Peanut priming induced by biocontrol agents

Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 100-105

  Tonelli, María Laura ^a   Furlan, Ana ^a   Taurian, Tania ^a   Castro, Stella ^a   Fabra, Adriana ^a  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE QUÍMICA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

1,3 Glucanase; Arachis hypogaea L.; Bacillus sp.; ISR; Peanut; Peroxidase; PGPR; Priming; Pseudomonas sp.; Sclerotium rolfsii

Indexed keywords

ARACHIS HYPOGAEA; ATHELIA ROLFSII; BACILLUS SP.; PSEUDOMONAS; PSEUDOMONAS SP.; RHIZOBIALES;

EID: 79151481770     PISSN: 08855765     EISSN: 10961178     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2010.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Melouk H., Backman P. Management of soilborne fungal pathogens. Peanut health management 1995, 75-85. APS Press, St. Paul, MN. H. Melouk, F. Shokes (Eds.).
2. Bakker P., Van Peer R., Schippers B. Suppression of soil-borne plant pathogens by fluorescent Pseudomonads: mechanisms and prospects. Biotic interactions and soil-borne disease 1991, 217-230. Elsevier Scientific Publishers, Amsterdam. A. Beemster (Ed.).
3. Van Loon L., Rep M., Pieterse C. Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2006, 44:135-162.
4. Kloepper J., Rodriguez-Kabana R., Zehnder G., Murphy J., Sikora E., Fernandez C. Plant root-bacterial interactions in biological control of soilborne diseases and potential extension to systemic and foliar diseases. Aust Plant Pathol 1999, 28:27-33.
5. Pieterse C., Van Pelt J., Can Wees S., Ton J., León-Kloosterziel K., Keurenties J., et al. Rhizobacteria-mediated induced systemic resistance: triggering, signaling and expression. Eur J Plant Pathol 2001, 107:51-61.
6. Conrath U., Beckers G., Flors V., García-Agustín P., Jakab G., Mauch F., et al. Priming: getting ready for battle. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2006, 19:1062-1071.
7. Ramos Solano B., Barriuso Maicas J., Pereyra de la Iglesia M., Domenech J., Gutiérrez Mañero F. Systemic disease protection elicited by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria strains: relationship between metabolic responses, systemic disease protection, and biotic elicitors. Phytopathology 2008, 4:451-457.
8. Heil M., Bostock R. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) against pathogens in the context of induced plant defenses. Ann Bot 2002, 89:503-512.
9. Madhaiyan M., Suresh Reddy B., Anandham R., Senthilkumar M., Poonguzhali S., Sundaram S., et al. Plant growth promoting methylobacterium induces defense responses in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) compared with rot pathogens. Curr Microbiol 2006, 53:270-276.
10. Compant S., Duffy B., Nowak J., Clement C., Barka E.A. Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005, 71:4951-4959.
11. Pieterse C., Van Pelt J., Ton J., Parchmann S., Mueller M., Buchala A., et al. Rhizobacteria-mediated induced systemic resistance (ISR) in Arabidopsis thaliana requires sensitivity to jasmonate and ethylene but is not accompanied by an increase in their production. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 2000, 57:123-134.
12. Kishore G., Pande S., Rao J., Podile A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa inhibits the plant cell wall degrading enzymes of Sclerotium rolfsii and reduces severity of groundnut stem rot. Eur J Plant Pathol 2005, 113:316-320.
13. Zhang S., Reddy M., Kokalis-burelle N., Wells L., Nightengale S., Kloepper J. Lack of induced systemic resistance in peanut to late leaf spot disease by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and chemical elicitors. Plant Dis 2001, 85:879-884.
14. Tonelli M.L., Taurian T., Ibáñez F., Angelini J., Fabra A. Selection and in vitro characterization of biocontrol agents to protect peanut plants against fungal pathogens. J Plant Pathol 2010, 92:73-82.
15. Hoagland D., Arnon D. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif Agric Exp Sta Bull 1938, 347:36-39.
16. Fuchs J., Moënne-Loccoz Y., D'efago G. Nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum strain Fo47 induces resistance to Fusarium wilt in tomato. Plant Dis 1997, 81:492-496.
17. Arnon D.I. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 1949, 24:1-15.
18. Mc Kinney G. Some absorption spectra of leaf extract. Plant Physiol 1938, 13:128-140.
19. Bradford M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976, 72:248-254.
20. Frick F. Oxidative enzymes, In: Heitefuss R, Williams P, editors. Physiological plant pathology. Encyclop. of plant pathology, new series 4; 1976. p. 617-627.
21. Beaudoin-Eagan L.D., Thorpe T.A. Tyrosine and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activities during shoot initiation in tobacco callus cultures. Plant Physiol 1985, 78:438-441.
22. Dische Z. General color reactions. Method Carbohyd Chem 1962, 1:478-492.
23. De Laat A., Van Loon L. The relationship between stimulated ethylene production and symptom expression in virus-infected tobacco leaves. Physiol Plant Pathol 1983, 22:261-273.
24. Chen N., Goodwin P.H., Hsiang T. The role of ethylene during the infection of Nicotiana tabacum by Colletotrichum destructivum. J Exp Bot 2003, 4:2449-2456.
25. Dixon RA, Day PM, Lamb CJ. Advances in enzymology and related areas of molecular biology; 1983, vol. 55. p. 1-136.
26. Darvill A.G., Albersheim P. Phytoalexins and their elicitors-A defense against microbial infection in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physio 1984, 35:243-275.
27. Silva H., Romeiro R., Macagnan D., Halfeld-Vierira B., Pereira M., Mounteer A. Rhizobacterial induction of systemic resistance in tomato plants: non-specific protection and increase in enzyme activities. Biol Control 2004, 29:288-295.
28. Jakab G., Cottier V., Toquin V., Rigoli G., Zimmerti L., Metraux J., et al. ß-aminobutyric acid-induced resistance in plants. Eur J Plant Pathol 2001, 107:29-37.
29. Ishida A., Souza R., Resende M., Calvancanti F., Oliveira D., Pozza E. Rhizobacterium and acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM) in resistance induction against bacterial blight and expression of defense responses in cotton. Trop Plant Pathol 2008, 33:27-34.
30. Savaranakumar D., Vijayakumar C., Kumar N., Samiyappan R. PGPR-induced defense responses in the tea plant against blister blight disease. Crop Prot 2007, 26:556-565.
31. Yang S.F., Hoffman N.E. Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physio 1984, 35:155-189.
32. Toppan A., Esquerre-Tugaye M.T. Cell surfaces in plant-microorganism interactions: IV. Fungal glycopeptides which elicit the synthesis of ethylene in plants. Plant Physiol 1984, 75:1133-1138.
33. Roby D., Toppan A., Esquerre-Tugaye M.T. Cell surfaces in plant-microorganism interactions: V. Elicitors of fungal and of plant origin trigger the synthesis of ethylene and of cell wall hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein in plants. Plant Physiol 1985, 77:700-704.
34. Verhagen B., Glazebrook J., Zhu T., Chang H.S., Van Loon L., Pieterse C. The transcriptome of rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2004, 17:895-908.
35. Gilbert G., Handelsman J., Parke J. Root camouflage and disease control. Phytopathology 1994, 84:222-225.
36. Turner J., Backman P. Factors relating to peanut yield increases after seed treatment with Bacillus subtilis. Plant Dis 1991, 75:347-353.
37. Emmert E., Handelsman J. Biocontrol of plant disease: a (gram-) positive perspective. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1999, 171:1-9.