Effect of polyethylene glycol-based preservation solutions on graft injury in experimental kidney transplantation

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 378-379

  Bradley, J A ^a  

^a ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; PRESERVATION SOLUTION;

ANIMAL; DRUG EFFECT; GRAFT SURVIVAL; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; REPERFUSION INJURY; SWINE;

ANIMALS; GRAFT SURVIVAL; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; ORGAN PRESERVATION SOLUTIONS; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; REPERFUSION INJURY; SWINE;

EID: 79251502954     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7389     Document Type: Note

References (3)

1. Ploeg RJ, van Bockel JH, Langendijk PT, Groenewegen M, van der Woude FJ, Persijn GG, et al., Effect of preservation solution on results of cadaveric kidney transplantation. The European Multicentre Study Group. Lancet 1992; 340: 129-137.
2. Collins GM, Wicomb WN, Levin BS, Verma S, Avery J, Hill JD,. Heart preservation solution containing polyethyleneglycol: an immunosuppressive effect? Lancet 1991; 338: 890-891.
3. Perrin H, Thaunat O, Malcus C, Badet L, Hennino A, Codas R, et al., Immunoprotection by polyethylene glycol in organ preservation solutions is not due to an immunomasking effect. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24: 1682-1685.