The home as an appropriate setting for women undertaking cervical ripening before the induction of labour

Midwifery

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 30-35

  Reid, Margaret ^a   Lorimer, Karen ^a   Norman, Jane E ^b   Bollapragada, Shrikant S ^a   Norrie, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cervical ripening; Home; Qualitative; Women's experiences

Indexed keywords

DELAVIRDINE; DRUG DERIVATIVE; ISOSORBIDE 5 NITRATE; ISOSORBIDE DINITRATE; ISOSORBIDE MONONITRATE; NITRIC OXIDE DONOR;

ADULT; AMBULATORY CARE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INTRAVAGINAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LABOR INDUCTION; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICS; UNITED KINGDOM; UTERINE CERVIX RIPENING;

ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVAGINAL; ADULT; AMBULATORY CARE; CERVICAL RIPENING; DELAVIRDINE; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; ISOSORBIDE DINITRATE; LABOR, INDUCED; NITRIC OXIDE DONORS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79151480841     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2009.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alehagan S., Wijma B., Wijma K. Fear of childbirth before, during and after childbirth. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2006, 85:56-62.
2. Blix-Lindström S., Christensson K., Johansson E. Women's satisfaction with decision-making related to augmentation of labour. Midwifery 2004, 20:104-112.
3. Bollapragada S., MacKenzie F., Norrie J., et al. Randomised placebo controlled trial of outpatient (at home) cervical ripening with isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) prior to induction of labour-clinical trial with analyses of efficacy, and acceptability; the IMOP Study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009, 116:1185-1195.
4. Bullarbo M., Orrskog M.E., Andersch B., Granstrom L., Norstrom A., Ekerhovd E. Outpatient vaginal administration of the nitric oxide donor isosorbide mononitrate for cervical ripening and labour induction postterm: a randomised controlled study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007, 196. 50.e-50.e5.
5. Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit Induction of Labour 2001, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London.
6. Creswell J.W. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design 1998, Sage, London.
7. Handbook of Qualitative Research 1994, Sage, London. N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.).
8. Green J.M., Baston H.A. Feeling in control during labour; correlates and consequences. Birth 2003, 30:235-247.
9. Healthcare Commission Women's Experiences of Maternity Care in the NHS in 2007 2008, Commission for Healthcare, Audit and Inspection, London.
10. Hodnett E. Personal control and the birth environment: comparisons between home and hospital settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1989, 9:207-216.
11. Johnson T.R., Callister L.C., Freeborn D.S., Beckstrand R.L., Huender K. Dutch women's perceptions of childbirth in the Netherlands. American Journal of Maternal and Child Nursing 2007, 32:170-177.
12. Kornelsen J. Essences and imperatives: an investigation of technology in childbirth. Social Science and Medicine 2005, 61:1495-1504.
13. Neale E., Pachulski A., Whiterod S., McGuiness E., Gallagher N., Wallace R. Outpatient cervical ripening prior to induction of labour. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2002, 22:634-635.
14. Nuutila M., Halmesmaki E., Hiilesmaa V., Ylikorkala O. Women's anticipations of and experiences with induction of labor. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1999, 78:704-709.
15. Nystedt A., Hogberg U., Lundman B. Some Swedish women's experiences of prolonged labour. Midwifery 2006, 22:56-65.
16. 2 gel with the nitric oxide donor isosorbide mononitrate for cervical ripening before the induction of labor at term. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006, 194:1012-1021.
17. Redshaw M., Rowe R., Hockley C., Brocklehurst P. 2007. Recorded delivery: a national survey of women's experience of maternity care 2006. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford.
18. Scottish Executive Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2006: General Report 2006, Scottish Executive National Statistics Publications, Edinburgh.
19. Shetty A., Burt R., Rice P., Templeton A. Women's perceptions, expectations and satisfaction with induced labour-a questionnaire-based study. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Reproductive Biology 2005, 123:56-61.
20. Shields N., Turnbull D., Reid M., Holmes A., McGinley M., Smith L.S. Satisfaction with midwife-care in different time periods: a randomised controlled trial of 1299 women. Midwifery 1998, 14:85-91.
21. Sjöblom I., Nordstrum B., Edberg A.-K. A qualitative study of women's experiences of home birth in Sweden. Midwifery 2006, 22:348-355.
22. Turnbull D., Holmes A., Shields N., et al. Randomised controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed care. The Lancet 1996, 348:213-218.
23. Viisainen K. Negotiating control and meaning; homebirth as a self-constructed choice in Finland. Social Science and Medicine 2001, 52:1109-1121.
24. Westfall R.E., Benoit C. The rhetoric of 'natural childbirth; childbearing women's perspectives on prolonged pregnancy and induction of labour. Social Science and Medicine 2004, 59:1397-1408.
25. Wong K.S., Ngai C., Wong A.Y.K., Tang L.C.H., Ho P.C. Vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal gemeprost in termination of second trimester pregnancy. Contraception 1998, 58:207-210.