Obstetric outcome after in vitro fertilization with single or double embryo transfer

Human Reproduction

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 442-450

  Sazonova, Antonina ^a   Källen, Karin ^b   Thurin Kjellberg, Ann ^a   Wennerholm, Ulla Britt ^a   Bergh, Christina ^a  

^a SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LUND   (Sweden)

Author keywords

children outcome; in vitro fertilization; maternal outcome; obstetric outcome; single embryo transfer

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEWBORN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PLACENTA DISORDER; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURITY; SWEDEN; VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT;

EID: 79251481466     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq325     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bergh T, Ericsson A, Hillensjö T, Nygren KG, Wennerholm UB. Deliveries and children born after in-vitro fertilization in Sweden 1982-1995. A cohort study. Lancet 1999;354:1579-1585.
2. Cnattingius S, Ericson A, Gunnarskog J, Källen B. A quality study of a medical birth registry. Scand Soc Med 1990;18:143-148.
3. De Neubourg D, Gerris J, Mangelschots K, Van Royen E, Vercruyssen M, Steylemans A, Elseviers M. The obstetrical and neonatal outcome of babies born after singleembryo transfer in IVF/ICSI compares favourably to spontaneously conceived babies. Hum Reprod 2006; 21:1041-1046.
4. De Sutter P, Delbaere I, Gerris J, Verstraelen H, Goetgeluk S, Van der Elst J, Temmerman M, Dhont M. Birthweight of singletons after assisted reproduction is higher after single-than after doubleembryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2006;21:2633-2637.
5. Ebner T, Yaman C, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Pölz W, Tews G. Embryo fragmentation in vitro and its impact on treatment and pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril 2001;76:282-285.
6. Healy DL, Breheny S, Halliday J, Jaques A, Rushford D, Garrett C, Talbot JM, Baker HWG. Prevalence and risk factors for obstetric haemorrhage in 6730 singleton births after assisted reproductive technology in Victoria Australia. Hum Reprod 2010;25:265-274.
7. Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DA, Donker D, Keirse MJ. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 2004;328:261-265.
8. Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, Croughan MS. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:551-563.
9. Källen B, Finnström O, Nygren KG, Olausson P. In vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden: infant outcome after different IVF methods. Fertil Steril 2005a; 84:611-617. (Pubitemid 41317718)
10. Källen B, Finnström O, Nygren KG, Olausson P. In vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden: risk for congenital malformations after different IVF methods. Birth defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2005b;73:162-169. (Pubitemid 40478241)
11. Källen B, Finnström O, Nygren KG, Olausson P. In vitro fertilization in Sweden: child morbidity including cancer risk. Fertil Steril 2005c; 84:605-610.
12. Källen B, Finnström O, Nygren KG, Olausson P. Temporal trends in multiple births after IVF in Sweden, 1982-2001: a register study. BMJ 2005d;331:382-383.
13. Källen B, Finnström O, Nygren KG, Olausson PO, Wennerholm UB. In vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden: obstetric characteristics, maternal morbidity & mortality. BJOG 2005e;12:1529-1535.
14. Källén B, Finnström O, Lindam A, Nilsson E, Nygren KG, Otterblad Olausson P. Trends in delivery and neonatal outcome after in vitro fertilization in Sweden: data for 25 years. Hum Reprod 2010; 25:1026-1034.
15. Marsál K, Persson PH, Larsen T, Lilja H, Selbing A, Sultan B. Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights. Acta Paediatr 1996;85:843-848.
16. Miettinen OS. Simple interval estimation of risk ratio. Am J Epidemiol 1974; 100:515-516.
17. National Board of Health and Welfare, Centre for Epidemiology. The Swedish Medical Birth Registry-a Summary of Content and Quality. Available at: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer//2003/2003-112-3, 2003.
18. Pandian Z, Bhattacharya S, Ozturk O, Serour G, Templeton A. Number of embryos for transfer following in-vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;15:CD003416.
19. Pinborg A, Liedegaard O, la Cour Freiesleben N, Andersen AN. Consequences of vanishing twins in IVF/ICSI pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2005;20:2821-2829.
20. Pinborg A, Lidegaard O, la Cour Freisenleben N, Nyboe Andersen A. Vanishing twin: a predictor of small-for-gestational age in IVF singletons. Hum Reprod 2007;22:2707-2714.
21. Poikkeus P, Gissler M, Unkila-Kallio L, Hyden-Granskog C, Tiitinen A Obstetric and neonatal outcome after single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1073-1079.
22. Romundstad LB, Romundstad PR, Sunde A, von Düring V, Skjaerven R, Gunnell D, Vatten LJ. Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilisation: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2008;372:737-743.
23. Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Wilcox LS. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med 2002;346:731-737. (Pubitemid 34983993)
24. Shevell T, Malcone FD, Vidaver J, Porter TF, Luthy DA, Comstock CH, Hankins GD, Eddleman K, Dolan S, dugoff L et al. Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:517-525.
25. Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjö T, Jablanowska B, Pinborg A, Strandell A, Bergh C. Elective singleembryo transfer versus doubleembryo transfer in in-vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2392-2402.
26. Thurin Kjellberg A, Carlsson P, Bergh C. Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis. Hum Reprod 2006;21:210-216. (Pubitemid 41794313)
27. Wang YA, Sullivan EA, Healy DL, Black DA. Perinatal outcomes after assisted reproductive technology treatment in Australia and New Zealand: single versus double embryo transfer. Med J Aust 2009;190:234-237.