Applicability of the SECI Model of knowledge creation in Russian cultural context: Theoretical analysis

Knowledge and Process Management

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 56-66

  Andreeva, Tatiana ^a   Ikhilchik, Irina ^a  

^a ST PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79251469438     PISSN: 10924604     EISSN: 10991441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/kpm.351     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Alexashin Y, Blenkinsopp J. 2005. Changes in Russian managerial values: a test of the convergence hypothesis? International Journal of Human Resource Management 16(3): 427-444.
2. Andreeva T. 2008. Can organizational change be planned and controlled? Evidence from Russian companies. Human Resource Development International 11(2): 119-134.
3. Andreeva T. 2009. Knowledge exchange as a success factor. An example of the OAO Mekhanobr-Tekhnika Research Corporation. Case study, ECCH registration no. 909-001-1.
4. Ang Z, Massingham P. 2007. National culture and the standardization versus adaptation of knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management 11(2): 5-21.
5. Ardichvili A, Cardozo RN, Gasparishvili A. 1998. Leadership styles and management practices of russian entrepreneurs: implications for transferability of Western HRD interventions. Human Resource Development Quarterly 9(2): 145-155.
6. Bhagat RS, Kedia BL, Harveston PD, Triandis HC. 2002. Cultural variations in the cross-border transfer of organizational knowledge: an integrative framework. Academy of Management Review 27(2): 204-221.
7. Boyacigiller NA, Adler NJ. 1991. The parochial dinosaur: organizational science in a global context. Academy of Management Review 16(2): 262-290.
8. Chuan L, Wen-Jung Ch. 2005. The effects of internal marketing and organizational culture on knowledge management in the information technology industry. International Journal of Management 22(4): 661-672.
9. Couto JP, Vieira JC. 2004. National culture and research and development activities. Multinational Business Review 12(1): 19-35.
10. DeLong DW, Fahey L. 2000. Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. Academy of Management Executive 14(4): 113-127.
11. Elenkov DS. 1998. Can American management concepts work in Russia? A cross-cultural comparative study. California Management Review 40(4): 133-156.
12. Fey CF, Denison D. 2003. Organizational culture and effectiveness: can American theory be applied in Russia? Organization Science 14(6): 686-706.
13. Fey CF, Nordahl C, Zatterstrom H. 1999. Organizational culture in Russia: the secret to success. Business Horizons 42(6): 47-55.
14. Glisby M, Holden N. 2003. Contextual constraints in knowledge management theory: the cultural embeddedness of Nonaka's knowledge-creating company. Knowledge & Process Management 10(1): 29-36.
15. Gourlay S. 2003. The SECI model of knowledge creation: some empirical shortcomings. Paper for the 4th European Conference on Knowledge Management, Oxford, England. accessed on October 16, 2009.
16. Gurkov I, Zelenova O. 2007. Human resource management in Russia. accessed on October 16, 2009.
17. Hall ET. 1959. The Silent Language. Doubleday: New York.
18. Hall ET. 1976. Beyond Culture. Anchor Press: Garden City, N.Y.
19. Hofstede G. 1980. Motivation, leadership and organization: do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics 9(1): 42-63.
20. Hofstede G. 1996. An American in paris: the influence of nationality on organization theories. Organization Studies 17(3): 525-537.
21. Hofstede G. 2001. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organisations Across Nations (2nd edition). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
22. Holden NJ. 2002. Cross-cultural management: a knowledge management perspective. Prentice Hall: Harlow, UK.
23. Holt DH, Ralston DA, Terpstra RH. 1994. Constraints on capitalism in Russia: the managerial psyche, social infrastructure, and ideology. California Management Review 36(3): 124-141.
24. House J, Hanges PJ, Javidan M, Dorfman P, Gupta V. 2004. Culture, Leadership, and Organizations. The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Sage Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks.
