Simulation of Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) analysis using FEMM software

ISIEA 2010 - 2010 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 481-486

  Zakaria, Zulkarnay ^a   Mansor, Muhammad Saiful Badri ^a   Jahidin, Aishah Hartini ^a   Azlan, Mohd Shuhanaz Zanar ^a   Rahim, Ruzairi Abdul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA PERLIS   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Finite element method; Hall effect sensor; Magnetic field; Magnetic flux leakage; Pipeline tank

Indexed keywords

GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATIONS; HALL EFFECT SENSOR; MAGNETIC FIELD DISTRIBUTION; MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE; MAGNETIC METHODS; NON DESTRUCTIVE TESTING; PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION; PIPELINE/TANK; SMALL DISPLACEMENT;

ASTATINE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CRACKS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GYRATORS; HALL EFFECT; INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS; LEAKAGE (FLUID); MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; MAGNETIC STRUCTURE; MAGNETISM; NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION; PETROLEUM TRANSPORTATION; PIPELINES; SENSORS; STEEL TESTING; SWITCHING CIRCUITS;

MAGNETIC LEAKAGE;

EID: 79251568973     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ISIEA.2010.5679417     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. A.A. Carvalho, J.M.A. Rebello, L.V.S. Sagrilo, C.S. Camerini, I.V.J. Miranda, (2006). MFL Signals and Artificial Neural Networks Applied To Detection and Classification of Pipe Weld Defects, Science Direct NDT&E International, 39: pp. 661-667.
2. Kershaw. R, Innovative Pigging Solutions for Pipelines in Tech Notes, Pipeline Gas Journal Article, Chesterfield, UK, issued release on 2002.
3. Porter TR, Parsons J, Martin M, (2001). Pipeline Integrity: Enhanced Decision Support with GIS, issue review on GIS for Oil & Gas Conference.
4. Nondestructive Testing Handbook, USA: American Society for Nondestructive Testing, 1986.
5. Atherton, D. L., and Jiles, D. C., (1983). Effects of Stress On The Magnetization of Steel, IEEE Transitions on Magnetics, 19: pp. 2-18.
6. L. Yong, Y.T Gui, Steve Ward, (2001). Numerical Simulation On Magnetic Flux Leakage Evaluation At High Speed, Elsevier NDT & E International, Elsevier Science Journal. 39: pp. 367-372.
7. Ida N, Lord W., (1983). 3-D Finite Element Predictions of Magnetostatic Leakage Fields, IEEE Trans Magn, 19: pp. 16-45.
8. Atherton DL. (1988). Finite Element Calculations And Computer Measurements of Magnetic Flux Leakage Patterns From Pits, Br J NDT, 30:pp. 62-159.
9. Ivanov PA, Zhang Z, Yeoh CH, Udpa L, Sun Y, Udpa SS,. (1998). Magnetic Flux Leakage Modeling For Mechanical Damage In Transmission Pipelines. IEEE Trans Magn, 34: pp. 20-30.
10. Mao W, Mandache C, Clapham L, Atherton DL., (2001). The Effect of Bulk Stresses On Magnetic Flux Leakage Signals. Insight, 13: pp. 91-114.
11. Babbar V, Shiari B, Clapham L., (2004). Mechanical Damage Detection With Magnetic Flux Leakage Tools: Modeling The Effect Of Localized Residual Stresses. IEEE Trans Magn, 40: pp. 9-43.
12. S. Tupsie, A. Isaramongkolrak, P. Pao-la-or., (2009). Analysis of Electromagnetic Field Effects Using FEM for Transmission Lines Transposition, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 53: pp. 870-874.
13. Monk P., (2003). Finite Element Methods For Maxwell's Equations, Oxford University Press, pp. 36-49.
14. Jin J. (2002). The Finite Element Method In Electromagnetics, J. Wiley & Sons, pp. 734-753.
15. Tarvydas P., Markevičius V., (2000). Computation of Magnetic Fields Using a Finite Element Method, Elektronika ir elektrotechnika, Kaunas Technologija, 24: pp. 33-37.
16. Thomas W. Krause, R. M. Donaldson, R. Barnes, David L. Atherton., (1996). Variation of The Stress Dependent Magnetic Flux Leakage Signal with Defect Depth and Flux Density, NDT & E International, Elsevier, 29: pp. 79-86.
17. Tarvydas P., Pačėsaitė E., Noreika A., (2004). Coil Magnetic Field Modeling In 3-D Space, Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Kaunas Technologija, 55: pp. 17-20.