Metaphyseal fracture healing follows similar biomechanical rules as diaphyseal healing

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 425-432

  Claes, Lutz ^a   Reusch, Martina ^a   Göckelmann, Melanie ^a   Ohnmacht, Michael ^a   Wehner, Tim ^a   Amling, Michael ^b   Beil, Frank T ^b   Ignatius, Anita ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

biomechanics; bone healing; histology; metaphyseal

Indexed keywords

AMOXICILLIN; CARPROFEN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENCHONDRAL OSSIFICATION; FEMALE; FEMUR CONDYLE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FEMUR OSTEOTOMY; FIBROCARTILAGE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FORCE; FRACTURE HEALING; IN VIVO STUDY; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; PATELLA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEEP; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; WALKING; X RAY;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONY CALLUS; DIAPHYSES; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FEMALE; FEMORAL FRACTURES; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FRACTURE HEALING; SHEEP; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 79251588445     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: 1554527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.21227     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Claes L, Augat P, Suger G, et al. 1997. Influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap on the success of fracture healing. J Orthop Res 15: 577-584.
2. Claes LE, Wilke HJ, Augat P, et al. 1995. Effect of dynamization on gap healing of diaphyseal fractures under external fixation. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 10: 227-234.
3. Uhthoff HK, Rahn BA,. 1981. Healing patterns of metaphyseal fractures. Clin Orthop 160: 295-303.
4. Aronson J, Shen X,. 1994. Experimental healing of distraction osteogenesis comparing metaphyseal with diaphyseal sites. Clin Orthop Relat Res 301: 25-30.
5. Fan W, Crawford R, Xiao Y,. 2008. Structural and cellular differences between metaphyseal and diaphyseal periosteum in different aged rats. Bone 42: 81-89.
6. Goodship AE, Kenwright J,. 1985. The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67: 650-655.
7. Kenwright J, Goodship AE,. 1989. Controlled mechanical stimulation in the treatment of tibial fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 241: 36-47.
8. Claes LE, Heigele CA,. 1999. Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. J Biomech 32: 255-266.
9. Claes L, Eckert-Hubner K, Augat P,. 2002. The effect of mechanical stability on local vascularization and tissue differentiation in callus healing. J Orthop Res 20: 1099-1105.
10. Epari DR, Schell H, Bail HJ, et al. 2006. Instability prolongs the chondral phase during bone healing in sheep. Bone 38: 864-870.
11. Müller J, Schenk R, Willenegger H,. 1968. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Entstehung reaktiver Pseudarthrosen am Hunderadius. Helv Chir Acta 35: 301-308.
12. Jarry L, Uhthoff HK,. 1971. Differences in healing of metaphyseal and diaphyseal fractures. Can J Surg 14: 127-135.
13. Stuermer EK, Sehmisch S, Rack T, et al. 2010. Estrogen and raloxifene improve metaphyseal fracture healing in the early phase of osteoporosis. A new fracture-healing model at the tibia in rat. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395: 163-172.
14. Claes L, Veeser A, Gockelmann M, et al. 2009. A novel model to study metaphyseal bone healing under defined biomechanical conditions. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129: 923-928.
15. Snyder SM, Schneider E,. 1991. Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography. J Orthop Res 9: 422-431.
16. Ruegsegger PKW,. 1993. A phantom for standardization and quality control in peripheral bone measurements by PQCT and DXA. Phys Med Biol 38: 1963-1970.
17. Keyak JH, Lee IY, Skinner HB,. 1994. Correlations between orthogonal mechanical properties and density of trabecular bone: use of different densitometric measures. J Biomed Mater Res 28: 1329-1336.
18. Hori RY, Lewis JL,. 1982. Mechanical properties of the fibrous tissue found at the bone-cement interface following total joint replacement. J Biomed Mater Res 16: 911-927.
19. Weibel ER,. 1963. Principles and methods for the morphometric study of the lung and other organs. Lab Invest 12: 131-155.
20. Claes L, Ruter A, Mayr E,. 2005. Low-intensity ultrasound enhances maturation of callus after segmental transport. Clin Orthop Relat Res 430: 189-194.
21. Hente R, Cheal EJ, Hagerty T, et al. 1991. Differentiation of repair tissue under controlled strain gradients. Orthop Trans 15: 520-521.
22. Soballe K, Hansen ES, H BR, et al. 1992. Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions. J Orthop Res 10: 285-299.