Nested maximin Latin hypercube designs

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 371-395

  Rennen, Gijs ^a   Husslage, Bart ^a   Van Dam, Edwin R ^a   Dick, Den Hertog ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Design of computer experiments; Latin hypercube design; Linking parameter; Multi fidelity modeling; Nested designs; Sequential simulation; Space filling; Training and test set; Validation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER EXPERIMENT; LATIN HYPERCUBE DESIGN; LINKING PARAMETER; MULTI-FIDELITY MODELING; NESTED DESIGN; SEQUENTIAL SIMULATION; SPACE-FILLING; TRAINING AND TEST SET; VALIDATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EXPERIMENTS; GEOMETRY;

DESIGN;

EID: 79251558272     PISSN: 1615147X     EISSN: 16151488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-009-0432-y     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Barthelemy JFM, Haftka RT (1993) Approximation concepts for optimum structural design-a review. Struct Multidisc Optim 5(3):129-144
2. Booker AJ, Dennis JE, Frank PD, Serafini DB, Torczon V, Trosset MW (1999) A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates. StructMultidisc Optim 17(1):1-13
3. Cherkassky V, Mulier F (1998) Learning from data: concepts, theory, and methods. Wiley, New York
4. Cressie NAC (1993) Statistics for spatial data (revised ed), vol 605. Wiley, New York
5. Den Hertog D, Stehouwer HP (2002) Optimizing color picture tubes by high-cost nonlinear programming. Eur J Oper Res 140(2):197-211 (Pubitemid 34435027)
6. Forrester AIJ, Keane AJ, Bressloff NW (2006) Design and analysis of "noisy" computer experiments. AIAA J 44(10):2331-2339 (Pubitemid 44672249)
7. Forrester AIJ, Sóbester A, Keane AJ (2007) Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling. In: Proceedings of the royal society a: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, vol 463. The Royal Society, London, pp 3251-3269
8. Forrester AIJ, Sóbester A, Keane AJ (2008) Engineering design via surrogate modelling: a practical guide. Wiley, Chichester Goel T, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Watson LT (2008) Pitfalls of using a single criterion for selecting experimental designs. Int J Numer Methods Eng 75(2):127-155
9. Grosso A, Jamali ARMJU, Locatelli M (2009) Finding maximin Latin hypercube designs by iterated local search heuristics. Eur J Oper Res 197(2):541-547
10. Husslage BGM, Van Dam ER, Den Hertog D, Stehouwer HP, Stinstra ED (2003) Collaborative metamodeling: coordinating simulation-based product design. Concurr Eng Res Appl 11(4):267-278
11. Husslage BGM, Van Dam ER, Den Hertog D (2005) Nested maximin Latin hypercube designs in two dimensions. CentER Discussion Paper 2005-79. Tilburg University, Tilburg, pp 1-11
12. Husslage BGM, Rennen G, Van Dam ER, Den Hertog D (2008) Space-filling Latin hypercube designs for computer experiments. CentER Discussion Paper 2008-104. Tilburg University, Tilburg, pp 1-14
13. Jin R, Chen W, Sudjianto A (2002) On sequential sampling for global metamodeling in engineering design. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2002 design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. Montreal, pp 1-10
14. Jin R, Chen W, Sudjianto A (2005) An efficient algorithm for constructing optimal design of computer experiments. J Stat Plan Inference 134(1):268-287 (Pubitemid 40771562)
15. Johnson ME, Moore LM, Ylvisaker D (1990) Minimax and maximin distance designs. J Stat Plan Inference 26:131-148
16. Jones DR (2001) A taxonomy of global optimization methods based on response surfaces. J Glob Optim 21(4):345-383 (Pubitemid 33672374)
17. Kennedy MC, O'Hagan A (2000) Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available. Biometrika 87(1):1-13
18. Kleijnen JPC (2008) Design and analysis of simulation experiments. In: International series in operations research&management science, vol 111. Springer, New York
19. Montgomery DC (1984) Design and analysis of experiments,2nd ed. Wiley, New York
20. MorrisMD, Mitchell TJ (1995) Exploratory designs for computer experiments. J Stat Plan Inference 43:381-402
21. Myers RH(1999) Response surface methodology-current status and future directions. J Qual Technol 31:30-74
22. Qian Z, Seepersad CC, Joseph VR, Allen JK, Wu CFJ (2006) Building surrogate models based on detailed and approximate simulations. J Mech Des 128(4):668-677 (Pubitemid 44123152)
23. Queipo NV, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Goel T, Vaidyanathan R, Tucker PK (2005) Surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 41(1):1-28 (Pubitemid 40537187)
24. Sacks J, Schiller SB, Welch WJ (1989a) Designs for computer experiments. Technometrics 31:41-47
25. Sacks J, Welch WJ, Mitchell TJ, Wynn HP (1989b) Design and analysis of computer experiments. Stat Sci 4:409-435
26. Santner ThJ,Williams BJ, NotzWI (2003) The design and analysis of computer experiments. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York
27. Simpson TW, Booker AJ, Ghosh D, Giunta AA, Koch PN, Yang R-J (2004) Approximation methods in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization: a panel discussion. Struct Multidisc Optim 27(5):302-313
28. Simpson TW, Toropov VV, Balabanov V, Viana FAC (2008) Design and analysis of computer experiments in multidisciplinary design optimization: a review. In: Proceedings of the 12th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, pp 1-22
29. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Haftka RT (1997) Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments. Struct Multidisc Optim 14(1):1-23 (Pubitemid 127676975)
30. Van Dam ER, Husslage BGM, Den Hertog D, Melissen JBM (2007) Maximin Latin hypercube designs in two dimensions. Oper Res 55(1):158-169 (Pubitemid 46663480)
31. Van Dam ER, Husslage BGM, Den Hertog D (2009a) Onedimensional nested maximin designs. J Glob Optim (in press)
32. Van Dam ER, Rennen G, Husslage BGM (2009b) Bounds for maximin Latin hypercube designs. Oper Res 57:595-608
33. Viana FAC, Balabanov V, Venter G, Garcelon J, Steffen V (2007) Generating optimal Latin hypercube designs in real time. In: 7th world congress on structural and multidisciplinary optimization, pp 2310-2315
34. Wang GG, Shan S (2007) Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. J Mech Des 129(4):370-380 (Pubitemid 46736217)
35. Ye KQ, Li W, Sudjianto A (2000) Algorithmic construction of optimal symmetric Latin hypercube designs. J Stat Plan Inference 90(1):145-159