Geographic variation in diapause induction: The grape berry moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

Environmental Entomology

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1751-1755

  Timer, Jody ^a   Tobin, Patrick C ^b   Saunders, Michael C ^c  

^a BEHREND COLLEGE   (United States)

^b NORTHERN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinal latitudinal variation; diapause; Paralobesia viteana; viticulture; Vitis

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; DIAPAUSE; ENVIRONMENTAL CUE; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; GROWING SEASON; LATITUDINAL GRADIENT; MOTH; PEST CONTROL; PEST SPECIES; PHOTOPERIOD; SYNCHRONY; VITICULTURE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GEOGRAPHY; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; MOTH; PARASITOLOGY; PHOTOPERIODICITY; PHYSIOLOGY; UNITED STATES; VITIS;

ANIMALS; GEOGRAPHY; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; MOTHS; PHOTOPERIOD; UNITED STATES; VITIS;

CANADA; UNITED STATES;

HEXAPODA; LEPIDOPTERA; TORTRICIDAE; VITACEAE; VITIS;

EID: 79251501689     PISSN: 0046225X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/EN10116     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Botero-Garces, N., and R. Isaacs. 2004. Inßuence of uncultivated habitats and natural host plants on cluster infestation by grape berry moth, Endopiza viteana Clemens (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Michigan vineyards. Environ. Entomol. 33: 310-319.
2. Bradford, M. J., and D. A. Roff. 1993. Bet hedging and the diapause strategies of the cricket Allonemobius fasciatus. Ecology 74: 1129-1135.
3. De Wilde, J. 1962. Photoperiodism in insects and mites. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 7: 1-26.
4. Denlinger, D. L. 2002. Regulation of diapause. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 93-122.
5. Galet, P. 1979. A practical ampelography. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
6. Hunter, M. D., and J. N. McNeil. 1997. Host-plant quality inßuences diapause and voltinism in a polyphagous insect herbivore. Ecology 78: 977-986.
7. Lees, A. D. 1955. The physiology of diapause in arthropods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
8. Morano, L. D., and M. A. Walker. 1995. Soils and plant communities associated with three Vitis species. Am. Midl. Nat. 134: 254-263.
9. Nagarkatti, S., P. C. Tobin, and M. C. Saunders. 2001. Diapause induction in the grape berry moth, Endopiza viteana (Clemens) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Environ. Entomol. 30: 540-544.
10. SAS Institute. 1999. SAS/STAT userÕs guide, version 8, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
11. Seaman, A. J., J. P. Nyrop, and T. J. Dennehy. 1990. Egg and larval parasitism of the grape berry moth (Lepidoptera: Toricidae) in three grape habitats in New York. Environ. Entomol. 19: 764-770.
12. Suwa, A., and T. Gotoh. 2006. Geographic variation in diapauses induction and mode of diapause inheritance in Tetranychus pueraricola. J. Appl. Entomol. 130: 329-335.
13. Tauber, M. J., and C. A. Tauber. 1972. Geographic variation in critical photoperiod and in diapause intensity of Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera). J. Insect Physiol. 1: 25-29.
14. Tauber, M. J., and C. A. Tauber. 1976. Insect seasonality: diapause maintenance, termination, and post-diapause development. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 21: 81-107.
15. Tauber, M. J., C. A. Tauber, and S. Masaki. 1986. Seasonal adaptations of insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
16. Tauber, M. J., C. A. Tauber, J. P. Nyrop, and M. G. Villani. 1998. Moisture, a vital but neglected factor in the seasonal ecology of insects: hypotheses and tests of mechanisms. Environ. Entomol. 27: 523-530.
17. Tobin, P. C., S. Nagarkatti, and M. C. Saunders. 2001. Modeling development in grape berry moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Environ. Entomol. 30: 692-699.
18. Tobin, P. C., S. Nagarkatti, and M. C. Saunders. 2002. Diapause maintenance and termination in grape berry moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Environ. Entomol. 31: 708-713.
19. Tobin, P. C., S. Nagarkatti, and M. C. Saunders. 2003. Phenology of grape berry moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in cultivated grape at selected geographic locations. Environ. Entomol. 32: 340-346.
20. U.S. Department of Agriculture Plants Database. 2010. ().