25. Javidan M, Stahl GK, Brodbeck F, Wilderom C. 2005. Cross-border transfer of knowledge: cultural lessons from Project GLOBE. Academy of Management Executive 19(2): 59-76.
26. Kayworth T, Leidner D. 2004. Organizational culture as a knowledge resource. In Handbook on Knowledge Management 1: Knowledge Matters. Holsapple CW, (ed.). Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg; 235-252.
27. Kets De Vries M. 2000. A journey into the "Wild East": leadership style and organizational practices in Russia. Organizational Dynamics 28(4): 67-82.
28. King WR. 2007. A research agenda for the relationships between culture and knowledge management. Knowledge & Process Management 14(3): 226-236.
29. Kohlbacher F, Krähe M. 2007. Knowledge creation and transfer in a cross-cultural context-empirical evidence from Tyco Flow Control. Knowledge & Process Management 14(3): 169-181.
30. May R, Young CB, Ledgerwood D. 1998. Lessons from Russian human resource management experience. European Management Journal 16(4): 447-459.
31. May RC, Puffer SM, McCarthy DJ. 2005. Transferring management knowledge to Russia: a culturally based approach. Academy of Management Executive 19(2): 24-35.
32. Michailova S, Husted K. 2003. Knowledge-sharing hostility in Russian firms. California Management Review 45(3): 59-77.
33. Michailova S, Hutchings K. 2006. National cultural influences on knowledge sharing: A comparison of China and Russia. Journal of Management Studies 43(3): 383-405.
34. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. 1995. The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press: New York, NY.
35. Osland JS, Bird A. 2000. Beyond sophisticated stereotyping: cultural sense-making in context. Academy of Management Executive 14(1): 65-80.
36. Polanyi M. 1997. Tacit knowledge. In Knowledge in Organizations, Prusak L (ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann: Boston; 135-146.
37. Ralston DA, Holt DH, Terpstra RH, Yu KC. 1997. The impact of national culture and economic ideology on managerial work values: a study of the United States, Russia, Japan and China. Journal of International Business Studies 28(1): 177-207.
38. Rice J, Rice B. 2002. The Applicability of the SECI Model to Multi-Organizational Endeavours: An Integrative Framework. International Journal of Organizational Behaviour 9(6): 671-682.
39. Romer PM, (interviewed by J. Kurtzman). 2004. The Knowledge Economy. In Handbook on Knowledge Management 1: Knowledge Matters, Chapter 1. Holsapple CW, (ed.). Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg; 73-87.
40. Schein E. 1992. Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
41. Schneider S, Barsoux JS. 2003. Managing Across Cultures. Prentice Hall: Harlow, UK.
42. Shane S. 1993. Cultural influences on national rates of innovation. Journal of Business Venturing 8(1): 59-74.
43. Shekshnia S. 1994. Managing people in Russia: challenges for foreign investors. European Management Journal 12(3): 298-305.
44. Shekshnia S. 2004. The Three Faces of Peter the Great - Leadership Lessons from the St. Petersburg's Founder. INSEAD working papers.
45. Takeuchi H. 2001. Towards a universal concept of knowledge management. In Managing Industrial Knowledge, Nonaka I, Teece D (eds). Sage: London; 315-329.
46. Veiga JF, Yanouzas JN, Buchholtz AK. 1995. Emerging cultural values in Russia: what will tomorrow bring? Business Horizons July-August: 20-27.
47. Von Krogh G, Ichijo K, Nonaka I. 2000. Enabling Knowledge Creation. Oxford University Press: New York.
48. Weir D, Hutchings K. 2005. Cultural embeddedness and contextual constraints: knowledge sharing in Chinese and Arab cultures. Knowledge & Process Management 12(2): 89-98.
49. Woldu HG, Budhwar PS, Parkes C. 2006. A cross-national comparison of cultural value orientations of Indian, Polish, Russian and American employees. International Journal of Human Resource Management 17(6): 1076-1094.
50. Zhu Z. 2004. Knowledge management: towards a universal concept or cross-cultural contexts? Knowledge Management Research & Practice 2(2): 67-79.