Efficient quantum state tomography

Nature Communications

Volumn 1, Issue 9, 2010, Pages

  Cramer, Marcus ^a   Plenio, Martin B ^a   Flammia, Steven T ^b   Somma, Rolando ^b   Gross, David ^c   Bartlett, Stephen D ^d   Landon Cardinal, Olivier ^e   Poulin, David ^e   Liu, Yi Kai ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^b PERIMETER INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Canada)

^c LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MEASUREMENT; QUANTUM YIELD; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 79251585238     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1147     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Vogel, K. & Risken, H. Determination of quasiprobability distributions in terms of probability distributions for the rotated quadrature phase. Phys. Rev. A 40, 2847-2849 (1989).
2. Smithey, D. T., Beck, M., Raymer, M. G. & Faridani, A. Measurement of the Wigner distribution and the density matrix of a light mode using optical homodyne tomography: application to squeezed states and the vacuum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1244-1247 (1993).
3. Häffner, H. R. Scalable multiparticle entanglement of trapped ions. Nature 438, 643-646 (2005).
4. Leibfried, D. Creation of a six-atom-Schrödinger cat-state. Nature 438, 639-643 (2005).
5. James, D. F. V., Kwiat, P. G., Munro, W. J. & White, A. G. Measurement of qubits. Phys. Rev. A 64, 052312(2001).
6. Dunn, T. J., Walmsley, I. A. & Mukamel, S. Experimental determination of the quantum-mechanical state of a molecular vibrational mode using fluorescence tomography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 884-887 (1995).
7. Lvovsky, A. I. & Raymer, M. G. Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 299-332 (2009).
8. Paris, M. & Řeháček, J. (eds) Quantum State Estimation, no. 649 in Lect. Notes Phys. (Springer, 2004).
9. Fannes, M., Nachtergaele, B. & Werner, R. F. Finitely correlated states on quantum spin chains. Comm. Math. Phys. 144, 443-490 (1992).
10. Perez-Garcia, D., Verstraete, F., Wolf, M. M. & Cirac, J. I. Matrix product state representations. Quant. Inf. Comp. 7, 401-430 (2007).
11. Vidal, G. Entanglement renormalization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 220405(2007).
12. Rizzi, M., Montangero, S. & Vidal, G. Simulation of time evolution with multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz. Phys. Rev. A 77, 052328(2008).
13. Östlund, S. & Rommer, S. Thermodynamic limit of density matrix renormalization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3537-3540 (1995).
14. Hastings, M. B. Solving gapped Hamiltonians locally. Phys. Rev. B 73, 085115(2006).
15. Hastings, M. B. An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems. J. Stat. Mech. P08024 (2007).
16. Bloch, I., Dalibard, J. & Zwerger, W. Many-body physics with ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885-964 (2008).
17. Schoen, C., Hammerer, K., Wolf, M. M., Cirac, J. I. & Solano, E. Sequential generation of entangled multiqubit states. Phys. Rev. A 75, 032311(2007).
18. Vidal, G. Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 147902(2003).
19. Gilchrist, A., Langford, A. K. & Nielsen, M. A. Distance measures to compare real and ideal quantum processes. Phys. Rev. A 71, 062310(2005).
20. Briegel, H. J. & Raussendorf, R. Persistent entanglement in arrays of interacting particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 910-913 (2001).
21. Candes, E. J. & Recht, B. Exact matrix completion via convex optimization. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.4471 (2008).
22. Cai, J-F., Candes, E. J. & Shen, Z. A singular value thresholding algorithm for matrix completion. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3286 (2008).
23. Candes, E. J. & Wakin, M. B. An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Sig Proc. Mag. 25, 21-30 (2008).
24. 1-norm minimization. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.4323 (2008).
25. Gross, D., Liu, Y-K., Flammia, S. T., Becker, S. & Eisert, J. Quantum state tomography via compressed sensing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 150401(2010).
26. Gross, D. Recovering low-rank matrices from few coefficients in any basis. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.1879 (2009).
27. Shabani, A., Kosut, R. L. & Rabitz, H. Compressed quantum process tomography. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.5498 (2009).
28. Shabani, A., Mohseni, M., Lloyd, S., Kosut, R. L. & Rabitz, H. Efficient estimation of nearly sparse many-body quantum Hamiltonians. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.1330 (2010).
29. Schollwöck, U. The density-matrix renormalization group. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 259-315 (2005).
30. Schuch, N. & Cirac, J. I. Matrix product state and mean field solutions for onedimensional systems can be found efficiently. Phys. Rev. A 82, 012314(2010).
31. Aharonov, D., Arad, I. & Irani, S. An efficient algorithm for approximating 1D ground states. Phys. Rev. A 82, 012315(2010).
32. Eisert, J., Cramer, M. & Plenio, M. B. Area laws for the entanglement entropy-a review,. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277-306 (2010).
33. Bratteli, O. & Robinson, D. W. Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics Texts and Monographs in Physics Vol. 2 (Springer, 1979).
34. Verstraete, F. & Cirac, J. I. Renormalization algorithms for quantum-many body systems in two and higher dimensions. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0407066 (2004).
35. de Beaudrap, N., Ohliger, M., Osborne, T. J. & Eisert, J. Solving frustration-free spin systems. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.3781 (2010.).
36. Tagliacozzo, L., Evenbly, G. & Vidal, G. Simulation of two-dimensional quantum systems using a tree tensor network that exploits the entropic area law. Phys. Rev. B 80, 235127(2009).
37. Evenbly, G. & Vidal, G. Algorithms for entanglement renormalization. Phys. Rev. B 79, 144108(2009).
38. Walgate, J., Short, A., Hardy, L. & Vedral, V Local distinguishability of multipartite orthogonal quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4972-4975 (2000).
39. Virmani, S., Sacchi, M. F., Plenio, M. B. & Markham, D. Optimal local discrimination of two multipartite pure states. Phys. Lett. A. 288, 62-68 (2001).