Pregnancy outcomes and prognostic factors from tubal sterilization reversal by sutureless laparoscopical re-anastomosis: A retrospective cohort study

Human Reproduction

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 354-359

  Schepens, Janneke J B F G ^a   Mol, Ben W J ^b   Wiegerinck, Maarten A H M ^a   Houterman, Saskia ^a   Koks, Carolien A M ^a  

^a MÁXIMA MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

laparoscopy; re anastomosis; refertilization; sterilization reversal; tubal

Indexed keywords

TISSUE ADHESIVE;

ADULT; AGE; ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICROSURGERY; NETHERLANDS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; PROBABILITY; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEROSA; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; STERILIZATION REVERSAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURELESS LAPAROSCOPIC REANASTOMOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE TUBE STERILIZATION;

EID: 79251496968     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq326     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Boeckxstaens A, Devroey P, Collins J, Tournaye H. Getting pregnant after tubal sterilization: surgical reversal or IVF? Hum Reprod 2007; 22:2660-2664.
2. Chi IC, Jones DB. Incidence, risk factors, and prevention of poststerilization regret in women: an updated international review from an epidemiological perspective. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1994; 49:722-732.
3. Dubuisson JB, Chapron C, Nos C, Moric P, Aubriot FX, Garnier P. Sterilization reversal: fertility results. Hum Reprod 1996;10:1145-1151.
4. Hanafi MM. Factors affecting the pregnancy rate after microsurgical reversal of tubal ligation. Fertil Steril 2003;80:434-440.
5. Kim JD, Kim KS, Doo JK, Rhyeu CH. A report on 387 cases of microsurgical tubal reversals. Fertil Steril 1997;68:875-880.
6. Koh CH. Microsurgical laparoscopic tubal resection and anastomosis: techniques and results. References en gynecologie obstetrique 1995 (Review), Congres Vichy,IFS, 102-104.
7. Liskin L, Rinehart W, Blackburn R, Rutledg AH. Minilaparotomy and laparoscopy: safe, effective, and widely used. Popul Rep C 1985; 9:C125-C167.
8. Petrucco OM, Silber SJ, Chamberlain SL, Warnes GM, Davies M. Live birth following day surgery reversal of female sterilisation in women older than 40 years: a realistic option in Australia? Med J Aust 2007; 187:271-273.
9. Rouzi AA, Mackinnon M, MeComb PF. Predictors of success of reversal of sterilization. Fertil Steril 1995;64:29-36.
10. Silber SJ, Cohen RS. Microsurgical reversal of tubal sterilization: factors affecting pregnancy rate, with long-term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol 1984;64:672-682.
11. United Nations. World contraceptive use. http://www.un.org/esa/ population/publications/contraceptive2009/WallChart-WCU2009- Data.xls.
12. Van Voorhis BJ. Comparison of tubal ligation reversal procedures. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2000;43:641.
13. Vemer HM. Refertilisatie bij de vrouw. Net Tijdschr Geneesk 1987; 13:16-18.
14. Wiegerinck MAHM, Roukema M, Kessel van PH, Mol BWJ. Sutureless re-anastomosis by laparoscopy versus microsurgical re-anastomosis by laparotomy for sterilization reversal: a matched cohort study. Hum Reprod 2005;20:2355-2358.
15. Yoon TK, Sung HR, Kang HG, Cha SH, Lee C, Cha K. Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: fertility outcome in 202 cases. Fertil Steril 1999; 72:1121-1126.
16. Yossry M, Aboulghar M, D'Angelo A, Gillett W. In vitro fertilisation versus tubal reanastomosis (sterilisation reversal) for subfertility after tubal sterilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;19:3.