Development of the personalized criteria for microscopic review following four different series of hematology analyzer in a Chinese large scale hospital

Chinese Medical Journal

Volumn 123, Issue 22, 2010, Pages 3231-3237

  Cui, Wei ^a   Wu, Wei ^a   Wang, Xin ^a   Wang, Geng ^a   Hao, Ying Ying ^a   Chen, Yu ^a   Luo, Dan ^b   Shou, Wei Ling ^a   Zhang, Shuo ^a   Xiang, Xue Fang ^a   Si, Yong Zhen ^a   Chen, Qian ^a   Cai, Hao ^a   Li, Tan ^c   Shen, Han ^c   Shang, Kun ^c   Zhang, Yong Qiang ^c  

^a PEKING UNION MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (China)

^b General Hospital of Air ForceofChinese People's Liberation Army   (China)

^c SYSMEX CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Automated hematology analyzer; Complete blood count; Criteria; Microscopy review

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOANALYZER; BLOOD ANALYSIS; BLOOD SAMPLING; BLOOD SMEAR; CELL STRUCTURE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; MALE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SCHOOL CHILD; THROMBOCYTE COUNT; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CHINA; FEMALE; HEMATOLOGIC TESTS; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79251478411     PISSN: 03666999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2010.22.011     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Jean A, Boutet C, Lenormand B, Callat MP, Buchonnet G, Barbay V, et al. The new haematology analyzer DxH 800: an evaluation of the analytical performances and leucocyte flags, comparison with the LH 755. Int J Lab Hematol 2010; Epub ahead of print.
2. La Porta AD, Bowden AS, Barr S. Workflow improvement and impact of the new Beckman Coulter LH 1500 high throughput automated hematology workcell. Lab Hematol 2004; 10: 95-101.
3. Field D, Taube E, Heumann S. Performance evaluation of the immature granulocyte parameter on the Sysmex XE-2100 automated hematology analyzer. Lab Hematol 2006; 12: 11-14.
4. Barnes PW, McFadden SL, Machin SJ, Simson E; international consensus group for hematology. The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis. Lab Hematol 2005; 11: 83-90.
5. Cong YL, Wang CF, Yue JX. Principles and procedure of determining criteria for smear review following automated complete blood count and leukocyte differential count. Chin J Lab Med (Chin) 2008; 31: 729-732.
6. Zandecki M, Genevieve F, Gerard J, Godon A. Spurious counts and spurious results on haematology analysers: a review. Part I: platelets. Int J Lab Hematol 2007; 29: 4-20.
7. Cooperation Group of Formulation Review Criteria for Automated CBC and WBC Differential Analysis by Sysmex XE-2100 Hematology Analyzer. Review criteria for automated complete blood count and WBC differential analysis by Sysmex XE-2100 hematology analyzer. Chin J Lab Med (Chin) 2008; 31: 752-757.
8. Wang HF, Sun F, Yu GJ, Wang MS, Liu N, Jin YH, et al. Applications of international blood smear review criteria for improvement on Beckman-Coulter hematology analyzers. Chin J Lab Med (Chin) 2008; 31: 758-762.
9. Sun F, Wang HF, Yu JF, Mu Y, Liu J, Du ZB. Criteria for performing peripheral blood smear review and its clinical application. Chin J Lab Med (Chin) 2005; 28: 155-157.
10. Novis DA, Walsh M, Wilkinson D, St Louis M, Ben-Ezra J. Laboratory productivity and the rate of manual peripheral blood smear review: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 95 141 complete blood count determinations performed in 263 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006; 130: 596-601.
11. Ye YW, Wang YS, Shen ZY. National guide to clinical laboratory procedures. 3rd ed. Nanjing: Southeast University Press; 2006: 137.
12. Huh J, Moon H, Chung W. Erroneously elevated immature reticulocyte counts in leukemic patients determined using a Sysmex XE-2100 hematology analyzer. Ann Hematol 2007; 86: 759-762.
13. van der Meer W, Scott CS, de Keijzer MH. Automated flagging influences the inconsistency and bias of band cell and atypical lymphocyte morphological differentials. Clin Chem Lab Med 2004; 42: 371-377.
14. Aulesa C, Pastor I, Naranjo D, Galimany R. Application of receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis when definitive and suspect morphologic flags appear in the new Coulter LH 750 analyzer. Lab Hematol 2004; 10: 14-23.
15. Yamamura R, Yamane T, Hino M, Ohta K, Shibata H, Tsuda I, et al. Possible automatic cell classification of bone marrow aspirate using the CELL-DYN 4000 automatic blood cellanalyzer. J Clin Lab Anal 2002; 16: 86-90.
16. Thalhammer-Scherrer R, Knöbl P, Korninger L, Schwarzinger I. Automated five-part white blood cell differential counts. Efficiency of software-generated white blood cell suspect flags of the hematology analyzers Sysmex SE-9000, Sysmex NE-8000, and Coulter STKS. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1997; 121: 573-577.
17. Field D, Taube E, Heumann S. Performance evaluation of the immature granulocyte parameter on the Sysmex XE-2100 automated hematology analyzer. Lab Hematol 2006; 12: 11-14.
18. Lefrère F, Zohar S, Beaudier S, Audat F, Ribeil JA, Ghez D, et al. Evaluation of an algorithm based on peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cell and CD34+ cell concentrations to optimize peripheral blood progenitor cell collection by apheresis.Transfusion 2007; 47: 1851-1857.
19. Shelat SG, Canfield W, Shibutani S. Differences in detecting blasts between ADVIA 2120 and Beckman-Coulter LH750 hematology analyzers. Int J Lab Hematol 2010; 32: 113-116.
20. Bourner G, Dhaliwal J, Sumner J. Performance evaluation of the latest fully automated hematology analyzer in a large commercial laboratory setting: a 4-way, side-by-side study. Lab Hematol 2005; 11: 285-297.