type FeCo-Au (Ag) high moment magnetic nanoparticles. Proceeding of Materials Research Society. Boston; 2005. vol. 87, p. 6.6.1-6.
26. Bai J, Wang JP. High-magnetic-moment core-shell-type FeCo-Au/ Ag nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 2005;87:152502.
27. Zhao M, Kircher MF, Josephson L, Weissleder R. Differential conjugation of tat peptide to superparamagnetic nanoparticles and its effect on cellular uptake. Bioconjug Chem 2002;13:840-4. (Pubitemid 34801127)
28. Kang HW, Josephson L, Petrovsky A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of inducible E-selectin expression in human endothelial cell culture. Bioconjug Chem 2002;13:122-7. (Pubitemid 34119643)
29. Josephson L, Tung CH, Moore A, Weissleder R. High-efficiency intracellular magnetic labeling with novel superparamagnetic-tat peptide conjugates. Bioconjug Chem 1999;10:186-91. (Pubitemid 29147720)
30. Aaron J, Nitin N, Travis K, et al. Plasmon resonance coupling of metal nanoparticles for molecular imaging of carcinogenesis in vivo. J Biomed Optics 2007;12:034007.
31. Widder KJ, Senyei AE, Scarpelli DG. Magnetic microspheres: A model system for site specific drug delivery in vivo. Exp Biol Med 1978;158:141.
32. Senyei A, Widder K, Czerlinski G. Magnetic guidance of drug carrying microspheres. J Appl Phys 1978;49:3578.
33. Mosbach K, Schröder U. Preparation and application of magnetic polymers for targeting of drugs. FEBS Lett 1979;102:112.
34. Dobson J. Magnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery. Drug Dev Res 2006;67:55-60. (Pubitemid 43765049)
35. Yang Y, Rendig S, Siegel S, et al. Cardiac PET imaging in mice with simultaneous cardiac and respiratory gating. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50:2979-89. (Pubitemid 40905180)
36. Kreissl MC, Stout D, Silverman RW, et al. Heart and respiratory gating of cardiac microPETH/CT studies in mice. Proceeding of Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record; 2004. Vol. 6. p. 3877-79. (Pubitemid 41147786)
37. Cassidy PJ, Schneider JE, Grieve SM, et al. Assessment of motion gating strategies for mouse magnetic resonance at high magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:229-37. (Pubitemid 38166801)
38. Mehrmohammadi M, Aglyamov SR, Karpiouk AB, et al. Pulsed magneto-motive ultrasound to assess viscoelastic properties of soft tissues. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Ultrasonic Measurement and Imaging of Tissue Elasticity. Austin; 2008. p. 106.