An analysis of premixed flamelet models for large eddy simulation of turbulent combustion

Physics of Fluids

Volumn 22, Issue 11, 2010, Pages

  Knudsen, E ^a   Kim, S H ^a   Pitsch, H ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMBUSTION; ERRORS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION;

FLAMELET METHODS; INDIVIDUAL MODELING; LEVEL SET FRAMEWORK; MODELING STRATEGY; PREMIXED TURBULENT FLAMES; PROVIDE GUIDANCES; THIN REACTION ZONES REGIME; TURBULENT COMBUSTION;

LARGE EDDY SIMULATION;

EID: 79251542094     PISSN: 10706631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.3490043     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Wall C. Boersma B.J. Moin P. Evaluation of the assumed beta probability density function subgrid-scale model for large eddy simulation of nonpremixed, turbulent combustion with heat release. Phys. Fluids 2000, 12:2522. PHFLE6, 1070-6631, 10.1063/1.1287911.
2. Peters N. Turbulent Combustion 2000, 10.1017/CBO9780511612701, (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England, ).
3. Pitsch H. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2006, 38:453. ARVFA3, 0066-4189, 10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092133.
4. Gicquel O. Darabiha N. Thévenin D. Laminar premixed hydrogen/air counterflow flame simulations using flame prolongation of ILDM with differential diffusion. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2000, 28:1901. PCIRC2, 1540-7489, 10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80594-9.
5. Fiorina B. Gicquel O. Vervisch L. Carpentier S. Darabiha N. Approximating the chemical structure of partially premixed and diffusion counterflow flames using FPI flamelet tabulation. Combust. Flame 2005, 140:147. CBFMAO, 0010-2180, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.11.002.
6. van Oijen J.A. Lammers F.A. de Goey L.P. H. Modeling of complex premixed burner systems by using flamelet-generated manifolds. Combust. Flame 2001, 127:2124. CBFMAO, 0010-2180, 10.1016/S0010-2180(01)00316-9.
7. Vreman A.W. Albrecht B.A. van Oijen J.A. de Goey L.P. H. Bastiaans R.J. M. Premixed and nonpremixed generated manifolds in large-eddy simulation of Sandia flame D and F. Combust. Flame 2008, 153:394. CBFMAO, 0010-2180, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.01.009.
8. Pierce C.D. Moin P. Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion. J. Fluid Mech. 2004, 504:73. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112004008213.
9. Ihme M. Cha C.M. Pitsch H. Prediction of local extinction and re-ignition effects in non-premixed turbulent combustion using a flamelet/progress variable approach. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2005, 30:793. PCIRC2, 1540-7489, 10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.260.
10. Pitsch H. Duchamp De Lageneste L. Large-eddy simulation of premixed turbulent combustion using a level set approach. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2002, 29:2001. PCIRC2, 1540-7489, 10.1016/S1540-7489(02)80244-9.
11. Knudsen E. Pitsch H. A dynamic model for the turbulent burning velocity for large eddy simulation of premixed combustion. Combust. Flame 2008, 154:740. CBFMAO, 0010-2180, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.05.024.
12. Ihme M. Pitsch H. Prediction of extinction and reignition in nonpremixed turbulent flames using a flamelet/progress variable model. 1. A priori study and presumed PDF closure. Combust. Flame 2008, 155:70. CBFMAO, 0010-2180, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.04.001.
13. Colin O. Ducros F. Veynante D. Poinsot T. A thickened flame model for large eddy simulations of turbulent premixed combustion. Phys. Fluids 2000, 12:1843. PHFLE6, 1070-6631, 10.1063/1.870436.
14. Legier J.P. Poinsot T. Veynante D. Dynamically thickened flame LES model for premixed and nonpremixed turbulent combustion. 2000, 157-168. and Proceedings of the CTR Summer Program, Stanford University
15. Kerstein A.R. Ashurst W.T. Williams F.A. Field equation for interface propagation in an unsteady homogeneous flow field. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 37:2728. PLRAAN, 1050-2947, 10.1103/PhysRevA.37.2728.
16. Pitsch H. A consistent level set formulation for large-eddy simulation of premixed turbulent combustion. Combust. Flame 2005, 143:587. CBFMAO, 0010-2180, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.08.031.
17. Williams F.A. The Mathematics of Combustion 1985, 97. J. D. Buckmaster, in edited by (SIAM)
18. Moureau V. Fiorina B. Pitsch H. A level set formulation for premixed combustion LES considering the turbulent flame structure. Combust. Flame 2009, 156:801. CBFMAO, 0010-2180, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.01.019.
19. Peters N. The turbulent burning velocity for large-scale and small-scale turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 1999, 384:107. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112098004212.
20. Veynante D. Vervisch L. Turbulent combustion modeling. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2002, 28:193. PECSDO, 0360-1285, 10.1016/S0360-1285(01)00017-X.
21. Ihme M. Pitsch H. Prediction of extinction and reignition in nonpremixed turbulent flames using a flamelet/progress variable model. 2. Application in LES of Sandia flames D and E. Combust. Flame 2008, 155:90. CBFMAO, 0010-2180, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.04.015.
22. Ihme M. Pollutant formation and noise emission in turbulent non-premixed flames. 2007, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.
23. Kaul C.M. Raman V. Balarac G. Pitsch H. Numerical errors in the computation of sub-filter scalar variance in large eddy simulations. Phys. Fluids 2009, 21:055102. PHFLE6, 1070-6631, 10.1063/1.3123531.
24. Veynante D. Knikker R. Comparison between LES results and experimental data in reacting flows. J. Turbul. 2006, 7:1. ZZZZZZ, 1468-5248, 10.1080/14685240600664044.
25. Lodato G. Domingo P. Vervisch L. Veynante D. Scalar variances: LES against measurements and mesh optimization criterion; scalar gradient: A three-dimensional estimation from planar measurements using DNS. 2008, 387-398. and Proceedings of the CTR Summer Program, Stanford University
26. Balarac G. Pitsch H. Raman V. Development of a dynamic model for the subfilter scalar variance using the concept of optimal estimators. Phys. Fluids 2008, 20:1. PHFLE6, 1070-6631.
27. Bedford K.W. Yeo W.K. Large Eddy Simulation of Complex Engineering and Geophysical Flows 1993, and (Cambridge University Press, New York, ).
28. Pierce C.D. Moin P. A dynamic model for subgrid-scale variance and dissipation rate of a conserved scalar. Phys. Fluids 1998, 10:3041. PHFLE6, 1070-6631, 10.1063/1.869832.
29. Lilly D.K. A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method. Phys. Fluids A 1992, 4:633. PFADEB, 0899-8213, 10.1063/1.858280.
30. Kim S.H. Pitsch H. Scalar gradient and small-scale structure in turbulent premixed combustion. Phys. Fluids 2007, 19:115104. PHFLE6, 1070-6631, 10.1063/1.2784943.
31. Kennedy C.A. Carpenter M.H. Lewis R.M. Low-storage, explicit Runge-Kutta schemes for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. Appl. Numer. Math. 2000, 35:177. ANMAEL, 0168-9274, 10.1016/S0168-9274(99)00141-5.
32. Lele S.K. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 1992, 103:16. JCTPAH, 0021-9991, 10.1016/0021-9991(92)90324-R.
33. Poinsot T.J. Lele S.K. Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows. J. Comput. Phys. 1992, 101:104. JCTPAH, 0021-9991, 10.1016/0021-9991(92)90046-2.
34. Pope S.B. Turbulent Flows 2000, (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England, ).